《林中之死》与《献给艾米丽的玫瑰》对比研究
发布时间:2018-02-16 01:34
本文关键词: 《林中之死》 《献给艾米丽的玫瑰》 叙述模式 主人公 主题 出处:《山东师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本文以《林中之死》和《献给爱米丽的玫瑰》为文本,对其进行对比分析。本文在叙事理论、生态女性主义及其他理论的指导下,从叙述模式、主人公层面及文章主题三个方面对两个文本进行了对比分析。虽然这三个方面不能全面地概括分析两篇文章的相同与不同之处,但也能够提供一个阅读理解两篇短篇小说的比较新颖的视角和立足点,在对比之下更能够透析两篇文章的艺术价值。 本文一共分为五部分。引言部分介绍了舍伍德·安德森和威廉·福克纳两位作家,以及他们的代表作《林中之死》与《献给爱米丽的玫瑰》,为后文的论述做了铺垫。之后本文介绍了在中外文学史上已经对这两位作家及他们的这两部代表作所作出的研究。第一章会从整体的框架对两篇故事进行比较,即从叙述模式、叙事手法和叙事顺序方面对其进行分析。在这一章中,本文会研究两部作品的叙述视角以及语言中蕴含的象征意义。在对《林中之死》及《献给爱米丽的玫瑰》两文的结构进行一定比较之后,本文在第二章具体阐述了文章主人公的相同及不同,这一部分运用了心理学家马斯洛的需要层次理论来分析两位主人公毕生追求,接下来又以生态女性主义为指导,探究两位主人公悲剧结局的根本原因,这也有助于阐明两篇文章所著时代的时代背景。对文章框架及人物进行分析之后,本文在第三章从主题这一角度来进行对比,从死亡及孤独两个方面来透析文本,并且运用了弗洛伊德的生本能与死本能阐述主人公之死的可能性及必然性。最后一部分为全文的总结部分,,从整体概括全文。 总之,《林中之死》与《献给爱米丽的玫瑰》两部作品之前存在许多共同之处,本文就其中的三个共同点进行对比研究。本文的三个主要章节从结构到人物再到主题层层递进,最终表明两部文本的相同之处确实存在并且对当初的创作背景及社会意义都有一定程度的呈现。
[Abstract]:This paper takes "death in the Forest" and "Rose for Emily" as the texts to make a contrastive analysis of them. Under the guidance of narrative theory, eco-feminism and other theories, this paper discusses the narrative model. The protagonist and the theme of the two texts are compared and analyzed in three aspects. Although these three aspects can not generalize and analyze the similarities and differences of the two articles in a comprehensive way, But it can also provide a relatively new perspective and foothold for reading and understanding the two short stories, and it can also analyze the artistic value of the two articles. This article is divided into five parts. The introduction introduces two writers, Sherwood Anderson and William Faulkner, Their masterpieces "death in the Forest" and "Rose for Emily" pave the way for the later discussion. Then this paper introduces the two writers and their two masterpieces in the history of Chinese and foreign literature. The first chapter compares the two stories from the overall framework. That is, it is analyzed from the aspects of narrative mode, narrative technique and narrative sequence. This paper will study the narrative perspective of the two works and the symbolic meaning of the language. After a certain comparison of the structure of the two works, death in the Forest and Rose for Emily, In the second chapter, the author expounds the similarities and differences of the protagonists in the article. In this part, the author uses the theory of hierarchy of needs of psychologist Maslow to analyze the lifelong pursuit of the two protagonists, and then takes eco-feminism as the guide. Exploring the root causes of the tragic ending of the two protagonists will also help to clarify the background of the era of the two articles. After analyzing the frame of the article and the characters, this paper compares the two characters from the perspective of the theme in the third chapter. This paper analyzes the text from the two aspects of death and loneliness, and expounds the possibility and inevitability of the hero's death by using Freud's instinct of life and death. The last part is the summary of the full text, which summarizes the whole text. In a word, there are many things in common between "death in the Forest" and "Rose for Emily". This paper makes a comparative study of the three common points among them. The three main chapters of this paper are progressive from structure to character to theme. Finally, it shows that the similarities of the two texts really exist and have a certain degree of presentation to the original creation background and social significance.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:I712.074
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙小光;弗洛伊德的本能论——中国现当代文学中的生本能与死本能[J];长春工程学院学报(社会科学版);2004年03期
2 石静;;对《林中之死》的生态女性主义解读[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
3 田鹰;;《林中之死》的美学解读[J];电影文学;2008年04期
4 陆勇;异曲同工 一脉相承——试比较分析安德森《林中之死》与福克纳《纪念爱米丽的一朵玫瑰花》[J];海南师范学院学报(社会科学版);2002年06期
5 封一函;安德森的《林中之死》的元小说特征[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2000年05期
6 舒奇志;试析《森林中的死亡》的艺术特色[J];理论与创作;2000年03期
7 卢伟萍;;死亡主题与平实风格——《献给艾米莉的玫瑰》与《林中之死》比较解读[J];绵阳师范学院学报;2008年06期
8 刘新民;主题、人物、艺术手法——《献给爱米丽的玫瑰》阅读札记兼与肖明翰先生商榷[J];名作欣赏;1997年06期
9 薛晓瑾;;论《献给艾米丽的玫瑰》中的象征手法[J];剑南文学(经典教苑);2013年05期
10 邬跃生;;爱的缺失与死的救赎——解读安德森《林中之死》的主题[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年01期
本文编号:1514357
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/1514357.html