当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 中国文学论文 >

邹思明《文选尤》研究

发布时间:2018-04-01 08:36

  本文选题:邹思明 切入点:《文选尤》 出处:《华侨大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:《文选》是我国历史上最早的诗文总集,诞生后蔚然形成文选学。明代评点之风盛行,加之科举考试的影响,出现了很多《文选》评点著作,可分为书商型评本、文人型评本和综合型评本。邹思明素来喜读《文选》,每每取出品读,并常以《文选》篇目教族中子弟。其书《文选尤》是文人型评本中的一种,该书对《文选》篇目进行删选后在眉端和文章末尾施加评点,或总评分脉,或细评探意,或释音义、解文辞、考古典。就删选而言,《文选尤》的作品涵盖《文选》所有文体。凡例言书中保留《文选》中意致委婉、词气渊含、才情奇宕及有裨于学者的作品。今对其删选面貌及评点细致分析发现,《文选尤》显示出邹思明对清丽和哀怨凄凉两种风格的青睐,同时在删选过程中有为义理服务的倾向。就评点而言,《文选尤》在诸多方面具有自己的特色:一是评点方式的多样化,采用评注融合的方式,眉批与篇末总评既各有分工又相互补充,并且能切实分析文章的脉络;二是评点中大量引用前人诗文,运用比喻的批评方法并借用书法的评点方式,使评语具有丰富的文学性;三是评点中有倾向地阐释作者的“忠义”“救世”思想和作品的“讽谏”“怨刺”思想,并积极渗入评点者的个人思想;四是运用体悟式的读书法细读《文选》,在知人论世的基础上体悟作者的内在情韵,从而实现评点视角下的情感融通。《文选尤》丰富了《文选》文人型评本的内容,显示了王阳明心学在《文选》评点领域的影响,突破和发展了比喻式的文学批评方式,为《文选》的文本细读作了一个示范。《文选尤》能引导读者对作品有综合而细致的理解,书中评语也以辑录的方式在其它评点著作中进行流传。
[Abstract]:Selected works is the earliest collection of poetry and prose in the history of China.The prevailing style of comment in Ming Dynasty, combined with the influence of imperial examination, has produced a lot of criticism works, which can be divided into bookseller type, literati type and comprehensive type.Zou Siming likes to read the selected works. He often takes out his articles and teaches his children.The selected works of his book is one of the literati criticism books. After deleting and selecting the selected articles, the book adds comments at the end of the eyebrow and at the end of the article, or evaluates the meaning, interprets the meaning, interprets the etymology, and tests the classical style at the end of the article.As far as the selection is concerned, the works of the selected works cover all the styles of the selected works.For example, the book retains the meaning of euphemism in selected works, the words of Qiyuan, talent, and good for the scholar's works.Through careful analysis of the selected features and comments, it is found that Zou Siming's preference for Qingli and sadness is shown, and that Zou Siming has a tendency to serve justice in the process of deletion.As far as comments are concerned, the selected works have their own characteristics in many aspects: first, the diversity of comment methods, the adoption of commentary fusion, the eyebrow criticism and the general comments at the end of the article have their own division of labor and complement each other, and they can actually analyze the context of the article;The second is to quote a large number of previous poems and essays in the comments, and to use the metaphorical criticism method and the calligraphy evaluation method to make the comments have rich literariness;Third, the author's thoughts of "loyalty" and "saving the world" and the thought of "ironic remonstrating" and "resentful thorn" in his works are interpreted in the comments, and the personal thoughts of the critics are actively infiltrated.The fourth is to use the reading method of understanding to read carefully the selected works of Literature, understand the author's inner feelings and rhyme on the basis of knowing the people and discuss the world, so as to realize the fusion of emotion from the perspective of comment. [selected works] enriches the contents of the literary criticism of the literati.It shows Wang Yangming's influence in the field of criticism of selected works, breaks through and develops the metaphorical way of literary criticism, and provides an example for the detailed reading of the text of the selected works, which can guide the readers to have a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the works.Comments in the book are also compiled in the form of other comments on the dissemination of works.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I206.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陆路;;江淹《望荆山》创作时地考[J];文史哲;2016年06期

2 郝P仔;;版式分工与注、评共生的博弈——谈明代《文选》删述本的版本特征[J];中国典籍与文化;2014年03期

3 许结;;明代的选学与赋论[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2013年03期

4 跃进;;《文选》中的四言诗(下)[J];古典文学知识;2011年05期

5 跃进;;《文选》中的四言诗(上)[J];古典文学知识;2011年04期

6 侯吉永;;古代殿试策问发论刍议[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期

7 赵俊玲;;邹思明《文选》评点著作——《文选尤》略论[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2007年05期

8 陈庆元;;悬剑空垅 有恨如何——读刘孝标《重答刘秣陵沼书》[J];古典文学知识;2004年05期

9 跃进;《文选》与“文选学”[J];中国典籍与文化;1996年03期

10 王英志;也释《文心雕龙》之“奇正”[J];陕西师大学报(哲学社会科学版);1982年01期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 杨疾超;古代书法批评模式研究[D];华中师范大学;2008年

2 张克锋;魏晋南北朝文论与书画论的会通[D];西北师范大学;2007年



本文编号:1694807

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/1694807.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8a18b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com