邓小平、习近平反特权思想比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 22:30

本文选题：邓小平　切入点：习近平　出处：《广西大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：反特权是中国共产党一贯坚持的主张,并坚决反对干部特权,积极进行反特权斗争。在全面从严治党、全面依法治国,着力营造良好政治生态的背景下,分析邓小平、习近平反特权思想比较研究,对于当前加强党风廉政建设和反腐败斗争、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化具有重要的意义。邓小平反特权思想讲述改革开放必须反特权,并从损害党的威信和形象、脱离群众、党风廉政建设受阻这几个方面来分析特权的危害性。依据领导干部的官僚主义作风、职务终身制、生活待遇特殊化来归纳干部特权化的表现,从思想根源、历史文化根源、制度根源和体制根源这四个角度去论述特权得以产生的缘由。在此基础上,邓小平提出要加强思想政治教育、进行政治体制改革和加强法制建设的特权治理措施。习近平反特权思想主要从悖离党的宗旨、滋生放纵腐败行为、破坏社会公平正义的视角去说明特权危害,深入分析特权的新特点,主要表现为隐蔽化和形式多样化,探究干部特权一直无法根除的原因,总结为部分领导干部缺乏正确的政治理想信仰、民主监督机制不健全、处罚特权行为的力度不够等因素。最后从构筑牢固的思想防线、通过政治体制改革规范和约束权力、以法治清除干部特权这几个方面来进行反特权治理。通过比较分析邓小平、习近平反特权思想的共同点和不同点,总结得出两者反特权思想的相同点表现在理论来源的一致性、相同的出发点和归宿,但其不同点表现在治理干部特权方法上有所差异,习近平反特权思想又继承和发展邓小平的反特权思想。同时,邓小平与习近平反特权思想的比较也为当前加强党风廉政建设,正确认识特权思想和特权现象提供有益的实践意义:一是反特权是保持党的先进性和纯洁性的重要途径;二是反特权需强化群众监督,提升群众参与积极性;三是反特权要注重顶层设计,加强整体推进;四是反特权的路径日渐完善。从而,推动反特权治理的系统性和实效性。
[Abstract]:Anti-privilege is the consistent stand of the Communist Party of China, and resolutely opposes the privileges of cadres and actively carries out the struggle against privileges. Under the background of administering the party strictly in an all-round way, administering the country according to law in an all-round way, and making efforts to create a good political environment, Deng Xiaoping is analyzed. The comparative study of Xi Jinping's anti-privilege thought is of great significance for strengthening the construction of party style and clean government and the struggle against corruption, promoting the modernization of national governance system and governing ability. And from the aspects of damaging the party's prestige and image, separating itself from the masses and obstructing the building of a clean and honest party, the harm of privileges is analyzed. According to the bureaucratic style of leading cadres and the tenure system of posts, The special treatment of life is used to sum up the manifestation of the privilege of cadres, and to discuss the causes of the privilege from the four angles of ideological origin, historical and cultural origin, system root and system root. On this basis, Deng Xiaoping has proposed to strengthen ideological and political education, carry out political system reform, and strengthen the measures of privilege management for the construction of the legal system. Xi Jinping's anti-privilege thought mainly runs counter to the purpose of leaving the party and breeds and indulges in corrupt behavior. The perspective of destroying social fairness and justice to explain the harm of privileges, in-depth analysis of the new characteristics of privileges, mainly in the form of concealment and diversification, to explore the reasons why the privileges of cadres can not be eradicated. It is concluded that some leading cadres lack the correct political ideal belief, the democratic supervision mechanism is not perfect, the punishment privilege behavior is not strong enough and so on. Finally, through the reform of the political system, we should build a solid ideological defense line and regulate and restrain the power through the political system reform. Through comparative analysis of the common points and differences of Deng Xiaoping and Xi Jinping's anti-privilege thoughts, it is concluded that the similarities and differences between the two anti-privilege thoughts are manifested in the consistency of theoretical sources. The same starting point and end result, but the difference is that there are differences in the methods of managing the privileges of cadres, Xi Jinping's anti-privilege thought inherits and develops Deng Xiaoping's anti-privilege thought. At the same time, The comparison between Deng Xiaoping and Xi Jinping's anti-privilege thought also provides beneficial practical significance for strengthening the construction of party style and clean government and correctly understanding the phenomenon of privilege and privilege: first, anti-privilege is an important way to maintain the Party's progressiveness and purity; Second, the anti-privilege should strengthen the supervision of the masses and promote the enthusiasm of the masses; third, the anti-privilege should pay attention to the top-level design and strengthen the overall promotion; fourth, the path of anti-privilege is becoming more and more perfect, so as to promote the systematization and effectiveness of anti-privilege governance.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D262.6;A849

【相似文献】