《智游佛国漫记》与《走过西藏》的比较研究

发布时间：2018-07-12 13:10

本文选题：比较 + 旅游文学　；参考：《西藏大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《智游佛国漫记》这部著作是二十世纪西藏启蒙思想家及学者——根敦群培大师在智游佛国境地时，根据自己的所见所闻所思，描写和叙述异地独特的自然风光及民风民俗，着重论述和考证印藏文化方面疑难问题的一部文化性较强的旅游文学作品。而《走过西藏》是中国当代“大散文”代表作家——马丽华二十多年在西藏的工作生活期间，走遍西藏的大江南北，深入了解西藏文化生活过程中所创作的一部旅游文学作品。这两部作品在创作中，因艺术与科学完美地结合在了一起，且享有丰富的文化底蕴而远远超出了文学价值，可称是藏汉文学史上的一大创新。所以无论从文学的角度还是从科学的角度，这两部作品都具有较高的比较研究价值。其次这两部作品中，两位作者对西藏的宗教文化与历史文化，语言文字民风民俗自然环境等多方面进行了深入的研究和反思，因此正在全球掀起的藏学热潮中，这两部作品更具有较高的比较研究意义。自开创根敦群培的研究以来，国内外学者专家对他的生平和思想，学术等方面的研究已取得了一定的成绩。然而对于大师本人所珍爱的《智游佛国漫记》这部著作，至今却未有人去作深入的研究。更值得痛惜的是，在藏族文学史中这部著作竟是唯一一个可以与世界旅游文学作品相提并论的代表作品。在西藏文学研究中对这一类文学的研究至今也处于空白状态。对于此篇论文中与之作比较的《走过西藏》这部作品来说，国内外许多专家学者对其也给予了很高的评价。但作品中作为主要人物的我们，即没有对作者所描述的自身形象进行过表态，也未有对作者提出的见解和提议做过审思。所以，一是为了弥补根敦群培研究的薄弱环节。二是为了填补西藏旅游文学研究的空白。三是为了让藏人对别民族作家所著的关于西藏的文学作品引起观注。本人的硕士毕业论文选择了《智游佛国漫记》与《走过西藏》比较研究这一课题。本人为了顺利撰写这篇论文，首先在大力收集有关参考资料的同时，不断进行亲身体验和实地考察来增加自己的感性认识，抓住疑难问题积极向指导教师请教等做了充分的前期准备工作。在撰写过程中始终以历史唯物主义和辨证唯物主义为指导思想，进行实事求是的分析和研究。以文学理论特别是比较文学理论作后盾，运用了文类学平行比较研究为主的诸多研究方法和不同的研究角度，对这两部作品的文体和作者所体现的思想性质，以及作品的特征和价值等方面，进行了比较研究。全篇论文共以三个大章组成。第一章中：主要通过旅游文体的类型比较研究来突出这两部作品的可比性，借用汉民族在旅游文学上的研究经验和理论知识，从旅游文学的概念和分类等角度去比较分析这两部作品的异同，同时以《智游佛国漫记》为例，浅析了西藏旅游文学的过去与现状，为今后开发这类文体的研究铺垫了基础。第二章中：一是为了给当今文学界的腐败现象起到表率的作用，笔者对根敦群培和马丽华不谓艰险苦难，，不为功名利禄的创作动机和专研精神进行了评述。二是因为这两部作品所涉及到的内容较多，无法像小说那样概括和总结整篇文章的中心思想。所以笔者为了更好地挖解作品的主要内容和研究价值，比较分析了在异文化的碰撞中作者所体现的思想规律，探讨了两位作者对整个人类社会，尤其对印藏文化生活上所倾注的人文主义的关怀和反思，供人们加以思索。第三章中：首先比较分析了两部作品在描写自然景观与人文景观等方面相同的艺术特征和创作方法上文学与其它学科相结合的突破性特征。然后从作家的身份及出发点的不同，分析论证了《智游佛国漫记》的文化论述性特征和《走过西藏》的抒情艺术性特征的不同。最后根据以上的比较分析，进一步探讨了这两部作品在藏学以及人类文化和现实社会生活中的贡献价值。然而本人虽凭借着对藏族文学的一份热忠鼓起勇气，竭尽全力来完成这篇论文的撰写。但因笔者的见识短浅和经验不足，该论文中会有很多片面的观点和认识上的误区，在此恳请各位名师在评阅这篇论文时，给予更多的指点和建议。
[Abstract]:The book of Buddhism in the state of Buddhism is a famous thinker and scholar in Tibet in twentieth Century - Master gun gun guru, when he was in the territory of the Buddha, described and narrated the unique natural scenery and folk custom in different places according to what he had seen and heard, and focused on a strong cultural tour of the difficult problems in the literature and collection. Travel literature works. And < past Tibet > is the representative writer of Chinese contemporary "great prose" - during his more than 20 years' work and life in Tibet, Ma Lihua traveled north and south of Tibet to understand a tourist literature created in the process of cultural life in Tibet. The two works are in perfect combination of art and science. Together, and enjoy a rich cultural background and far beyond the value of literature, it is called a great innovation in the history of Tibetan and Chinese literature. Therefore, both from the angle of literature and from the angle of science, the two works have high comparative value. In the next two works, the two writers have the religious and historical texts of Tibet. The two works have a higher comparative research significance in the global upsurge of Tibetan studies, which are being studied and reconsidered in many aspects, such as language, language, folk custom, natural environment and so on.
Since the study of Gen gun group culture, scholars at home and abroad have made certain achievements in his life, thought and academic research. However, no one has made a thorough study of the book, which is precious to the master himself, the book of Buddhism in the state of Buddhism, which is more worthy of regret, in the history of Tibetan literature. It is the only representative work which can be compared with the works of the world tourism literature. In the study of Tibet literature, the study of this kind of literature is still in a blank state. In this