结构主义及其分析方法的演进评析

发布时间：2018-03-10 07:34

本文选题：结构主义　切入点：宏观分析　出处：《经济社会体制比较》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：结构主义因超越了集体主义和个体主义的方法论视角而受到重视,但它因忽视了能动性而一度受到严厉的批评。在回应这种批评也即自身发展的过程中,它出现了一种发展趋势及两条发展路径:一种趋势是它超越结构主义的局限而力图展现出结构与能动的关联性;一条路径是从宏观分析到新历史制度主义,它以缩短研究时限,限定制度问题,压缩思考范围来增强解释力,并在相当程度上处理了结构与能动的关系;另一条路径是在宏观分析中处理结构与能动之间的关系。从方法论上来看,它力图通过制度来进行科学主义与阐释主义的结合。这种结合强调分析性选择和叙事性建构之间存在着强关联性,强调要在对案例进行系统建构的基础上对其进行加工,以便进行系统的比较。
[Abstract]:Structuralism is valued for transcending the methodological perspective of collectivism and individualism, but it was once severely criticized for ignoring initiative. In response to this criticism, that is, its own development, It has emerged a development trend and two development paths: one is that it surmounts the limitation of structuralism and tries to show the relationship between structure and dynamic, the other is from macro analysis to new historical institutionalism, which shortens the time limit of research. Limiting the system problem, compressing the scope of thinking to enhance the explanatory power, and dealing with the relationship between structure and initiative to a certain extent; another path is to deal with the relationship between structure and initiative in macro analysis. It tries to combine scientism with hermeneutics through institution, which emphasizes the strong correlation between analytical choice and narrative construction, and emphasizes the processing of cases on the basis of systematic construction. In order to carry on the systematic comparison.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学法政学院;
【基金】：上海市教委重点创新项目“比较政治学理论跟踪研究”(项目编号:11ZS165)
【分类号】：D091

【共引文献】