农业观光园乡村景观评价及应用
本文选题:农业观光园 切入点:乡村景观 出处:《山东农业大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着人们对休闲生活的追求,回归自然成为人们内心的精神归宿。农业观光园顺应社会的需求而发展起来。本文选取了三所具有代表性的农业观光园作为研究案例,通过查阅农业观光园的相关资料、大众乡村景观意向调查、实地调查、专家问卷调查等方法选取并确定了评价因子,建立农业观光园乡村景观评价体系。进一步通过专家调查法确定农业观光园乡村景观评价指标权重,最后对调研地的游客进行乡村景观评价问卷调查,分析景观评价结果并提出优化建议。主要研究结果如下:1.通过选取评价指标,构建了农业观光园乡村景观评价体系本文采用取AHP层次分析法建立乡村景观评价指标体系,主要包括准则层2个因子、子准则层6个因子和指标层21个因子。首先确定乡村景观资源和社会效应为准则层评价因子,乡村景观资源中包含着子准则层中的自然景观、农业景观、人工景观、人文景观四项因子。自然景观以美景度、乡土性、丰富度、清洁度以及生态性五项因子作为指标评价层;农业景观研究主要通过观赏性、高效性、整体性和自然性四个因子作为评价指标展开;研究选取了功能性、协调性、合理性作为人工景观指标层评价因子;特色性、文化吸引力、艺术价值和参与性为人文景观指标层评价因子,同时选取生产现状和区位作为社会效应的子准则层评价因子,通过筛选和比较确定了季节性、知名度、园区效应作为生产现状指标层评价因子;地理位置和可达性作为区位指标层评价因子。2.采用层次分析法计算确定了农业观光园乡村景观评价指标权重根据层次分析法原理,运用专家问卷法和萨蒂(Satty)制定的1-9标度法构建判断矩阵,采用层次分析法计算指标权重,通过计算结果表明:(1)准则层中乡村景观资源的权重远大于社会效应权重;(2)子准则层中自然景观权重最大,其重要性高于农业景观、人文景观以及生产现状、人工景观和区位;(3)在指标层中,美景度权重最大,清洁度、生态性,乡土性、高效性和自然性指标同等重要。3.根据构建的评价体系,评价了莱芜雪野农业博览园、泰安花样年华和天泽农业科技园三个不同类型农业园区的乡村景观质量,并提出了发展建议。
[Abstract]:With the pursuit of leisure life, returning to nature has become the spiritual destination of people. The agricultural sightseeing garden has developed in accordance with the needs of the society. In this paper, three representative agricultural sightseeing parks are selected as research cases. The evaluation factors are selected and determined by consulting the relevant information of the agricultural sightseeing garden, the popular rural landscape intention investigation, the field investigation, the expert questionnaire and so on. The evaluation system of rural landscape of agricultural sightseeing garden is established. The weight of evaluation index of rural landscape of agricultural sightseeing garden is determined by the method of expert investigation. Finally, a questionnaire survey of rural landscape evaluation is conducted to the tourists in the investigation area. The main research results are as follows: 1. By selecting the evaluation index, the evaluation system of rural landscape of agricultural sightseeing garden is constructed. In this paper, the evaluation index system of rural landscape is established by using AHP analytic hierarchy process. It includes two factors in the criterion layer, six factors in the sub-criterion layer and 21 factors in the index layer. Firstly, the rural landscape resources and social effects are determined as the evaluation factors of the criterion layer, and the natural landscape in the sub-criterion layer is included in the rural landscape resources. Agricultural landscape, artificial landscape, humanistic landscape four factors. Natural landscape with beauty, rural soil, richness, cleanliness and ecology as the index evaluation layer; agricultural landscape research mainly through the ornamental, high efficiency, Overall and natural factors as evaluation indicators; the study selected functional, coordination, rationality as artificial landscape index layer evaluation factors; characteristics, cultural attraction, The artistic value and participation are the evaluation factors of the humanistic landscape index layer, and the production status and location are selected as the sub-criteria evaluation factors of the social effect. Through screening and comparing, the seasonality and popularity are determined. The park effect is regarded as the evaluation factor of the current production status index layer, the geographical location and accessibility as the location index layer evaluation factor. 2. The evaluation index weight of rural landscape in agricultural sightseeing garden is determined by AHP calculation according to the analytic hierarchy process principle. The judgment matrix is constructed by using the method of expert questionnaire and the 1-9 scale method developed by Satty), and the weight of index is calculated by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The results show that the weight of rural landscape resources is much higher than that of social effect in the criterion layer, and the importance of natural landscape is higher than that of agricultural landscape, humanistic landscape and production status. In the index layer, the beauty degree has the greatest weight, cleanliness, ecology, rural soil, high efficiency and natural index. 3. According to the evaluation system, the evaluation of the Laiwu Snow Field Agricultural Expo Park, The rural landscape quality of three different types of agricultural parks in Tai'an and Tianze Agricultural Science and Technology Park were discussed and some suggestions for their development were put forward.
【学位授予单位】:山东农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU986
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张奇志;;地域文化元素在乡村旅游景观表达中的运用[J];合作经济与科技;2015年07期
2 郑榕妍;;新型城镇化中休闲农业的定位与作用[J];农学学报;2014年01期
3 章兵;殷巧;汪天;;生态农业观光园景观评价体系研究[J];中国农学通报;2014年01期
4 张胜利;;国外休闲农业发展的典型模式分析及经验启示[J];农业与技术;2013年01期
5 张勇慧;李红旭;盛谦;李志勇;岳志平;;基于模糊综合评判的公路岩质边坡稳定性分级研究[J];岩土力学;2010年10期
6 张发民;;郑州市休闲农业发展模式及选择思路[J];科技创业月刊;2009年07期
7 欧亚丽;;中国乡村农业观光园景观规划初探[J];硅谷;2008年20期
8 张晴;罗其友;刘李峰;;国外农业休闲功能及对中国农业的启示[J];世界农业;2008年10期
9 李P;徐析;;论乡土景观设计的内涵与外延[J];山东林业科技;2008年04期
10 王艳;张捷;史春云;冉江;;基于公众媒介信息的水乡古镇景观意象研究[J];北京第二外国语学院学报;2007年09期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 于兰岭;农业观光园景观资源评价与景观营造研究[D];山东农业大学;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭雨楠;浙江省农业观光园景观建设及评价研究[D];浙江农林大学;2014年
2 张英云;基于游客感知的乡村景观休闲价值研究[D];北京林业大学;2013年
3 张萍香;福建省休闲农业发展研究[D];福建师范大学;2010年
4 蔡敏琦;模糊综合评判在清洁生产评价中的应用研究[D];兰州大学;2008年
5 安云娜;福州市景观健康与景观美学质量研究[D];福建师范大学;2008年
6 肖国增;重庆城市公园绿地植物景观评价研究[D];西南大学;2007年
7 倪静雪;解读乡村景观的意象[D];上海交通大学;2007年
8 叶亚丽;山区高速公路景观设计与评价[D];长安大学;2006年
9 彭钟;观光农业园景观审美特色研究[D];武汉理工大学;2006年
10 付毅;高等级公路景观评价方法研究[D];吉林大学;2005年
,本文编号:1556992
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/1556992.html