paper, a lot of experts and scholars at home and abroad have also given a very high evaluation to the work compared to "Tibet >". As the main character, we do not make a statement of the author's own image, nor do the author's views and proposals have been tried. So, one is to make up for the weak link of the study of Tibet's group culture. The purpose is to fill the gap in the study of Tibet's tourism literature. Three is to make Tibetans to other ethnic writers. His work on literature in Tibet has attracted attention. My master's thesis has chosen the topic of comparative study of the book of wisdom and the comparison between Tibet and Guo.
In order to write this paper successfully, first of all, at the same time, in the process of collecting the relevant reference materials, I continue to carry out personal experience and field investigation to increase my perceptual knowledge, seize the difficult problems and make full preparations for instructing teachers and so on. In the writing process, historical materialism and dialectical materialism are always in the process of writing. It is the analysis and study of seeking truth from facts, with the theory of literature, especially the comparative literature theory as the backing, and the many research methods and different angles of research, which are based on the parallel comparative study of the genre, and the characteristics and values of the two works, as well as the characteristics and values of the works. A comparative study was carried out. The whole paper consists of three chapters.
In the first chapter, the comparability of the two works is highlighted mainly through the comparative study of the types of tourism styles. The similarities and differences of the two works are compared and analyzed from the perspective of the concept and classification of tourism literature by borrowing the research experience and theoretical knowledge of the Han nationality in tourism literature. At the same time, a brief analysis of the Tibet brigade is made with the example of the "Zhi You Buddhism" The past and present situation of tourism literature lay a foundation for the future development of this style.
The second chapter: first, in order to play an exemplary role in the corruption of today's literary world, the author commented on the creation motive and specialization of Ma Lihua, which does not mean hardship and hardship, and not for fame and wealth. Two is that the two works involve more content and cannot generalize and summarize the whole text like novels. In order to better dig out the main content and research value of the works, the author compares and analyzes the ideological law embodied in the different cultural collisions, and probes into the concern and reflection of the two authors to the whole human society, especially the humanism in the cultural life of the Tibet, for people to think about.
In the third chapter, the author first compares and analyzes the breakthroughs in the combination of the artistic features and the creative methods of the two works in the description of the natural landscape and the humanistic landscape. In the end, according to the comparison and analysis above, the contribution value of the two works to Tibetan studies and human culture and real social life is further discussed.
However, I do my best to complete this paper with the courage of the Tibetan literature, but because of my short experience and lack of experience, there will be a lot of one-sided views and misunderstanding in this paper.
【学位授予单位】：西藏大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：I0-03;I106

【参考文献】