“全球美学”与中国美学——中国美学如何与世界接轨

发布时间：2018-06-01 08:02

本文选题：中国美学 + 全球美学　；参考：《学术月刊》2011年08期

【摘要】：张法认为,中国美学史研究有三种模式——教材型、范畴型、跨学科型,有两个方向——由王国维以来的重从古代材料本身的性质而进行总结,由朱光潜以来的把西方美学原理的延伸到中国古代;因而,如何把多元一体中的多元包括进来,如何思考古代概念的虚实合一性质对理论表述的影响,是它在演进中一直被忽视的问题。朱良志认为,道禅哲学关于美是不可分析的观念,反映了中国美学重体验、重生命超越的鲜明特色,体现出中国美学在长期发展过程中与西方美学的不同旨趣,也从一个侧面展现出中国人在很早的时候就对美的核心问题有深邃的思考。陈望衡认为,在全球化的今天实际上只有一种美学,那就是全球美学;就当代中国美学的建设来说,需要建立的不是独立的与世界隔绝的中国美学,而是具有中国特色的全球美学;如果不是只看重美学学科框架比较,而是更看重美学学科精神的相通,中国古典美学与世界美学的接轨则会容易得多。
[Abstract]:Zhang Fa believes that there are three patterns in the study of Chinese aesthetic history - textbook, category, interdisciplinary, and two directions - from Wang Guowei's emphasis on the nature of the ancient material itself, and from Zhu Guangqian to the ancient principles of western aesthetics to ancient China; thus, how to include pluralism in the pluralistic integration. How to think about the influence of the nature of the virtual reality of the ancient concept on the theoretical expression is a problem that has been neglected in the evolution of the ancient concept. Zhu Liangzhi believes that the philosophy of Taoism is an unanalytical idea about beauty, which reflects the distinctive features of Chinese aesthetics, which emphasizes the transcendence of life, and embodies the Chinese aesthetics in the long course of development and Western aesthetics. The different purport also shows that the Chinese people have deep thinking about the core issues of the United States at a very early time. Chen Wangheng believes that there is only one aesthetic in the globalization today, that is, the global aesthetics; for the construction of contemporary Chinese aesthetics, it is not an independent Chinese aesthetics that is isolated from the world, It is a global aesthetics with Chinese characteristics. If it is not only to pay more attention to the comparison of the framework of aesthetics, but rather to the connection of the spirit of the aesthetic subject, the integration of Chinese classical aesthetics with the world aesthetics will be much easier.
【作者单位】：武汉大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B83-09

【共引文献】