拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪研究
发布时间：2019-02-25 10:02
【摘要】：由于计算机技术的迅速普及并被广泛运用于我们生活的方方面面,今天的社会早已变成了“天网恢恢”的网络世纪。物联网或“互联网+”大数据时代的来临,更使我们的全部生活与信息网络紧紧联系在一起。网络安全乃是一个关系到国家安全、社会公共安全、国家和公民财产安全、个人生活以及信息安全的极其重大的社会问题,国家必须加大对信息网络安全的保护力度。为了有效地管理网络安全秩序,我国已经先后出台了诸多有关信息网络安全管理的法律法规,它们中的大多数具有行政法律法规性质,也包括有关刑法性质的规定。但是客观而言,我国原有立法并不足以有效地对繁纷复杂的网络违法犯罪进行打击与防范。有鉴于此,作为《刑法》第286条之一,《刑法修正案(九)》第28条新增设了拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪。本文立足于传统四要件对拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪进行全面的解析,从而明确罪与非罪之间的界限。本文首先从犯罪的客体着手,在论证网络空间具有公共属性的基础上,结合《刑法》286条之一的规定以及相关规范性文件,从而得出拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪客体的具体内涵;其次是对该罪的客观方面进行分析,这也是本文的重点内容。笔者通过与行政法、网络安全法相衔接的方式,对监管部门的范围和责令采取改正措施拒不改正两大客观要素进行相关界定,尤其是对行政前置性规定的合理性做出判断,并对违法信息大量传播、用户信息的含义和泄露、严重后果的理解、情节严重的把握进行量化分析,以达到出罪与入罪标准相对明确化的效果;再次是对该罪的犯罪主体从相关规范性文件的规定以及我国学界有关观点的角度出发,对网络服务提供者的概念、分类以及与网络服务提供商的区别着手,提出刑法意义上的网络服务提供者应当分为网络接入服务提供者、网络内容服务提供者、网络平台服务提供者;从次是对该罪主体的主观方面进行分析,论证犯罪主体应存有故意的主观要素,并分析行为主体存在违法性认识错误的情况下不同的处理模式。最后是对该罪在实体上没有犯罪未遂状态、共犯责任模式以及程序上的管辖问题进行相关分析,从而能够对拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪全面、详细的论述。
[Abstract]:Due to the rapid popularization of computer technology and widely used in all aspects of our lives, today's society has become a network century. Internet of things or "Internet" big data era, more closely linked to all our life and information network. Network security is an extremely important social problem related to national security, social public security, national and citizen property security, personal life and information security. The state must strengthen the protection of information network security. In order to effectively manage the order of network security, China has issued many laws and regulations on information network security management, most of which have the nature of administrative laws and regulations, including the provisions of criminal law. But objectively speaking, the original legislation of our country is not enough to effectively crack down and prevent the numerous and complicated network crimes. In view of this, as one of the 286 article of the Criminal Law, Article 28 of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) adds the crime of refusing to fulfill the duty of information network security management. This article bases on the traditional four elements to refuse to fulfill the information network security management duty crime carries on the comprehensive analysis, thus clears the boundary between the crime and the non-crime. This paper begins with the object of crime, on the basis of demonstrating that cyberspace has public attributes, combining with the provisions of one of the 286 articles of the Criminal Law and related normative documents, The concrete connotation of the object of the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management is obtained. The second is the analysis of the objective aspects of the crime, which is also the focus of this article. By connecting with administrative law and network security law, the author defines the scope of regulatory department and the order to take corrective measures to refuse to correct the two objective elements, especially the rationality of administrative preemptive provisions. And carry on the quantitative analysis to the illegal information massive dissemination, the user information meaning and the leakage, the serious consequence understanding, the plot serious grasp carries on the quantification analysis, in order to achieve the crime and the incriminate standard relatively clear effect; Thirdly, from the point of view of the relevant normative documents and the related viewpoints of the academic circles of our country, the author sets about the concept, classification and the difference between the network service provider and the network service provider. The network service provider in criminal law should be divided into network access service provider, network content service provider and network platform service provider. This paper analyzes the subjective aspects of the subject of the crime, demonstrates that the subject of the crime should have intentional subjective elements, and analyzes the different treatment models of the subject in the case of illegality. Finally, the author makes a related analysis on the criminal attempt state, the mode of accomplice responsibility and the jurisdiction of procedure, so that the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management can be discussed comprehensively and in detail.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2018
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2430057
[Abstract]:Due to the rapid popularization of computer technology and widely used in all aspects of our lives, today's society has become a network century. Internet of things or "Internet" big data era, more closely linked to all our life and information network. Network security is an extremely important social problem related to national security, social public security, national and citizen property security, personal life and information security. The state must strengthen the protection of information network security. In order to effectively manage the order of network security, China has issued many laws and regulations on information network security management, most of which have the nature of administrative laws and regulations, including the provisions of criminal law. But objectively speaking, the original legislation of our country is not enough to effectively crack down and prevent the numerous and complicated network crimes. In view of this, as one of the 286 article of the Criminal Law, Article 28 of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) adds the crime of refusing to fulfill the duty of information network security management. This article bases on the traditional four elements to refuse to fulfill the information network security management duty crime carries on the comprehensive analysis, thus clears the boundary between the crime and the non-crime. This paper begins with the object of crime, on the basis of demonstrating that cyberspace has public attributes, combining with the provisions of one of the 286 articles of the Criminal Law and related normative documents, The concrete connotation of the object of the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management is obtained. The second is the analysis of the objective aspects of the crime, which is also the focus of this article. By connecting with administrative law and network security law, the author defines the scope of regulatory department and the order to take corrective measures to refuse to correct the two objective elements, especially the rationality of administrative preemptive provisions. And carry on the quantitative analysis to the illegal information massive dissemination, the user information meaning and the leakage, the serious consequence understanding, the plot serious grasp carries on the quantification analysis, in order to achieve the crime and the incriminate standard relatively clear effect; Thirdly, from the point of view of the relevant normative documents and the related viewpoints of the academic circles of our country, the author sets about the concept, classification and the difference between the network service provider and the network service provider. The network service provider in criminal law should be divided into network access service provider, network content service provider and network platform service provider. This paper analyzes the subjective aspects of the subject of the crime, demonstrates that the subject of the crime should have intentional subjective elements, and analyzes the different treatment models of the subject in the case of illegality. Finally, the author makes a related analysis on the criminal attempt state, the mode of accomplice responsibility and the jurisdiction of procedure, so that the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management can be discussed comprehensively and in detail.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2018
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢望原;;论拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪[J];中国法学;2017年02期
2 敬力嘉;;论拒不履行网络安全管理义务罪——以网络中介服务者的刑事责任为中心展开[J];政治与法律;2017年01期
3 葛立刚;;网络服务商不作为刑事责任的边界[J];西南政法大学学报;2016年06期
4 刘艳红;;无罪的快播与有罪的思维——“快播案”有罪论之反思与批判[J];政治与法律;2016年12期
5 刘艳红;;网络时代言论自由的刑法边界[J];中国社会科学;2016年10期
6 邱赛兰;;拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪构成特征探析[J];经济师;2016年10期
7 刘宪权;;网络犯罪的刑法应对新理念[J];政治与法律;2016年09期
8 王华伟;;网络服务提供者的刑法责任比较研究[J];环球法律评论;2016年04期
9 孙国祥;;违法性认识错误的不可避免性及其认定[J];中外法学;2016年03期
10 罗勇;;论“网络服务提供者”的法律界定——以中日比较为中心[J];学术交流;2016年06期
，本文编号：2430057
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2430057.html
