共同体思想视域下的中国现代政治价值选择
[Abstract]:Political value is the reflection of different political interests. Political value has the characteristics of historicity, situational, regional and abstract. Different time and space backgrounds, historical and cultural traditions, social situations will produce different political values, but in the context of globalization and informationization, in the past, isolated communities have little influence on each other. Political values are bound to adapt to the changing social realities and reflect a certain degree of theoretical advance. Political modernization is not only reflected in the design and operation of the system, but more importantly, it must have a set of political values with modern flavor.
In the context of the economic crisis, people do not reflect on the liberal concept; while China is in the process of modernization, the developed countries began to reflect on the modernization itself; whether the Confucian concept that once ruled China for thousands of years has vitality, whether China's progress is bound to be at the cost of the complete abandonment of Confucian ideas, and so on are highlighted. The abstraction of value makes the interpretation of value highly subjective. The interpretation of political value from the perspective of community provides us with a new perspective. On the one hand, the emergence of communism as a school is relatively late, and the perspective it provides is somewhat novel. On the other hand, when discussing political value from the perspective of community, we can avoid the dichotomy of either liberal perspective or traditional Confucian cultural perspective when discussing the alternative resources of Chinese modern political value, and the idea of community can well link up the western community, Confucianism and Marxism.
Starting from the reality of the great transformation of Chinese society, this paper takes the idea of community as the main thread throughout the article. Finally, it studies and judges the options of Chinese modern political value, thus constituting the basic framework of the article, as follows:
The introduction mainly expounds the social background and social significance of the study of Chinese modern political value, explores the causes of the problem, what kind of value-based, alternative value sets and so on, evaluates the general situation of academic research on communism, Confucian communitarianism and values, defines relevant concepts, and introduces the purpose of the study. Innovations and shortcomings.
The first chapter mainly discusses the background of China's social transformation. In a word, the background China is facing includes the following aspects: the establishment of the market economic system, the long historical tradition, the advanced and backward international environment, the domestic environment of the powerful country and the weak society, the socialist political system, and the reconstruction. These six factors provide the motive force and alternative value set for the choice of modern political value in China, and are the prerequisite for the choice of modern political value.
Chapter Two explores the Western Communitarianism in detail. This paper interprets communitarianism from the perspective of the comparison between communitarianism and liberalism, and divides their arguments into three parts: the individual-based and the community-based, justice takes precedence over good and good over justice, state neutrality and state activeness. The development of corporatism can be found that ancient Greek polis, democracy and Roman Republic are the ideological roots of modern communism. Although it came into being relatively late, it has a deep historical foundation. Its value is not simply reflected in being a critic of liberalism, on the contrary, communism and Roman republicanism are the ideological roots of modern communism. Liberalism constitutes a cultural tradition of the West and is a complement to liberalism.
The third chapter studies Confucianism.Because of the inseparability of politics and ethics in ancient China,political thought and philosophical thought are intertwined.The article holds that when interpreting Confucianism,it is necessary to distinguish institutional Confucianism from ideological Confucianism.This article focuses on Ideological Confucianism.Because Confucianism has a long history,this chapter is based on Confucianism in China. It can be simply divided into the Yuan Dynasty (mainly pre-Qin Dynasty), the developing period (Han to Ming Dynasty), and the late Ming Dynasty. Confucian political thought contains positive factors that transcend the times. These factors do not lag behind with the development of the times. They are embodied in the emphasis on the rule of virtue, harmonious relations and personal moral cultivation. Not to be overlooked.
The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of Marx's communitarianism.Marx's communitarianism is based on the Marxist "human" concept.A comprehensive analysis shows that Marxists put forward three kinds of communities:natural community,illusory community and real community.Among them,real community is the ideal social state of Marxism. The thought of communitarianism expresses distinct national thought, just thought and free thought. These thoughts are an important part of Marxism and also the ideological source of modern Chinese political value.
Based on the analysis of the first four chapters, the fifth chapter firstly explores the present situation of Chinese social value, which is manifested by the loss of core values and the weakening of core political values as a part of social values. In addition, these six values should also be the core elements of constructing China's political value system.
