朝鲜韩国文体论研究的对比研究

发布时间：2019-05-16 16:10

【摘要】：文体学作为一种交叉学科,目前还不能算是一个成熟的学科,其理论框架和方法论研究仍在探索、发展之中。文体学在韩国和朝鲜的研究都较晚于语言学的其他领域。直至现代,文体学独有的学术领域及研究方向才被人们所关注,两国在文体学的研究上有了一定的发展和成果。但因韩国和朝鲜在不同的社会体制下隔绝了60多年,在不同的社会语言环境、不同的语言政策下,两个国家的文体学研究有着较大的差异。文体学的方法论基础是语言科学。首先,语言学理论对文体观有着直接的影响。其次,文体学运用语言学的方法分析语言形式的文体作用。语言学文体学研究的意义在于,它可以说是偏重于主观印象的文学文体学的补充。本文将从影响文体的各个要素,如语音、词汇、语法等方面朝韩文体学做具体比较研究。至今为止,朝鲜和韩国各自开展的文体研究为数不少,也取得了一定的成果,可是对两国文体学进行比较研究的论文却很少见。本文将朝鲜和韩国国内影响力较大的文体学著作为比较研究对象,以学界既有研究为基础,力图通过细致翔实的分析,对朝韩韩文体学研究作出综合分析和比较,找出问题,并从中摸索出文体学合理的叙述方案。本文的价值主要体现在以下三个方面。第一,在理论研究方面明确文体要素、文体学的研究对象、文体学与相关学科的区别和联系、文体学的发展方向等问题,力争有一个比较统一的认识,澄清概念上的某些混乱。第二,本文排除政治因素,从较客观的角度,通过语音、词汇、语法等语言学各个层面的综合分析,指出韩国和朝鲜文体学研究的差异和不足,为今后的文体学研究指出了方向。第三,本文统筹中朝韩三国的文体学研究,从历时研究转向共时研究,探讨了文体学研究对象和方法问题,这对掌握韩国语文体研究有着重要意义。第一章引言部分主要介绍了研究对象、研究目的以及既往研究取得的成果与不足。第二章讨论了文体的概念和分类以及修辞法的问题。为了明确文体学研究的课题,且充分发挥其效用,本章按年代先后记述了朝韩文体研究史以及具有代表性的学者。学者们所持立场、视角不同,对文体的概念存在多种定义,本文首先综合并系统介绍了至今以来学界对文体的各种定义及分类,同时就修辞法的分类以及修辞用语的模糊性作了论述。第三章在语音方面分别就清音和辅音的分析(音素分析),韵律效果(韵素分析)等问题进行了论述。在语言学领域中,语音是与意识形态距离最远的一个层面。音韵作为音声学的一部分,包含清音、辅音、音节。即使意思相近,也会因其语音特征体现出不同的文体。语音论的解释是典型的语言学研究方法论。第四章从固有词、汉字词、外来词和方言、隐语、俗语、同义词反义词同音异议词等多个方面,对韩国和朝鲜的词汇文体学进行了论述。因为文体会因文中使用较多的词汇类型而定型。而词汇的分类标准也会随着研究观点的不同而有所差异。第五章从时态、敬语法、主动与被动、文章长度、文章类型等角度分析了朝韩文体学研究。语言学文体研究应该通过对语言特征的分析,解释文学批评家或读者所指出的文体印象。文体研究如果只是停留指出语言的形式特征,而没有谈及具体文体印象的话,这就称不上文体研究,它只是词汇论、语法论、语音论的个领域而已。语法论不会涉及文体,相反文体学却可以谈及语法论。第六章结论部分对本文的主要研究内容进行了归纳总结,并指出了本文存在的局限性。韩国的文体学研究比较活跃,但文体学研究的目标和方向却各不相同,可以说没有统一的文体理论、术语和研究方法。语言学文体学的研究中,日常用语应该是首要的研究对象。但是在韩国,对文学用语的文体研究占了很大比重,对日常用语疏于研究。口语、日常用语是原始的、本质的,而文学用语是条件化的、特殊化的,文体学研究也应该与其他语言学研究领域一样,从日常口语的研究开始。朝鲜由于长时间的闭锁政策,很难接受不断发展变化的语言学理论,因此朝鲜的文体学研究呈现大同小异、千篇一律的现象。但是,朝鲜的文体学研究的价值在于把韩国疏于研究的日常用语作为研究对象。在朝鲜研究领域的不同,文体类型会有不同的分类,但是其分化程度较弱,不利于学术的多元化发展。
[Abstract]:As a cross-discipline, stylistics is not a mature subject, and its theoretical framework and methodology are still being explored and developed. The study of stylistics in South Korea and North Korea is late in other fields of linguistics. Until now, the unique academic field and the research direction of the stylistics have been paid attention to, and the two countries have some development and achievements in the study of the stylistics. But because of the different social system of Korea and North Korea for more than 60 years, under different social and linguistic environment and different language policies, the study of the stylistics of the two countries has a great difference. The methodological basis of stylistics is the Language Section. In the first place, the theory of linguistics has a direct shadow on the literary style. In the second place, the stylistics uses the method of linguistics to analyze the style of the language. The significance of the study of the stylistics in linguistics is that it can be said to be a complement to the literary stylistics of the subjective impression. In this paper, we will make a concrete comparative study on the various elements of the influence style, such as voice, vocabulary, grammar and so on. So far, there have been a lot of research on the style of the Korean and South Korea, and some achievements have been made, but there are few papers on the comparative study between the two countries. This paper, based on the existing research, tries to make a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the study of the Korean and Korean stylistics through detailed and detailed analysis, and find out the question. In this paper, the author finds out the reasonable narration of the stylistics. The value of this article is mainly reflected in the following three First, in the field of theoretical research, we should make a clear and unified understanding and clarify some concepts on the basis of the clear stylistic elements, the study object of the stylistics, the difference and the relation between the stylistics and the related subjects, the development direction of the stylistics, etc. The second, this paper excludes the political factors, from the more objective point of view, through