论文学阐释的限度

发布时间：2018-06-29 01:46

本文选题：客观主义 + 相对主义　；参考：《广西师范大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】：西方现代以来,在对本质主义的形而上学传统清算和反拨过程中,文学阐释和文学意义的不确定性得到张扬甚至被夸大。有的阐释和批评,如解构主义超出了文本可能性的限度,带来了阐释的混乱和意义的危机。由此,阐释的有效性受到质疑。阐释是否可能,如何可能?文学的意义究竟是如何产生的?文学阐释是否是任意的?这些问题成为亟待解决的问题。对文学阐释限度的考查和文学意义的生成机制的研究,不仅是基于理论自身发展的逻辑,而且也是基于批评实践中的问题。文章从对文学阐释限度的重新界定出发,来说明阐释限度的必要性。对于作为个体的阐释者来说,对文本的理解的阐释和理解总是此在的有限性和历史性的制约。因此,此在性构成了阐释的可能性限度。文学阐释问题说到底是意义生成的问题。在意义生成的主要的要素之中,存在着相互制约的文学解释权之争。作者、文本和读者在意义生成中的作用达到平衡才能使阐释合乎阐释限度的要求。具体说来,阐释限度既指意义的限度,也指阐释活动的限度。文学文本意义的生成总是受到作者为文本提供的可能性以及读者的此在性的制约,作为阐释活动的文学阐释也受到了文化和意识形态的制约。因此,阐释限度的构成包括作者限度、文本限度和读者限度,以及三者处于特定的文化和意识形态语境中的相互制约的关系。有了对阐释限度的重新认识,超越文学阐释中的客观主义和相对主义倾向显得必要和可能。文章以对话理论为基础进行了阐释机制的重建。作为文学阐释活动,对话主要有读者与作者之间的对话,读者与文本之间的对话和读者与读者之间的对话三种形式。这三种对话是文学意义生成的主要方式。文学阐释不是封闭的,而是开放的;而这种开放是基于一定可能性和限度的开放,阐释活动是从有限向无限的意义生成活动。
[Abstract]:Since modern times in the West, the uncertainty of literary interpretation and literary meaning has been publicized and even exaggerated in the process of metaphysical traditional liquidation and counter-appropriation of essentialism. Some interpretations and criticisms, such as deconstruction, exceed the limits of the possibility of text, and lead to confusion of interpretation and crisis of meaning. As a result, the validity of interpretation is called into question. Is it possible and how is it possible? How does the meaning of literature come into being? Is literary interpretation arbitrary? These problems have become an urgent problem to be solved. The study of the limits of literary interpretation and the formation mechanism of literary meaning is based not only on the logic of the development of the theory itself, but also on the problems in the practice of criticism. Starting from the redefinition of the limits of literary interpretation, this paper explains the necessity of the limits of interpretation. As an individual interpreter, the interpretation and understanding of the text is always limited and historical. Therefore, this nature constitutes the limit of the possibility of interpretation. The problem of literary interpretation is, in the final analysis, the problem of meaning generation. Among the main elements of meaning generation, there is a struggle for the power of literary interpretation which restricts each other. The author, the text and the reader can achieve the balance in the meaning generation so that the interpretation can meet the requirements of the interpretation limit. Concretely speaking, the limit of interpretation refers to the limit of meaning as well as the limit of interpretation activity. The generation of the meaning of literary text is always restricted by the possibility provided by the author for the text and the reader's being, and the literary interpretation as an interpretive activity is also restricted by culture and ideology. Therefore, the composition of the interpretation limit includes the author limit, the text limit and the reader limit, as well as the relationship between them in the specific cultural and ideological context. With a new understanding of the limits of interpretation, it is necessary and possible to transcend the tendency of objectivism and relativism in literary interpretation. Based on the theory of dialogue, this paper reconstructs the explanation mechanism. As a literary interpretation activity, the dialogue mainly includes the dialogue between the reader and the author, the dialogue between the reader and the text, and the dialogue between the reader and the reader. These three kinds of dialogues are the main way to generate literary meaning. Literary interpretation is not closed, but open, and this opening is based on certain possibilities and limits of openness, interpretation activity is from limited to infinite meaning generated activities.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I0

【引证文献】