艺术终结问题及其中国式表征
发布时间：2018-11-29 07:47
【摘要】： 自黑格尔在柏林的美学讲演中提出艺术终结以来,西方艺术、美学领域对这个问题的关注就没有停止过。特别是艺术、美学流变转型时,对艺术终结的讨论就更趋频繁。艺术终结是现代的产物,因为作为终结主体的艺术是现代的产物。艺术终结作为现代的产物,它与艺术体制合法性危机有关。当新兴艺术实践完全突破了艺术体制的限制时,艺术体制的合法性面临着被解构的危险,艺术终结也就被提出。 本文从艺术终结的代表性观点、艺术终结与艺术体制的关系、艺术终结的中国式表征等三个方面来讨论艺术终结问题。引言部分主要概括艺术终结思想的影响与研究意义,艺术终结研究在我国的研究现状及本文的研究思路、方法等。论文主体分三部分：第一部分主要对黑格尔、阿多诺、丹托三人艺术终结思想提出的具体语境的还原,揭示其艺术终结的理论内涵和缺陷。第二部分对艺术终结与艺术体制的关系进行论述,艺术终结既是艺术信仰机制遭遇危机的表现,也是艺术体制合法性危机的表现。艺术终结的提出表征艺术体制的演变。第三部分讨论的是文学终结问题,文学终结作为艺术终结的中国式表征,既有西方影响的作用,也有传统与现实的必然性。结论部分指出当代艺术不仅没有因理论家宣称艺术终结而终结,反而焕发出新的生机。
[Abstract]:Since Hegel put forward the end of art in Berlin, the attention of western art and aesthetics has never stopped. Especially in the transition of art and aesthetics, the discussion of the end of art becomes more frequent. The end of art is the product of modern, because the art as the subject of termination is the product of modern. As a modern product, the end of art is related to the crisis of the legitimacy of art system. When the new art practice completely breaks through the limitation of the art system, the legitimacy of the art system is facing the danger of being deconstructed, and the end of the art is put forward. This paper discusses the end of art from three aspects: the representative point of view of the end of art, the relationship between the end of art and the system of art, and the Chinese representation of the end of art. The preface mainly summarizes the influence and significance of the thought of the end of art, the present situation of the study of the end of art in our country and the research ideas and methods of this paper. The main body of the thesis is divided into three parts: the first part mainly restores the concrete context put forward by Hegel Adorno and Danto to reveal the theoretical connotation and defects of his artistic termination. The second part discusses the relationship between the end of art and the system of art. The end of art is not only the manifestation of the crisis of art belief mechanism, but also the manifestation of legitimacy crisis of art system. The end of art represents the evolution of art system. The third part discusses the end of literature. As a Chinese representation of the end of art, the end of literature has not only the influence of the West, but also the inevitability of tradition and reality. The conclusion points out that contemporary art not only ended not because theorists declared the end of art, but also showed new vitality.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：J0
本文编号：2364375
[Abstract]:Since Hegel put forward the end of art in Berlin, the attention of western art and aesthetics has never stopped. Especially in the transition of art and aesthetics, the discussion of the end of art becomes more frequent. The end of art is the product of modern, because the art as the subject of termination is the product of modern. As a modern product, the end of art is related to the crisis of the legitimacy of art system. When the new art practice completely breaks through the limitation of the art system, the legitimacy of the art system is facing the danger of being deconstructed, and the end of the art is put forward. This paper discusses the end of art from three aspects: the representative point of view of the end of art, the relationship between the end of art and the system of art, and the Chinese representation of the end of art. The preface mainly summarizes the influence and significance of the thought of the end of art, the present situation of the study of the end of art in our country and the research ideas and methods of this paper. The main body of the thesis is divided into three parts: the first part mainly restores the concrete context put forward by Hegel Adorno and Danto to reveal the theoretical connotation and defects of his artistic termination. The second part discusses the relationship between the end of art and the system of art. The end of art is not only the manifestation of the crisis of art belief mechanism, but also the manifestation of legitimacy crisis of art system. The end of art represents the evolution of art system. The third part discusses the end of literature. As a Chinese representation of the end of art, the end of literature has not only the influence of the West, but also the inevitability of tradition and reality. The conclusion points out that contemporary art not only ended not because theorists declared the end of art, but also showed new vitality.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：J0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴子林;;“艺术终结论”:问题与方法[J];北方论丛;2009年01期
2 马美玲;隋丹丹;;艺术终结论:主体性丧失后的困惑[J];边疆经济与文化;2008年11期
3 何建良;;艺术终结研究中的两个问题[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
4 李夫生;消费时代的泛文学化倾向及文学批评向度[J];重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年03期
5 李衍柱;艺术的黄昏与黎明[J];东方论坛(青岛大学学报);2004年04期
6 陈翔勤;黑格尔与当代艺术命运[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年06期
7 邹赞;;艺术终结论与后审美艺术[J];甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
8 李娟;;“后”时代的艺术哲学重建——丹托艺术终结论述评[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
9 肖明华;;穿越祛魅——文学转型问题的现代性读解[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年05期
10 王晓渔;;当代中国文学为何退出公共领域[J];江苏社会科学;2008年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 刘悦笛;[N];中国社会科学院院报;2007年
2 胡晓明 袁进;[N];社会科学报;2003年
3 刘悦笛;[N];社会科学报;2008年
，本文编号：2364375
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2364375.html
