威权主义的韧性:理论解释及其局限
发布时间：2019-02-25 14:38
【摘要】：第三波民主化已经过去四十余年,威权主义国家仍然是国际社会中的重要组成部分,并表现出顽强的生命力。这一现实迫使当代西方比较政治学家修正现代化理论和民主转型理论并对威权主义的韧性进行系统研究。政治制度和国家能力两种研究路径试图解释当代威权主义国家何以能够克服国内外治理危机并得以延续发展;然而也存在局限性,即二者之间缺乏理论对话与联系、过于注重制度结构因素而轻视意识形态等政治文化因素、严重忽视国际环境因素对威权主义韧性的深刻影响等。威权主义的意识形态与韧性研究、民主包围与威权主义国际互动研究也许是威权主义韧性研究的未来方向。
[Abstract]:Forty years have passed since the third wave of democratization, authoritarian countries are still an important part of the international community, and show tenacious vitality. This reality forces contemporary comparative political scientists to revise modernization theory and democratic transformation theory and systematically study the resilience of authoritarianism. The political system and the national capacity try to explain why the contemporary authoritarian countries can overcome the crisis of governance at home and abroad and continue to develop. However, there are limitations, that is, the lack of theoretical dialogue and connection between the two, too much attention to institutional structure factors while ignoring ideology and other political and cultural factors, seriously ignoring the profound impact of international environmental factors on the toughness of authoritarianism, and so on. The research on ideology and toughness of authoritarianism and the international interaction between democratic encirclement and authoritarianism may be the future direction of the study of authoritarian resilience.
【作者单位】： 华中师范大学政治与国际关系学院;
【分类号】：D03
本文编号：2430278
[Abstract]:Forty years have passed since the third wave of democratization, authoritarian countries are still an important part of the international community, and show tenacious vitality. This reality forces contemporary comparative political scientists to revise modernization theory and democratic transformation theory and systematically study the resilience of authoritarianism. The political system and the national capacity try to explain why the contemporary authoritarian countries can overcome the crisis of governance at home and abroad and continue to develop. However, there are limitations, that is, the lack of theoretical dialogue and connection between the two, too much attention to institutional structure factors while ignoring ideology and other political and cultural factors, seriously ignoring the profound impact of international environmental factors on the toughness of authoritarianism, and so on. The research on ideology and toughness of authoritarianism and the international interaction between democratic encirclement and authoritarianism may be the future direction of the study of authoritarian resilience.
【作者单位】： 华中师范大学政治与国际关系学院;
【分类号】：D03
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 尹保云;;威权主义的历史意义[J];炎黄春秋;2012年05期
2 史蒂文·列维茨基;卢肯·A.威;李莉;邓鹏;;没有民主的选举:竞争性威权主义的兴起[J];国外理论动态;2013年06期
3 季乃礼;张振华;;心理层面的威权主义辨析[J];比较政治学研究;2011年01期
4 季乃礼;;埃特米耶的右翼威权主义理论探析[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2009年03期
5 许瑶;;威权主义:概念、发展与困境[J];国外理论动态;2013年12期
6 马克·比森;冉冉;;环境威权主义的到来[J];中国治理评论;2012年02期
7 康慨;;政治转型的时机[J];中国新闻周刊;2012年17期
8 Axel Hadenius;Jan Teorell;王正绪;宿亮;;离开威权主义后的演进路径[J];开放时代;2010年01期
9 张长东;;混合型政体与威权主义韧性研究[J];国外理论动态;2014年05期
10 曾丽红;;威权主义政权合法性危机探析[J];理论观察;2007年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘德源;威权主义政治合法性危机问题研究[D];河北大学;2013年
2 马永振;现代化视野中的威权政治研究[D];山东大学;2009年
，本文编号：2430278
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2430278.html
