宋代“平民社会”论刍议——研习钱穆论著的一个读书报告
发布时间：2019-07-09 17:30
【摘要】：称宋代为"第一个平民社会",据说出自钱穆。其实并不完全符合其原意。钱穆认为,平民社会始于秦汉,宋代只是更纯粹。他另有以士人为中心的四民社会一说,便与其平民社会论有所抵牾。尤须注意,钱穆所说的平民社会,其含义为无封建贵族、无特权阶级、无特殊势力的平等社会。然而钱穆对东汉至唐代的门阀士族、明清时代的绅士这两大特殊势力均有或深或浅的论述。何况在可视为"无定型时期"的西汉与宋代,同样不乏特殊势力。特殊势力在中国古代从来未曾缺位,平民社会即平等社会论之不妥是显而易见的,如若改称权力社会,或许较为近乎实情。
[Abstract]:The Song Dynasty was called the "first civilian society", which is said to have come from Qian Mu. In fact, it is not fully in line with its original intention. Qian Mu believes that the civilian society began in Qin and Han dynasties, and the Song Dynasty was just purer. As soon as he said that the scholar-centered society of the four people was in conflict with his theory of civil society. In particular, it should be noted that the civilian society mentioned by Qian Mu means an equal society without feudal aristocracy, no privileged class and no special power. However, Qian Mu discussed the two special forces from the Eastern Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty and the gentlemen in the Ming and Qing dynasties. Moreover, in the Western Han Dynasty and Song Dynasty, which can be regarded as "amorphous period", there is no lack of special forces. Special forces have never been absent in ancient China. It is obvious that the theory of equal society in civil society is inappropriate. If it is changed to power society, it may be closer to the truth.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：北京大学人文社会科学研究院所提供的支持
【分类号】：K244
本文编号：2512313
[Abstract]:The Song Dynasty was called the "first civilian society", which is said to have come from Qian Mu. In fact, it is not fully in line with its original intention. Qian Mu believes that the civilian society began in Qin and Han dynasties, and the Song Dynasty was just purer. As soon as he said that the scholar-centered society of the four people was in conflict with his theory of civil society. In particular, it should be noted that the civilian society mentioned by Qian Mu means an equal society without feudal aristocracy, no privileged class and no special power. However, Qian Mu discussed the two special forces from the Eastern Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty and the gentlemen in the Ming and Qing dynasties. Moreover, in the Western Han Dynasty and Song Dynasty, which can be regarded as "amorphous period", there is no lack of special forces. Special forces have never been absent in ancient China. It is obvious that the theory of equal society in civil society is inappropriate. If it is changed to power society, it may be closer to the truth.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：北京大学人文社会科学研究院所提供的支持
【分类号】：K244
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 张思齐;;钱穆黄帝观的宗教意识[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
2 陈勇;秦中亮;;钱穆与《先秦诸子系年》[J];史学史研究;2014年01期
3 舒云波;;学术与时代——基于梁启超论清学史两种的论述[J];四川教育学院学报;2008年04期
4 吴晓波;;我为什么愿意穿越回宋朝[J];发展;2012年07期
5 徐日辉;;钱穆所论黄帝政治中心的考古印证[J];浙江工商大学学报;2008年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 李自强 张强;钱穆 成都治学兼养生[N];成都日报;2006年
，本文编号：2512313
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2512313.html