The conclusion makes clear that the choice of Chinese modern political value must be combined with the construction of socialist core value system, and promotes the construction of Chinese modern political value system under the guidance of socialist core value system. However, in the process of research, we are confronted with such dilemmas as complex and diverse values, communitarianism, Confucian communitarianism, space-time differences of Marxist communitarianism, complexity and diversity of China's national conditions, which constitute the potential factors to weaken the research results.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈周旺;论共同体主义对当代西方自由主义的批判[J];现代哲学;2000年02期
2 李建兵;共同体主义:批判中寻求存续空间[J];广西社会科学;2004年03期
3 王曰美;近30年儒家政治思想研究[J];广西社会科学;2004年06期
4 王曰美;近三十年儒家政治思想研究[J];烟台师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年04期
5 胡伟希;;“社群主义”析义[J];新视野;2006年01期
6 龚群;;德沃金的共同体观念[J];伦理学研究;2010年04期
7 赵俊;;国际关系中的共同体与共同体主义[J];世界经济与政治;2008年12期
8 李义天;;共同体与公民美德[J];天津行政学院学报;2009年03期
9 张学军;;欧洲的共同体与共同体主义[J];中国图书评论;2010年07期
10 崔世广;日本传统文化对现代化的双重作用[J];日本研究;1995年02期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 秦越存;;现代性伦理危机与西方共同体主义的困境[A];“第二届中国伦理学青年论坛”暨“首届中国伦理学十大杰出青年学者颁奖大会”论文集[C];2012年
2 王凌云;;论保护[A];全国“当代西方哲学的新进展”学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2008年
3 东方朔;;德性论与儒家伦理[A];当代中国:发展·安全·价值——第二届(2004年度)上海市社会科学界学术年会文集 (下)[C];2004年
4 周菲;;当代欧美公共哲学研究述评[A];繁荣·和谐·振兴——辽宁省哲学社会科学首届学术年会获奖成果文集[C];2007年
5 陈惠雄;;主义与问题:新自由主义辨析——兼论“主体-社会”互构的人本经济哲学理论向度[A];中华外国经济学说研究会第十四次学术讨论会论文摘要文集[C];2006年
6 秦越存;;解决现代西方伦理危机的实践哲学进路[A];中国伦理学三十年——中国伦理学会第七次全国会员代表大会暨学术讨论会论文汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 张波邋施燕秋;“和谐太湖”该如何构建?[N];苏州日报;2007年
2 资琳;契约的死亡与重生[N];检察日报;2005年
3 钟国兴;“率先”的使命与新的探索[N];学习时报;2006年
4 熊宗哲;坚持法治与德治相结合[N];湖南日报;2001年
5 吉林省委党校研究员 蒋京议;科学建立社会主义核心价值体系需要处理好三个关系[N];中国经济时报;2009年
6 夏巍 山东大学马克思主义学院;查尔斯·泰勒的思想肖像[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
7 信浮研究院研究员 秋风;我们需要“适度的”福利体系[N];中国经营报;2010年
8 彭国华;商谈伦理学的价值与现实际遇[N];人民日报;2009年
9 西北民族大学管理学院教授 王泽民;晏婴的经济管理思想[N];甘肃日报;2009年
10 本报记者 袁婷;“孔子热”引发国学争论[N];民主与法制时报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 臧豪杰;共同体思想视域下的中国现代政治价值选择[D];中共中央党校;2012年
2 葛红梅;桑德尔公共哲学思想研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
3 杨帆;自然权利理论研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
4 韩升;查尔斯·泰勒对共同体生活的追求[D];复旦大学;2008年
5 郭台辉;齐格蒙特·鲍曼思想中的个体与政治[D];复旦大学;2006年
6 杨晓畅;多元社会的正义事业[D];吉林大学;2011年
7 胡道玖;可行能力:阿马蒂亚·森经济伦理方法研究[D];苏州大学;2006年
8 李义天;当代美德伦理学研究:关于伦理多样性的论证与辩护[D];清华大学;2006年
9 孟庆垒;环境责任论[D];中国海洋大学;2008年
10 张奇峰;以“道德自我”概念为核心的杜威道德哲学研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王溪;儒家政治思想的实践困境[D];中国政法大学;2011年
2 杜春萍;论曹一士的儒家政治社会主张[D];东北师范大学;2008年
3 周运;论徐复观的融通民主观及其当代价值[D];广西师范大学;2012年
4 毕建宏;苏格兰启蒙运动中的商业秩序与公民美德[D];北京大学;2006年
5 杨彦斌;追寻美德[D];西北大学;2009年
6 裴森;经济全球化和全球伦理——“普世价值”问题的理性省思[D];南京大学;2011年
7 王栋;正义首要性思想:批判与建构[D];四川省社会科学院;2008年
8 张赫然;儒家政治伦理的现代行政伦理价值[D];长春工业大学;2012年
9 郁靖子;寻求公民德性[D];浙江大学;2012年
10 刘畅;国际商事仲裁的社会基础[D];西南政法大学;2004年
本文编号:2216295
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2216295.html