the comprehensive analysis of the various aspects of linguistics, such as voice, vocabulary, grammar, etc., points out the differences and deficiencies of the study of the Korean and Korean stylistics, and points out to the study of the stylistics in the future The third, this paper co-ordinates the study of the stylistics of Korea and Korea, and studies the object and method of the study of the stylistics from the time of the study, which has a focus on the study of the style of the Korean language. In that first part of the first chapter, the study object, the purpose of the study and the previous study have been introduced. The second chapter discusses the concept and classification of the style. In order to clarify the subject of the study of stylistics, and to give full play to its utility, the present chapter has described the history of the study of the style of the Korean style and its utility in the chronological order. There are a number of definitions of the concept of the style, which is different from the perspective of the scholars and scholars. This paper firstly introduces the definition and the classification of the literary style in the academic circle since the present, and the classification of the rhetoric and the rhetoric. In the third chapter, the analysis of the sound and the consonants (phonemic analysis) and the prosodic effect (prosody analysis) of the sound and the consonants in the third chapter are discussed in the third chapter. In the field of linguistics, the voice is the same as the ideology The most distant aspect of the distance. The phonology is part of the sound of the sound. It contains a sound, a consonant, and a syllable. Even if it's close, it's due to its voice. The sign reflects a different style. The interpretation of the theory of speech is typical The fourth chapter, from the inherent word, the word of the Chinese character, the foreign word and the dialect, the hidden language, the common language, the synonym and the antonym of the same, to the Korean and North Korea The lexicology of the vocabulary is discussed in this paper. It is shaped with more vocabulary types, and the criteria for the classification of words will also follow the study. The fifth chapter is from the tense, to the grammar, the initiative and the passivity, the length of the article, the type of the article. On the other hand, the study of the stylistics of the Korean language is analyzed. The study of the linguistic style should be based on the analysis of the characteristics of the language and the interpretation of the literary batch. The style study, if it's just the form of a language, does not speak of a particular style, it's not a style study, it's just a lexical theory, grammar theory, the field of speech theory. The grammar theory does not relate to the style, In the second chapter, the main contents of this paper are summarized. In this paper, the limitation of this paper is pointed out. The study of stylistics in South Korea is more active, but the object and direction of the study of stylistics are different. Ununified Stylistic Theory, Terms, and Research Methods. In the study, the daily language should be the primary research object, but in the Republic of Korea, the style of the literary language The study of daily language is the original and essential, and the language of literature is conditional, special, and the study of stylistics should be combined with other linguistics. As in the field of research, from the start of a daily oral study, North Korea is hard to accept the changing linguistic theory because of its long-term locking policy, so the Korean style However, the value of the study of the stylistics of the DPRK is to In Korea, the daily language of the study is used as a research object. In the area of North Korea's research, the style of the style can be classified differently, but it is appropriate
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H052

【共引文献】