孙德谦“说理散不如骈”申论——兼论骈文的深层表达机制

发布时间：2018-07-06 07:44

本文选题：“说理散不如骈” + 骈体表达机制　；参考：《文学评论》2017年04期

【摘要】：孙德谦提出的"说理散不如骈"命题,涉及到骈散问题的核心。这一命题来自于三个基本前提:一是文章叙事、说理重心有别;二是文章体性不同效果各异;三是说理之"理"偏指"玄理"。孙氏命题存在事实基础:古代说理之著,大多以骈体写成;而叙事之作,则基本由散体撰就。骈文所以擅言中国思想中二元对立统一之"玄理",是因为排偶的形式特性及其规约的二元结构产生出一种深层表达机制——"并行背出、同时合观",它不仅长于表达二元对立统一之理,同时又和"求同存异"的逻辑方法暗合。另外,骈文的"用事"特性,又以其"扩展性"和"互文性"的高度融合进一步加强了说理能力。"说理散不如骈"命题,逻辑地彰显出"形式"在文体问题上的本原性。
[Abstract]:Sun Deqian put forward the proposition that "reasoning is better than parallel", which involves the core of the problem. This proposition comes from three basic premises: one is the narrative of the article, the center of reasoning is different; the other is the different effects of the article, and the third is that the "theory" of reasoning is partial to "metaphysics". Sun's proposition is based on facts: ancient works of reasoning are mostly written in parallel style, while narrative works are basically written in prose. The reason why parallel prose is adept at describing the "metaphysics" of the unity of opposites in Chinese thought is that the formal characteristics of opposites and the dualistic structure of the rules produce a deep mechanism of expression, that is, "parallel reciting." At the same time, it is not only good at expressing the dual unity of opposites, but also the logical method of seeking common ground while reserving differences. In addition, the characteristics of parallel prose "using things", with its "expansibility" and "intertextuality" of the high fusion further strengthened the reasoning ability. " The proposition of "parallel argument" is better than that of "disunity", which logically reveals the originality of "form" in stylistic issues.
【作者单位】：南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：I207.22

【参考文献】