中国传统政体问题续谈

发布时间：2018-03-10 07:50

  本文选题：专制政体　切入点：孟德斯鸠　出处：《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：清末民初的"专制"概念有一个中性义涵,这个义涵构成了各派政治论辩的共同前提。孟德斯鸠综合了权力分置和中间阶层两点以区分政体,在方法论上具有指导意义。孟德斯鸠未及充分考虑官僚制的问题,而20世纪的政治学研究,日益把官僚制视为一个决定政体的因素。在判断政体时,亚里士多德和孟德斯鸠的"依法统治"提法,在中文语境中有含糊性,不妨以"依宪执政"之类表述取而代之。
[Abstract]:The concept of "despotism" in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China had a neutral meaning, which formed the common premise of the political debate of all parties. Montesquieu combined the separation of power and the middle class to distinguish the polity. Montesquieu failed to give full consideration to the issue of bureaucracy, and in 20th century the political science study increasingly regarded bureaucracy as a determinant of the regime. Aristotle and Montesquieu's reference to "rule by law" is ambiguous in Chinese context.
【作者单位】： 北京大学中国古代史研究中心;
【分类号】：D034
，

本文编号：1592411