两《唐书》之《隐逸传》研究
发布时间：2019-07-09 19:32
【摘要】：《旧唐书》与《新唐书》均有《隐逸传》,且都是对唐朝隐逸情况的记载,但成书时间的不同使得两书传记在人物选取和史料内容方面均有一定的差异。本文以两《唐书·隐逸传》为研究对象,分别对其记载的相同人物与不同人物的传文加以考察,以求更清晰地概括唐代隐逸文化的特点以及宋祁修《新唐书》列传部分秉承的理念。文章共分为四部分:第一部分为绪论,主要阐述选题缘由并作相关文献综述;第二部分为第一章,首先分析隐逸的含义,其次梳理二十四史中设立《隐逸传》的情况,同时简要归纳唐代之前隐逸文化的特点,说明唐之前的隐士仍尊崇与朝廷不合作的态度,而唐代隐逸风尚在这方面则有很大的改变;第三部分为第二章,是对两书《隐逸传》记载人物的研究,这是本文的核心部分即对两《唐书·隐逸传》相同人物和不同人物的史料进行分析。对相同人物的考察主要在于分析两书修纂者就同一人物在行文时的书写差别,如籍贯、内容选择;分析不同人物的传文主要从两方面入手,对于《新唐书》新增的人物(即在《旧唐书》中无传者)重点考其传记史源,而原本在《旧唐书》中有传的人物则分析《新唐书》作者改动文字原因及其合理性;第四部分为第三章,是对全文的总结,即在上述两章分析的基础上,进一步概括唐代独特的隐逸特点以及宋祁修纂《新唐书》列传时的书写倾向及显著的忠君思想。
[Abstract]:Both the Old Tang Book and the New Tang Book have the Legend of seclusion, and they are both records of the seclusion of the Tang Dynasty, but the different time of writing makes the biographies of the two books have some differences in the selection of characters and the content of historical materials. In this paper, the reclusive biography of Tang Dynasty is taken as the research object, and the transmission of the same characters and different characters recorded in them is investigated respectively, in order to summarize more clearly the characteristics of seclusion culture in Tang Dynasty and the idea inherited in the biography of the New Tang Dynasty in Song Qixiu. The article is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly expounds the reasons for the topic and makes a review of the relevant literature; the second part is the first chapter, which first analyzes the meaning of seclusion, then combs the establishment of seclusion in the history of 24 years, and briefly summarizes the characteristics of seclusion culture before Tang Dynasty, which shows that the hermit before Tang Dynasty still respects the attitude of uncooperative with the court, while the seclusion fashion of Tang Dynasty has changed greatly in this respect. The third part is the second chapter, which is the study of the characters recorded in the two books, which is the core part of this paper, that is, the analysis of the historical data of the same characters and different characters in the two books of the Tang Dynasty. The investigation of the same characters mainly lies in the analysis of the differences between the two book compilers on the writing of the same characters, such as the place of origin and the selection of contents; the analysis of the transmission of different characters mainly from two aspects, focusing on the new characters in the New Tang Dynasty (that is, those who do not have the biography in the Old Tang Dynasty), while the characters who were originally handed down in the Old Tang Dynasty analyze the reasons for the changes of the characters in the New Tang Book and their rationality. The fourth part is the third chapter, which is the summary of the full text, that is, on the basis of the analysis of the above two chapters, it further summarizes the unique seclusion characteristics of Tang Dynasty and the writing tendency and remarkable loyal monarch thought when Song Qixiu compiles the Book of the New Tang Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K242
本文编号：2512389
[Abstract]:Both the Old Tang Book and the New Tang Book have the Legend of seclusion, and they are both records of the seclusion of the Tang Dynasty, but the different time of writing makes the biographies of the two books have some differences in the selection of characters and the content of historical materials. In this paper, the reclusive biography of Tang Dynasty is taken as the research object, and the transmission of the same characters and different characters recorded in them is investigated respectively, in order to summarize more clearly the characteristics of seclusion culture in Tang Dynasty and the idea inherited in the biography of the New Tang Dynasty in Song Qixiu. The article is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly expounds the reasons for the topic and makes a review of the relevant literature; the second part is the first chapter, which first analyzes the meaning of seclusion, then combs the establishment of seclusion in the history of 24 years, and briefly summarizes the characteristics of seclusion culture before Tang Dynasty, which shows that the hermit before Tang Dynasty still respects the attitude of uncooperative with the court, while the seclusion fashion of Tang Dynasty has changed greatly in this respect. The third part is the second chapter, which is the study of the characters recorded in the two books, which is the core part of this paper, that is, the analysis of the historical data of the same characters and different characters in the two books of the Tang Dynasty. The investigation of the same characters mainly lies in the analysis of the differences between the two book compilers on the writing of the same characters, such as the place of origin and the selection of contents; the analysis of the transmission of different characters mainly from two aspects, focusing on the new characters in the New Tang Dynasty (that is, those who do not have the biography in the Old Tang Dynasty), while the characters who were originally handed down in the Old Tang Dynasty analyze the reasons for the changes of the characters in the New Tang Book and their rationality. The fourth part is the third chapter, which is the summary of the full text, that is, on the basis of the analysis of the above two chapters, it further summarizes the unique seclusion characteristics of Tang Dynasty and the writing tendency and remarkable loyal monarch thought when Song Qixiu compiles the Book of the New Tang Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K242
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 郭学信;;宋代士大夫隐逸思潮探析[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2009年06期
2 高春燕;;论盛唐、中唐隐逸诗人的“真隐”和“心隐”[J];牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年05期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 崔兰海;唐代史料笔记研究[D];安徽大学;2013年
2 柳卓霞;《新唐书》列传叙事研究[D];上海大学;2010年
3 霍建波;隐逸诗研究（先秦至隋唐）[D];陕西师范大学;2005年
4 李红霞;唐代隐逸风尚与诗歌研究[D];陕西师范大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 孙颖涛;宋祁政治思想研究[D];华中师范大学;2014年
2 蔡婉娥;王绩《会心高士传》人物研究[D];福建师范大学;2014年
3 张杰;唐代隐士群体研究[D];西北大学;2013年
4 周璇;论王绩对陶渊明的接受[D];湖南大学;2013年
5 杜星霖;道教与隐士心态[D];山东大学;2013年
6 李静;论唐代道士吴筠[D];华中师范大学;2013年
7 张颖婷;初唐文人隐逸风尚与诗歌研究[D];新疆师范大学;2012年
8 高艳芳;唐末士人隐逸诗研究[D];广西师范大学;2012年
9 惠磊;孙思邈药王文化考[D];陕西中医学院;2012年
10 侯振兵;唐代处士与社会[D];陕西师范大学;2009年
，本文编号：2512389
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2512389.html
