“文学性”概念的中国之旅

发布时间：2018-07-03 04:17

本文选题：“文学性” + 中西比较　；参考：《河北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：自二十世纪二十年代俄国形式主义流派提出“文学性”概念后,便成为西方文学理论研究的重点问题之一。“文学性”概念经埃利希等人译介到英美,进入西方学者视野,八十年代辗转进入中国,开启了在中国的“旅行”。但是,在西方“文学性”概念尚未译介之前,在汉语中已有“文学性”概念的使用,但仅仅是作为一个词语在使用并没有上升到概念范畴。二十世纪八十年代以后,西方“文学性”概念和我国本土“文学性”术语相碰撞,逐渐成为学界关注的一个核心概念,特别是在后现代的视域下文学边界之争问题的出现,使得“文学性”成为一个聚讼纷纭的问题域。本文以“文学性”为关键词,对中西不同文化语境中的“文学性”概念做谱系学的梳理,着重分析“文学性”概念在中国语境中的发展建构过程,以及二者之间的差异。论文共分为三章,第一章就“文学性”概念在西方的产生和发展过程进行梳理,从二十世纪初在俄国形式主义范畴内的产生到后现代时期的再次提出,历经英美新批评,结构主义,解构主义等理论流派,使“文学性”概念的内涵不断丰富,产生两种不同的“文学性”。第二章对中国本土“文学性”概念进行谱系学梳理,分析该概念是如何从一个普通词语发展成为文学理论术语。以八十年代为分割点,分别探究作为词语的“文学性”与西方影响下的“文学性”概念的具体所指和内涵,并阐释了国内学者关于“文学性”概念的借用、“文学性”蔓延等诸多学术论争。第三章在前两章的基础上展开论述,对中西不同语境中的“文学性”概念进行比较,分析中国本土的“文学性”概念在发展过程中呈现的特点,以及西方“文学性”概念在中国具体文学语境中传承与变迁的基本路径,分析探讨中国本土的“文学性”概念迥异于西方作为知识的“文学性”概念,二者之间并不能形成平等的对话。
[Abstract]:Since the Russian formalism school put forward the concept of "literariness" in the 1920s, it has become one of the key issues in the study of western literary theory. The concept of "literariness" was translated and introduced to the United States and the United States by Ehrlich and other people, and entered the field of vision of western scholars. In the 1980s, the concept of "literariness" was introduced into China, which opened up "travel" in China. However, before the translation of the concept of "literariness" in the West, the concept of "literariness" has been used in Chinese, but only as a word has not risen to the category of concept. Since the 1980s, the concept of "literariness" in the West has collided with the term "literariness" in China, which has gradually become a core concept concerned by academic circles, especially the emergence of the dispute over literary boundaries from the perspective of the post-modern era. It makes literariness become a controversial problem domain. Taking "literariness" as the key word, this paper makes a genealogical analysis of the concept of "literariness" in different cultural contexts of China and western countries, and analyzes emphatically the process of development and construction of the concept of "literariness" in Chinese context and the difference between them. The thesis is divided into three chapters. The first chapter combs the emergence and development of the concept of "literariness" in the West, from the emergence of the concept of "literariness" in the Russian formalism category at the beginning of the 20th century to the new criticism of the United States and the United States in the post-modern period. Structuralism, deconstruction and other theoretical schools enrich the connotation of the concept of "literariness" and produce two different "literariness". The second chapter makes a genealogical analysis of the concept of "literariness" in China, and analyzes how the concept has developed from a common word to a term of literary theory. Taking the 1980s as the dividing point, this paper probes into the specific implications and connotations of the concept of "literariness" as a word and the concept of "literariness" under the influence of the West, and explains the borrowing of the concept of "literariness" by domestic scholars. The spread of "literariness" and many other academic debates. The third chapter discusses on the basis of the first two chapters, compares the concept of "literariness" in different contexts between China and the West, and analyzes the characteristics of the concept of "literariness" in the process of development. And the basic path of inheritance and change of the western concept of "literariness" in the context of Chinese specific literature, this paper analyzes and discusses that the concept of "literariness" in China is very different from the concept of "literariness" as knowledge in the West. There is no equal dialogue between the two.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I0

【相似文献】