从标记词“的”的隐现与位置看汉语前加词的性质

发布时间：2018-05-28 10:23

本文选题：标记词 + “的”　；参考：《汉语学习》2011年04期

【摘要】：前加词在指称性与修饰性动词前,不带"的"的均须分析为状语,附加"的"只能认定为定语。借助于"的",前加词是作状语还是定语及其在词性上是副词还是区别词都能互相转换。另外,其后"的"与"地"的分工也并非都界限分明。前加词的状、定分布与副、区转类并没分化出不同的义项,表明实副词与区别词并非严格意义上的兼类,而是同一上位词的不同下位小类。标记词"的"的隐现与位置对充当状、定的形容词只能划分成分而不能区分词类,间接证明实副词与区别词的功能差别只是同一词类的两种不同功能。既然实副词与区别词同属一类,那么,目前归入"副词"的表示词汇义的实副词理应退出,与区别词一起合并成一类前加词。
[Abstract]:The antecedents must be analyzed as adverbials before referential and modified verbs, and the appended "can only be identified as attributives." With the aid of "the", whether the prefix is an adverbial or an attributive and whether it is an adverb or a distinguishing word in terms of part of speech can be converted to each other. In addition, the division of labor between "land" and "land" is not always distinct. The characters, definite distribution and auxiliary of the words before the addition do not differentiate into different meanings, which indicates that the real adverbs and the distinguishing words are not the two categories in the strict sense, but the different subcategories of the same upper word. The occult and position pairs of marked words act as characters, and definite adjectives can only be divided into components but not parts of speech, which indirectly proves that the functional difference between real adverbs and differentiating words is only two different functions of the same part of speech. Since the real adverbs belong to the same category as the differentiating words, the actual adverbs which are classified as "adverbs" should withdraw and merge with the differentiating words to form a kind of pre-additive words.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学语言研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(项目编号:07BYY048)“近30年来汉语虚词的发展变化及其演化趋势研究” 上海市社科项目(项目编号:2006BYY006)“语法化理论与汉语虚词的发展与演化”的专题成果之一上海市重点学科三期“汉语言文字学(S30402)”的资助
【分类号】：H146.3

【参考文献】