技侦材料在毒品犯罪案件审判中作为证据使用问题实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-27 08:20

本文选题：毒品犯罪　切入点：技侦材料　出处：《四川省社会科学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着2012年《刑事诉讼法》(以下统称新《刑事诉讼法》)的修改,为顺应新形势下打击毒品犯罪的现实需要,用于证明案件事实的技术侦查措施获取的材料(以下简称技侦材料),经过法院核实采纳,可直接作为诉讼证据使用,继而经法院核实认定作为定案根据。根据新《刑事诉讼法》第48条之规定,诉讼证据,就毒品犯罪案件而言,系指公安机关依照法定的程序收集并固定,能够证明毒品犯罪案件真实情况的材料,而技侦材料在毒品犯罪案件审判实务中作为证据使用,主要是指作为定案根据加以使用。就技侦材料作为毒品犯罪案件定案根据使用指涉的内容,笔者认为,主要涵摄程序和实体两个层面:程序层面,集中体现在庭审质证程序上,而实体上,则包括技侦材料在毒品犯罪案件中作为定案根据证据能力的审查判断、证明力的审查判断(包括作为定罪证据、量刑证据的应用),以及法院对证据的采纳。本文基于对技侦材料作为定案根据基本语义的理解,结合其在毒品犯罪案件司法实践中的应用进行问题探讨。技侦材料作为证明毒品犯罪案件事实的有效补充,在侦查过程中被公安机关广泛应用,但桎梏于我国立法体制和现实土壤,技侦材料作为定案根据在毒品犯罪案件审判实务中一直存在问题,致使技侦材料的应用步履维艰,争议不断。契合当前我国庭审实质化改革背景,本文试着从技侦材料作为定案根据在毒品犯罪案件中的实务使用出发,对其中涉及技侦材料作为定案根据的庭审质证方式、技侦材料作为定案根据证据能力的审查判断、证明力的审查判断(包括作为定罪证据、量刑证据的应用),以及法院对证据的采纳进行一定的问题研究,重点阐述庭审阶段技侦材料作为定案根据的应用问题,本文共分为三个部分:第一章:技侦措施的范围界定与技侦材料的审查问题。因技侦措施采取的不同,相应获取的技侦材料审查判断侧重点也不尽相同,于此,本部分重点对技侦措施在我国的应用进行一定的范围界定,认为包括通讯监听、秘密拍照及秘密录音录像、隐匿身份侦查(如诱惑侦查)、特情介入(如线人)、控制下交付等技术侦查手段,同时归纳技侦材料具有与其他证据材料不同的特点,并述及不同类型技侦材料审查判断的重点所在,以及揭露理论层面存在的问题。第二章:审判实务中技侦材料作为定案根据的应用现状考察。首先阐述了毒品犯罪的特征。毒品犯罪具有与其他类型刑事犯罪案件不同的特点,表现为毒品犯罪案件从侦查收集证据材料到最终法庭审理证据材料的使用都有其独特之处。同时通过统计新《刑事诉讼法》修订以来中国裁判文书网上公布的技侦材料在毒品犯罪一审案件中作为定案根据的应用情况及实践中存在的问题。归纳言之,笔者认为,可分为程序与实体两个层面。程序层面,集中体现在技侦材料作为定案根据的庭审质证设计上,实体而言,则包括技侦材料作为定案根据证据能力的审查判断、证明力的审查判断(作为定罪证据、量刑证据的应用),以及法院对证据的采纳与否等方面。第三章:技侦材料作为定案根据使用的完善建议。该部分顺应庭审实质化改革之势而动,结合我国毒品犯罪案件审判实务,分别从程序与实体层面展开论述。具体言之,包括明确技侦材料的使用范围、完善技侦材料现行质证方式,特别是对技侦材料作为定案根据的庭外核实程序进行了建构,明晰技侦材料作为定案根据证据能力的审查判断、规范证明力的审查判断(包括作为定罪证据、量刑证据的应用),以及完善法院对证据的采纳规则,让法庭正义以人们看得见的方式实现。
[Abstract]:With the 2012 "Criminal Procedure Law" (hereinafter referred to as the new "criminal procedural law") modified to adapt to the new situation to fight against drug crimes in reality, used to obtain measures of technical investigation prove the facts of the case materials (hereinafter referred to as technical investigation materials), after the court to verify the adoption, can be directly used as evidence in litigation, and then as a final decision by the court to verify that according to the new criminal procedure law. According to the < > forty-eighth regulation, litigation evidence, drug crime case, refers to the public security organs in accordance with the legal procedures were collected and fixed, drug crime can prove the real situation of the case materials, and technical investigation materials in practice as a trial of drug crime the use of evidence, mainly refers to the use of it. As a final decision according to the technical investigation materials as drug crime case verdict according to the use of referential content, the author thinks that the main subsumtion procedure and entity layer two Surface: program level, embodied in the court hearing procedure, and the entity, including technical investigation materials as the verdict based on the evidence the ability to review the drug-related criminal cases, judge the probative force (including conviction as evidence, sentencing evidence, the court on the application) and the adoption of evidence. In this paper. According to the investigation material as the verdict on the basis of understanding the basic semantics, combined with its application in drug crime cases in the judicial practice problems discussed. Technical investigation materials as evidenced by effective supplement of drug crime case, the public security organs have been widely used in the course of the investigation, but limited to the legislative system in our country and the reality of the soil, Jizhen as material according to the existing problems in the practice has been a trial of drug crime, resulting in the application of technical investigation materials said of an aged