二十世纪初叶文论中的文学名词审定问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-15 04:00

本文选题：二十世纪初叶 + 文论　；参考：《河南大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 名词审定是文学理论走向科学化(概念化、术语化、命题化)的基本途径,是古典文论形态向现代文论形态转化的契机。文学名词的审定,是文学理论在言语机制上实现从描述性向规范性转变的基本途径。本文主要通过探讨20世纪20年代文学名词审定问题产生的背景、原因及其逐步规范化和初步形成这样一种过程,来论证文学名词审定在现代文论过渡中的重要作用。第一章,首先对名词审定问题的产生进行了史料梳理,通过译书机构对译名问题的讨论、学界个人和民间团体对译名问题的关注、政府及教育机构对译名统一的重视,考察了从科技名词审定到文学名词审定这样一个大的背景情况。第二章,以《小说月报》对文学名词的审定为例,考察了文学名词审定意识的产生。新文学运动与新文学期刊——《小说月报》的应运而生、读者对文学名词统一的渴望、其他学科名词审定工作的影响,这些都是文学名词审定意识产生的直接因素。从郑振铎1921年第一次正式提出文学名词审定问题,到1923年对文学名词审定问题的大讨论,文学译名统一工作一直受到很多人的关注。报刊上的公开呼吁、提倡已经为文学名词审定问题的深入和普及提供了一种契机,而由于《小说月报》在现代文学理论知识的介绍、引进、翻译、传播中的重要地位,文学名词审定的意识更加深入人心。第三章,壬戌学制与文学名词的制度化,如果说学者们在杂志报刊中的讨论、提倡引起了大家对文学名词审定问题的普遍重视的话,那么,1923年壬戌学制中对新文学及文学概论课程的重视就为文学名词审定的进一步深入探讨提供了一种外在权力保证。新学制对新文学的重视和对文学概论课程的规定,使得文学话语言说和文学名词审定有了讨论和传授的场所,而文学名词的审定借助于壬戌学制又在制度上得到了保证,从而产生了一大批文学概论教材,传播了规范的文学理论话语,并最终在20年代后期产生了系统而全面的文学词典。第四章,文学理论教材的编写与文学词典的编纂则为统一的文学名词进入课堂和步入社会提供了契机。名词统一包括的两个方面——名称统一和内涵统一——也在此时初步形成。可以说文学理论教材的编写为文学名词统一进一步提供了条件,而文学词典的编纂则标志着文学名词审定的初步形成。现代文论的产生和发展多比附科学化的标准,这样一种过程中,文学名词审定是其最基础和最基本的工作。考察整个20年代的文学名词审定工作,可以发现,现代文学理论正是沿着这样的一个科学化、规范化的道路前进。有了20世纪20年代末期文学名词审定工作的初步完成,才有了中国现代文学理论形态形成。
[Abstract]:Noun examination is a basic way for literary theory to be scientific (conceptualization, terminology, propositional), and an opportunity for the transformation from classical literary theory to modern literary theory. The validation of literary nouns is the basic way for literary theory to change from descriptive to normative in speech mechanism. This paper mainly discusses the background, causes, standardization and preliminary formation of literary noun validation in the 1920s to demonstrate the important role of literary noun validation in the transition of modern literary theory. In the first chapter, the author firstly combs the historical data on the issue of the examination and approval of nouns. Through the discussion of the translation of the names by the translation organizations, the academic circles and non-governmental organizations pay attention to the translation of names, and the government and educational institutions attach importance to the unification of the translation of names. This paper examines the background from scientific noun validation to literary noun validation. In the second chapter, taking the examination and approval of literary nouns in the monthly Fiction News as an example, the author examines the emergence of literary noun validation consciousness. The emergence of the New Literature Movement and the New Literary Journal-Fiction monthly, the readers' desire for the unity of literary nouns, and the influence of other disciplines on the examination and approval of nouns are all the direct factors that lead to the consciousness of literary noun validation. From the first time that Zheng Zhenduo formally raised the question of literary noun examination in 1921 to the great discussion on the issue of literary noun validation in 1923, many people have been paying close attention to the unification of literary translation and nomenclature. The public appeal in the press has provided an opportunity for the deepening and popularizing of literary terms, but because of the important position of the monthly Fiction in the introduction, translation and dissemination of modern literary theories, The consciousness of literary noun validation is more popular. In the third chapter, the system of education and the institutionalization of literary nouns. If the discussion of scholars in magazines and newspapers has aroused the general attention to the problem of literary noun examination and approval, Therefore, the attention paid to the course of New Literature and its introduction in 1923 provides an external power guarantee for the further study of literary terms. The importance attached by the new school system to the new literature and the stipulation of the course of literary introduction made the literary discourse and literary noun examination and approval have a place to discuss and impart, and the examination and approval of literary nouns was guaranteed by the system. As a result, a large number of literature teaching materials were produced, which spread the normative discourse of literary theory, and finally produced a systematic and comprehensive literary dictionary in the late 1920s. The fourth chapter, the compilation of literature theory textbooks and literary dictionaries provides an opportunity for the unified literary nouns to enter the classroom and enter the society. The unity of noun includes two aspects-the unity of name and the unity of connotation-also formed at this time. It can be said that the compilation of literary theory textbooks provides further conditions for the unification of literary nouns, while the compilation of literary dictionaries marks the initial formation of literary nouns examination and approval. The emergence and development of modern literary theory are based on scientific standards. In such a process, the validation of literary nouns is the most basic and basic work. Through the examination of literary nouns in the 1920s, it can be found that modern literary theory is advancing along such a scientific and standardized road. With the initial completion of literary noun validation in the late 1920s, the formation of Chinese modern literary theory was formed.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I0

【相似文献】