贡布里希艺术史研究方法研究

发布时间：2018-07-01 12:40

本文选题：贡布里希 + 艺术史　；参考：《陕西科技大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：恩斯特·贡布里希爵士[Sir Ernst Gombrich]是20世纪最具影响力的艺术史学家之一,被称为苏格拉底式的学者,在艺术研究领域首次使用了知觉心理学的方法,并传授给了最普通读者以欣赏艺术品的能力。他视野宏阔、学识渊博,几乎研究了现代艺术史学领域的全部。论文引言部分主要介绍了对贡布里希艺术史理论的国内外研究现状。国内主要研究介绍了贡布里希的部分著作和艺术史观,以及它们在视知觉艺术领域的应用,对贡布里希的思想精华进行了积极传播和高度肯定,同时又对其艺术史家的身份提出了质疑。总体上是以褒扬为主。国外的研究是一方面肯定他的重要的学术影响力和崇高的学术地位,另一方面又对其著作中的一些观点的局限性予以揭示和批评。根据已有研究,本文提出了自己的研究问题：贡布里希的艺术史研究理论与方法对我国的艺术史研究、艺术教育与实践价值何在?研究方法是否最终服务于艺术史研究?第二部分关注的是贡布里希学术思想的形成过程。主要介绍了他的学术经历,他的艺术史研究方法的形成影响因素、创新性、传承性,以及对其重要著作形成的影响作用。第三、四、五部分是文章的主体部分,主要通过贡布里希的四部著作,讨论其社会学、心理学、图像学等艺术史研究的方法和理论体系,还结合部分其他著作简要介绍了他的信息学、符号学、哲学等研究方法。他的“预成图式—修正”、“投射”、“情境逻辑”和“观者介入”等观点对解释艺术史的形成和图像意义的理性阐释极具创新性和科学性。贡布里希的另一巨大贡献是将所有这些方法在自己的艺术史探讨中灵活组合,共同解释了艺术史上的种种问题和现象。第六部分主要探讨了贡布里希艺术史研究方法在中国的传播价值以及借鉴意义。首先,在西方艺术史观的发展沿革中,贡布里希地位显著,对前人的思想有传承、有创新,以其在著作中的智慧展现而堪称20世纪最杰出的艺术史家。同时,他的研究方法极具科学性和严谨性,他的著作充满人文关怀,反映出他对文化遗产的标准和价值的经久不息的深切关注。所有这些无论是对我们的艺术教育、治学精神、还是艺术理论写作都具有一定的指导意义和借鉴价值。第七部分总结了本文的创新点和研究成果。创新点在于从纵横两个方向研究了贡布里希研究方法的形成和具体应用,梳理了其理论的历史沿革和相互影响,分析了其优越性和局限性,说明了这些方法对丰富我们自己的艺术史教育与研究在方法论上的传播价值。他的艺术史研究打破了各学科之间的界限,引发了西方新艺术史的发展,但受可见材料所限对非西方艺术史提及甚少,而且对现代艺术和后现代艺术有排斥之嫌。本文对贡布里希的哲学史观探讨不足。
[Abstract]:Sir Ernst Gombrich, one of the most influential art historians of the 20th century, known as the Socrates, used the method of perceptual psychology for the first time in the field of art studies. And taught the most ordinary readers to appreciate the art ability. He has a broad field of vision and knowledge, and has studied almost all the fields of modern art historiography. The introduction of the paper mainly introduces the research status of Gonbridge's art history theory at home and abroad. The main domestic studies have introduced parts of Gonbridge's works and views of art history, as well as their application in the field of visual perception art, and have carried out positive dissemination and high affirmation of the essence of Gonbridge's thoughts. At the same time, he questioned the identity of his art historian. Generally speaking, praise is the main. On the one hand, foreign studies affirm his important academic influence and lofty academic status, on the other hand, he reveals and criticizes the limitations of some viewpoints in his works. According to the existing research, this paper puts forward its own research questions: what is the value of Gonbridge's theory and method of art history research to our country's art history research, art education and practice? Does the research method ultimately serve the study of art history? The second part focuses on the forming process of Gonbridge's academic thought. This paper mainly introduces his academic experience, the factors influencing the formation, innovation, inheritance, and the influence on the formation of his important works. The third, fourth and fifth parts are the main body of the article, mainly through four works by Gombrich, to discuss the methods and theoretical system of his research on the history of art, such as sociology, psychology, graphics, etc. It also briefly introduces his research methods of informatics, semiotics, philosophy and so on. His viewpoints such as "pre-formed schema-correction", "projection", "situational logic" and "viewer intervention" are innovative and scientific in explaining the formation of art history and the rational interpretation of image meaning. Another great contribution of Gombrich is the flexible combination of all these methods in his own exploration of the history of art to explain the problems and phenomena in the history of art. The sixth part mainly discusses the spreading value and reference significance of Gonbridge's art history research method in China. First of all, in the development and evolution of the western view of art history, Gombrich is the most outstanding art historian in the 20th century because he has inherited and innovated the thought of his predecessors. At the same time, his research method is extremely scientific and rigorous. His works are full of humanistic concern and reflect his deep concern for the standard and value of cultural heritage. All these have certain guiding significance and reference value to our art education, study spirit and art theory writing. The seventh part summarizes the innovation and research results of this paper. The innovation lies in studying the formation and concrete application of Gonbridge's research method from the vertical and horizontal directions, combing the historical evolution and mutual influence of its theory, and analyzing its superiority and limitation. The results show that these methods can enrich our art history education and research in methodology. His study of art history broke the boundaries between various disciplines and triggered the development of new art history in the West. However, limited by visible materials, he rarely mentioned the history of non-western art and rejected modern art and post-modern art. In this paper, the philosophy of Gombrich's view of history is not enough to explore.
【学位授予单位】：陕西科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：J110.9

【相似文献】