person, with current controversy. The essence of the trial reform of the background of this paper. Try from the technical investigation materials as the verdict according to the practice in drug crime cases of the related technical investigation materials as yet based on cross examination method, technical investigation materials as the verdict based on the evidence ability examination, judgment of probative force (including conviction as evidence, sentencing evidence, and application) the adoption of the evidence of the trial focused on technical investigation materials as finalized according to the application, this paper is divided into three parts: Chapter One: the definition of the scope of technical investigation review of measures and technical investigation materials. Because of the different measures taken to the technical investigation, technical investigation materials examination the corresponding focus is not the same, for this, this part focuses on the measures of technical investigation in our country certain scope, including communication monitor, camera and video recording secret secret, hidden Anonymous identity investigation (such as the temptation investigation), special intervention (such as informants), under the control of delivery and other technical means of investigation, also summarized the technical investigation material has different characteristics with other evidence, and the key to determine the types and technical investigation materials review the theory and Neo exposing level problems. The second chapter: the technical investigation and trial practice materials as the verdict application according to the status quo of study. First elaborates the characteristics of drug crime. Drug crime has different characteristics from other types of criminal cases, for drug-related criminal cases collected from the investigation certificate according to the use of materials to the final court of evidence has its uniqueness. At the same time the new statistics "since the amendment of Criminal Procedure Law > China judgment documents published online technical investigation materials as the application according to the existing decision and practice questions in the trial of drug crime cases. To be, I think, can be divided into two aspects of entity and procedure. The procedure level, embodied in the technical investigation materials as the verdict court hearing according to the design, entities, including technical investigation materials as the verdict based on the evidence ability examination, proof examination judgment (used as evidence for conviction sentencing evidence, as well as the court), the adoption of evidence and other aspects. The third chapter: the technical investigation materials as the verdict according to the use of the suggestions. This part conforms to the essence of the trial reform of the situation and move, combined with the case of drug crime in our country judicial practice, respectively from the aspects of procedure and entity specific words. Clearly, including technical investigation materials use, improve the existing quality / technical investigation materials, especially for technical investigation materials as the verdict of court according to the verification procedures of construction materials, clear Jizhen as verdict according to the evidence The ability of examination and judgement, the examination and judgement of normative proof power, including the application of sentencing evidence as a conviction evidence, and the improvement of court's adoption rules for evidence, enable Court justice to be realized in a visible way.

【学位授予单位】：四川省社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】