论商标法中的利益平衡
发布时间：2018-09-07 06:55
【摘要】：商标法应平衡各主体间利益,不应过于强调一方利益,而忽略对另一方利益的保护。与其他知识产权法相比,商标法表现出确认权利人的禁止效力大于使用效力的特点,针对这一特点,应制定标准明确、实操性强的条文对其禁止权利进行必要规制,以防止权利滥用行为的产生。应充分结合《反垄断法》、《反不正当竞争法》等法律,构建商标法的外部平衡;从保护在先权利、防止商标使用权和救济权滥用方面,构建商标法的内部平衡。本文从对商标法保护的私权利益和公共利益进行概述入手,通过实际案例分析,阐述当前我国商标法过于保护商标权人利益的情况较为严重,文章以此为切入点,引出商标法利益平衡机制,进而提出完善我国商标法利益平衡的具体措施,然而,本文措施在实践中的细致化规定需要进一步探究。
[Abstract]:The Trademark Law should balance the interests of the parties and not emphasize the interests of one party and neglect the protection of the interests of the other. Compared with other intellectual property law, Trademark Law shows that the prohibition effect of the right holder is greater than the use effect. In view of this characteristic, it is necessary to make a clear standard and strong practical provisions to regulate the prohibition right. To prevent abuse of rights. The external balance of trademark law should be constructed by combining the laws of Anti-monopoly Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law, and the internal balance of trademark law should be constructed from the aspects of protecting the prior rights and preventing the abuse of the right to use and remedy the trademark. This article begins with the outline of the private and public interests protected by trademark law, and through the analysis of actual cases, expounds that the situation of trademark law too protecting the interests of trademark owners is more serious at present, which is regarded as the breakthrough point of the article. This paper introduces the mechanism of trademark law's interest balance, and then puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the balance of trademark law's interests. However, the detailed regulation of this article's measures in practice needs to be further explored.
【学位授予单位】：长春理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.43
本文编号：2227525
[Abstract]:The Trademark Law should balance the interests of the parties and not emphasize the interests of one party and neglect the protection of the interests of the other. Compared with other intellectual property law, Trademark Law shows that the prohibition effect of the right holder is greater than the use effect. In view of this characteristic, it is necessary to make a clear standard and strong practical provisions to regulate the prohibition right. To prevent abuse of rights. The external balance of trademark law should be constructed by combining the laws of Anti-monopoly Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law, and the internal balance of trademark law should be constructed from the aspects of protecting the prior rights and preventing the abuse of the right to use and remedy the trademark. This article begins with the outline of the private and public interests protected by trademark law, and through the analysis of actual cases, expounds that the situation of trademark law too protecting the interests of trademark owners is more serious at present, which is regarded as the breakthrough point of the article. This paper introduces the mechanism of trademark law's interest balance, and then puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the balance of trademark law's interests. However, the detailed regulation of this article's measures in practice needs to be further explored.
【学位授予单位】：长春理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.43
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 黄汇;;商标法中的公共利益及其保护——以“微信”商标案为对象的逻辑分析与法理展开[J];法学;2015年10期
2 张韬略;张伟君;;《商标法》维护公共利益的路径选择——兼谈禁止“具有不良影响”标志注册条款的适用[J];知识产权;2015年04期
3 赵晓秋;王会青;;“微信”商标案的“三国杀”[J];法律与生活;2015年08期
4 姬晨笛;;论公共利益与商标权的冲突与协调——澳大利亚《烟草简单包装法》评析[J];知识经济;2014年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 涂龙文;论商标被动使用下的利益保护问题[D];江西财经大学;2014年
2 彭茜尧;论商标侵权的认定标准及其判定[D];湖南大学;2014年
3 亓培培;商标法价值的反思与重构[D];暨南大学;2013年
4 方玲玲;我国商标法价值平衡制度的反思与完善[D];中国政法大学;2011年
5 郑旋律;我国商标法功能的缺陷及完善研究[D];华中科技大学;2010年
6 李燕;商标权的扩张与规制[D];华东政法大学;2008年
，本文编号：2227525
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2227525.html
