城市历史景观方法下的青岛殖民时期工业遗产保护更新
发布时间：2018-07-18 15:30
【摘要】：自20世纪50年代“工业考古”行动在英国开展以来,对有价值工业历史遗迹的保护逐步由欧洲扩展到全世界范围内,进入21世纪后,工业遗产保护更新已成为一个全球性的共识。我国的工业遗产保护更新工作起步于20世纪80年代,经过近30年的发展,在多个方面取得了令人瞩目的成就,但是从整体上看,我国工业遗产保护更新工作仍然处于初级阶段,在保护力度、研究力度和实践成果上与欧美发达国家之间的差距依旧十分明显。具体到青岛来说,作为一个有长时间殖民历史的工业城市,殖民时期工业遗产占青岛近代工业遗产总量的绝大部分。作为物化的工业文明,这些殖民时期工业具有重要的保留价值和历史意义,是反映青岛近代城市建设和工业发展的重要历史遗迹。然而现阶段青岛普遍存在的散点式、自发性工业遗产保护更新存在明显缺陷,既不能有效保护工业遗产的历史风貌和历史文脉,也无法与城市的产业结构调整形成契合。长期使用此类不适当的保护更新方法,不仅会损害殖民时期工业遗产的自身价值,也会进一步降低其在城市发展中的作用和地位。在这种情况下,城市历史景观方法及其所提倡的城市历史遗迹保护与城市发展动态平衡理论,为解决当前青岛殖民时期工业遗产保护更新中存在的主要问题提供了新的解决思路。本文以青岛殖民时期工业遗产作为主要研究对象,首先通过对青岛殖民时期城市历史景观和殖民时期工业遗产现状的实地调查,从中发现当前青岛殖民时期工业遗产保护更新中存在的主要问题。接着从解决这些问题的角度出发,对城市历史景观方法在青岛殖民时期工业遗产保护更新中应用的可行性、基本原则进行论述,并提出相应的基本策略和一些可行的更新模式。最后结合对城市历史景观方法应用的成功实例——青岛啤酒博物馆的分析,指出采用城市历史景观方法是解决青岛殖民时期工业遗产保护更新与城市长期、持续发展之间矛盾的切实有效的手段。
[Abstract]:Since the "Industrial Archaeology" operation was launched in Britain in the 1950s, the protection of valuable industrial historical sites has gradually expanded from Europe to the whole world, and has entered the 21st century. The protection and renewal of industrial heritage has become a global consensus. China's industrial heritage protection and renewal work started in the 1980s. After nearly 30 years of development, it has made remarkable achievements in many aspects, but on the whole, the industrial heritage protection and renewal work in our country is still in the primary stage. In terms of protection, research and practical results, the gap between European and American developed countries is still very obvious. To Qingdao, as an industrial city with a long colonial history, the industrial heritage of the colonial period accounts for the vast majority of the total industrial heritage of Qingdao in modern times. As a materialized industrial civilization, these colonial industries have important preservation value and historical significance, and they are important historical relics reflecting the modern urban construction and industrial development of Qingdao. However, there are obvious defects in the spontaneous industrial heritage protection and renewal in Qingdao, which can neither effectively protect the historical features and historical context of industrial heritage, nor can it fit with the adjustment of the industrial structure of the city. The long-term use of such inappropriate conservation and renewal methods will not only damage the value of industrial heritage during the colonial period, but also further reduce its role and status in urban development. In this case, the method of urban historical landscape and the theory of dynamic balance between the protection of urban historical sites and urban development are advocated. It provides a new way to solve the main problems existing in the protection and renewal of industrial heritage during the colonial period in Qingdao. In this paper, Qingdao colonial industrial heritage as the main research object, first of all, through the colonial period of Qingdao city historical landscape and colonial period industrial heritage status of the field investigation, The main problems existing in the protection and renewal of industrial heritage during the colonial period in Qingdao were found. Then from the point of view of solving these problems, this paper discusses the feasibility and basic principles of the application of the urban historical landscape method in the protection and renewal of industrial heritage during the colonial period of Qingdao, and puts forward the corresponding basic strategies and some feasible renewal modes. Finally, based on the analysis of Tsing Tao Beer Museum, a successful example of the application of the urban historical landscape method, it is pointed out that the urban historical landscape method is a solution to the preservation and renewal of the industrial heritage and the long-term urban development during the colonial period in Qingdao. A practical and effective means of conflict between sustainable development.
