论南宋的“词科习气”及其批评

发布时间：2018-03-19 02:30

本文选题：词科习气　切入点：习气　出处：《文学遗产》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：随着南宋词科的兴盛,关于词科的批评也随之出现。南宋的词科批评中,较典型的有吴子良、刘克庄的"词科习气"说。从文学批评的层面看,"习气"一词,是将佛教语言引入文学批评的代表。词科有相对系统、完整的进阶内容,也较为重视家族与衣钵方面的承传,这些都促进了"词科习气"的形成。南宋词学之士中,被明确点出"习气"的有三人,分别是周必大、吕祖谦以及王应麟。他们的学术宗旨与文风并不相同,但在批评者看来,他们身上却都有着清晰的词学烙印。近似于"词科习气"的说法还有"词科程文手段""词科体"之说等等,它们构成了南宋中后期针对词科的系列批评。"词科习气"等批评,包含了对重视属辞比事之词学的轻视,不乏以偏概全等问题,但它们也为南宋的科举时文批评与四六文批评增添了新的内容,体现出南宋时期的文学批评越来越丰富与细化的趋势。
[Abstract]:With the prosperity of ci science in the Southern Song Dynasty, the criticism of ci science also appeared. In the ci science criticism of the Southern Song Dynasty, the typical ones were Wu Ziliang and Liu Kezhuang's "ci science habits". From the perspective of literary criticism, the word "habit" came into being. It is a representative of the introduction of Buddhist language into literary criticism. Ci has a relatively systematic and complete advanced content, and it also pays more attention to the inheritance of family and mantle. All these have promoted the formation of "ci science habits" in the Southern Song Dynasty. The three people who were clearly identified as "habits" were Zhou Bida, Lu Zuqian and Wang Yinglin. Their academic purpose was different from the style of writing, but in the view of their critics, But all of them have a clear brand of ci science. They also have similar views of "ci science habits" and "ci science Cheng Wen means" and "ci science style", and so on. They constitute a series of criticisms against ci science in the middle and late Southern Song Dynasty, such as "ci science habits," and so on. It includes the contempt of the ci science of attaching importance to the lexicology, and some problems, such as partial generalizations, etc., but they also add new contents to the criticism of the imperial examination of the Southern Song Dynasty and the criticism of the four or six articles. Reflects the Southern Song Dynasty literary criticism more and more rich and refined trend.
【作者单位】：《北京大学学报》编辑部;
【分类号】：I207.23

【相似文献】