西方的民主制度是放之四海而皆准的吗

发布时间：2018-04-19 06:36

  本文选题：贫苦农民 + 政治改革　； 参考：《杭州(周刊)》2014年06期

【摘要】：正泰国政局混乱不堪。令西方一些政治观察家皱眉头的是,在曼谷街头游行的人不是争取"一人一票",而是反对"一人一票"。因为英拉的为泰党及其前身,一贯照顾北方农村地区的贫苦农民,而农民在人数上占多数,所以,如果"一人一票"地选举,为泰党总是赢。反对党指责英拉和他信利用农民来维护自己的政治地位,要求先"政治改革"再举行选举,这实质上是要否定"一人一票",而由各行各业的精英组成"人民议会"。
[Abstract]:Thailand is in a state of political chaos.Some Western political observers frown that instead of fighting for "one person, one vote" in Bangkok's streets, they oppose "one person, one vote."Because Yingluck's Thai Party and its predecessor always cared for the poor peasants in the rural areas of the north, and the number of peasants was the majority, if the "one person, one vote" elections were held, the Thai Party would always win.The opposition accused Ms Yingluck and Mr Thaksin of using farmers to defend their political status, demanding "political reform" before elections were held. This was essentially a denial of "one person, one vote" and a "people's parliament" of elites from all sectors.
【作者单位】： 新华社世界问题研究中心;
【分类号】：D035
，

本文编号：1771982