事实推定在知识产权案中侵权主体认定适用的问题及对策

发布时间：2018-03-24 17:37

本文选题：事实推定　切入点：知识产权案　出处：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在知识产权司法审判中,被控侵权人往往会针对被控侵权产品与其自身的关联性或被控侵权产品并非假冒产品进行抗辩,同时这也是在诸多知识产权司法审判中事实认定的基础性问题。所以这就引出了一个关键问题,当被控侵权产品的直接销售行为确定,而对于直接制造商(生产者)是不确定的,怎样确定侵权主体,就是本文需讨论的问题,即事实推定在知识产权案中侵权主体认定适用的问题及对策。本文首先分析知识产权侵权主体认定的困境,用“中粮”案例来引出侵权主体认定的困境;再通过分析知识产权诉讼中的特殊性来体现出知识产权案件侵权主体推定的前提条件;但法院在运用事实推定也存在“两难”境地,推定或不推定都会对双方当事人造成不利影响。分析了事实推定的现实困境后,通过具体案例的审判推定形式来研究法院是如何运用事实推定的,再把这些案例的侵权主体信息进行梳理或类型化,来整理出法院对侵权主体认定的衡量标准;再通过案件审判运用事实推定对当事人所带来的后续影响,即诉讼成本、声誉影响、承担实体责任等,来证明事实推定急需建立统一适用标准的紧迫性。最后通过事实推定在立法上的完善,事实推定在司法实践中的适用规则以及事实推定对侵权主体认定的适用条件三部分提出对知识产权案中侵权主体认定的对策,这些建议是为了统一裁判标准,规范法官对案件的自由裁量,防止事实推定的滥用。
[Abstract]:In the judicial trial of intellectual property rights, the accused infringer often defends the relevance of the alleged infringing product to himself or the alleged infringing product is not a counterfeit product, At the same time, this is also a fundamental issue of fact determination in many intellectual property judicial trials. So this leads to a key issue, when the direct sale of the alleged infringing product is determined, For the direct manufacturer (producer) is uncertain, how to determine the subject of infringement is the issue to be discussed in this paper. Firstly, this paper analyzes the dilemma of the subject of intellectual property infringement, and uses the case of "Cofco" to lead to the dilemma of the subject of infringement; Through the analysis of the particularity of intellectual property litigation to reflect the premise of the presumption of infringement subject in intellectual property cases, but the court in the use of the presumption of fact also exists in a "dilemma", After analyzing the realistic predicament of the presumption of fact, this paper studies how the court applies the presumption of fact through the form of the presumption of trial in a specific case. Then combing or classifying the information of the tort subject in these cases to sort out the standard of the court's determination of the tortious subject, and then applying the presumption of fact to the parties through the trial of the case, that is, the cost of litigation, In order to prove the urgency of establishing the uniform applicable standard for the presumption of facts, it is urgent to establish a unified standard. Finally, through the perfection of the legislation of the presumption of fact, The applicable rules of the presumption of fact in judicial practice and the applicable conditions of the presumption of fact to the subject of infringement put forward the countermeasures to the subject of infringement in the case of intellectual property rights. These suggestions are aimed at unifying the standard of adjudication. Regulate the judge's discretion in the case and prevent the abuse of the presumption of fact.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】