【学位授予单位】：青岛理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU984.114
本文编号：2132344
[Abstract]:Since the "Industrial Archaeology" operation was launched in Britain in the 1950s, the protection of valuable industrial historical sites has gradually expanded from Europe to the whole world, and has entered the 21st century. The protection and renewal of industrial heritage has become a global consensus. China's industrial heritage protection and renewal work started in the 1980s. After nearly 30 years of development, it has made remarkable achievements in many aspects, but on the whole, the industrial heritage protection and renewal work in our country is still in the primary stage. In terms of protection, research and practical results, the gap between European and American developed countries is still very obvious. To Qingdao, as an industrial city with a long colonial history, the industrial heritage of the colonial period accounts for the vast majority of the total industrial heritage of Qingdao in modern times. As a materialized industrial civilization, these colonial industries have important preservation value and historical significance, and they are important historical relics reflecting the modern urban construction and industrial development of Qingdao. However, there are obvious defects in the spontaneous industrial heritage protection and renewal in Qingdao, which can neither effectively protect the historical features and historical context of industrial heritage, nor can it fit with the adjustment of the industrial structure of the city. The long-term use of such inappropriate conservation and renewal methods will not only damage the value of industrial heritage during the colonial period, but also further reduce its role and status in urban development. In this case, the method of urban historical landscape and the theory of dynamic balance between the protection of urban historical sites and urban development are advocated. It provides a new way to solve the main problems existing in the protection and renewal of industrial heritage during the colonial period in Qingdao. In this paper, Qingdao colonial industrial heritage as the main research object, first of all, through the colonial period of Qingdao city historical landscape and colonial period industrial heritage status of the field investigation, The main problems existing in the protection and renewal of industrial heritage during the colonial period in Qingdao were found. Then from the point of view of solving these problems, this paper discusses the feasibility and basic principles of the application of the urban historical landscape method in the protection and renewal of industrial heritage during the colonial period of Qingdao, and puts forward the corresponding basic strategies and some feasible renewal modes. Finally, based on the analysis of Tsing Tao Beer Museum, a successful example of the application of the urban historical landscape method, it is pointed out that the urban historical landscape method is a solution to the preservation and renewal of the industrial heritage and the long-term urban development during the colonial period in Qingdao. A practical and effective means of conflict between sustainable development.
【学位授予单位】：青岛理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU984.114
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 钱毅;任璞;张子涵;;德占时期青岛工业遗产与青岛城市历史景观[J];工业建筑;2014年09期
2 刘爱丽;;天津工业遗产现状研究[J];社科纵横(新理论版);2013年01期
3 于一凡;;上海工业遗产保护与再利用发展现状及面临问题[J];城市建筑;2013年05期
4 王润生;朱宁;高琦;;论青岛工业遗产保护及再利用之路[J];工业建筑;2013年01期
5 季宏;徐苏斌;闫觅军;;从天津碱厂保护到工业遗产价值认知[J];建筑创作;2012年12期
6 蒋宇;;保留城市的记忆——对当代中国城市历史景观保护的美学思考[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年11期
7 俞孔坚;;中山岐江公园景观规划设计[J];城市环境设计;2010年10期
8 陈雨蕉;;我国工业遗产保护再利用案例比较浅析[J];中国文物科学研究;2010年03期
9 尹文娟;;我国工业遗产保护与研究的现状及问题分析[J];中国西部科技;2010年24期
10 冯立f;;关于工业遗产研究与保护的若干问题[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
，本文编号：2132344
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/2132344.html
