案外人执行异议之诉之起诉条件问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 10:18

本文选题：民事执行　切入点：执行异议　出处：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前司法实践中“执行难”和“执行乱”的现象长期存在,究其根源,与执行救济制度的缺失和不完善有着非常密切的关系。因此,为了提高执行行为的正确性、及时性及确实保障案外人的民事权利,相应的救济机制逐渐建立并完善,案外人执行异议之诉制度应运而生。从2007年民事诉讼法首次规定了案外人执行异议之诉这一制度以来,近10年时间里,司法实务在不断的探索中总结了许多有益经验,极大地促进了立法的完善,都为今后指导和规范文明的执行工作奠定了基础。但不可忽视的是,由于案外人执行异议之诉制度尚处于前期发展阶段,理论与执行实务工作的结合仍存在断层现象,契合程度不够,在我国司法实务过程中仍存在一定的问题。此诉讼制度究竟该如何运作,特别是涉及案外人执行异议之诉起诉时的一些具体问题,如执行异议前置程序是否应该存在,诉讼请求范围如何明确,案外人提起诉讼时限是否过短等问题,都还存在着争议和模糊之处。本文试图通过实务中典型案例的引入,集中分析案外人提起执行异议之诉的起诉条件在我国制度及司法实务中存在的问题及不足,并在比较借鉴的基础上,提出对该问题进行完善之建言,指出前置程序废除、诉讼事由范围具体界定和起诉时间延长的必要性和意义所在,以促进执行异议之诉在我国实践中的有效运作,实现制度设计的初衷和价值。
[Abstract]:For the future to guide and standardize the implementation of civilization laid the foundation.How should this litigation system work, especially when it comes to the specific issues involved in the execution of a complaint by an outsider, such as whether there should be a pre-procedure for the execution of an objection, and how clear the scope of the claim is?There are still some disputes and ambiguities about whether the time limit of litigation is too short.Through the introduction of typical cases in practice, this paper attempts to focus on the analysis of the problems and deficiencies in the system and judicial practice of our country, and on the basis of comparative reference,This paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect this problem, and points out the necessity and significance of repealing the pre-procedure, defining the scope of the cause of litigation and prolonging the time of prosecution, so as to promote the effective operation of the action of executive dissent in our country's practice.Realize the original intention and value of system design.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】