从跨文化角度论译者在文学翻译中的主体地位

发布时间：2018-12-06 21:25

【摘要】： 在翻译史上对译者的定位问题有着许多不同的说法，各家各派各执一端，各抒己见，，对翻译链条中的中心环节——译者的角色问题进行了各种有益的探讨。本文作者认为把译者定为原作者的积极合作者最为合适，因为译者一方面要“合作”，即承受一定的规则约束，另一方面译者毕竟是合作伙伴，而不是奴仆，即扮演着积极的角色。这就道出了译者主体地位的内涵，即主体地位一方面体现在译者的受限性上，同时更重要的是体现在他的主体性上，而主体性的核心是积极能动性和创造性。文学翻译历史悠久，有着自己的特色，且文学是文化的主要载体之一，对译者的角色问题有着更多的争论。本文作者试图从文化交流的角度讨论译者在文学翻译中的主体地位问题，以便译者在认清自己主体地位的前提下，充分发挥自己的能动性，创造性，针对具体的情况，具体分析，做着最好的选择以利于文本中文化信息最大程度的传译，更好地服务翻译实践。第一章里作者讨论了在翻译理论和翻译实践中存在的一些主要争论，对一些不同的观点做一简要的说明。第二章作者讨论了文化差异在语言上的反映以说明文化交流的重要性。第三章作者讨论了作为文化交流主要手段的文学翻译以揭示文学翻译的跨文化本质。第四五章作者讨论了文学翻译中译者的主体地位，即译者的主体地位一方面反映在他的主体性上另一方面反应在他的受限性上。特别指出主体性和主观性的区别，前者强调创造性，后者却突出任意性。最后一章作者从跨文化角度对译者在文学翻译中的主体地位做了简要的总结。
[Abstract]:In the history of translation, there are many different views on the position of the translator. Each of the different parties holds one end and expresses his own views, and makes various useful discussions on the role of the translator as the central link in the chain of translation. The author believes that it is most appropriate to identify the translator as an active collaborator of the original author, because on the one hand the translator has to "cooperate", that is, to be bound by certain rules; on the other hand, the translator is after all a partner, not a slave. That is to play an active role. This points out the connotation of the translator's subjective position, that is, the subjective position is embodied in the translator's limitation on the one hand and, more importantly, on his subjectivity at the same time, and the core of the subjectivity is positive initiative and creativity. Literary translation has a long history, has its own characteristics, and literature is one of the main carriers of culture, there is more debate on the role of translators. The author tries to discuss the subject position of the translator in literary translation from the angle of cultural exchange, so that the translator can give full play to his initiative, creativity and specific situation under the premise of recognizing his own subjective position. The best choice is made to facilitate the maximum interpretation of cultural information in the text and to better serve translation practice. In the first chapter, the author discusses some main arguments in translation theory and practice, and gives a brief explanation of some different viewpoints. The second chapter discusses the linguistic reflection of cultural differences to illustrate the importance of cultural communication. The third chapter discusses literary translation as the main means of cultural communication to reveal the cross-cultural nature of literary translation. In Chapter four, the author discusses the translator's subjective position in literary translation, that is, the translator's subjective position is reflected in his subjectivity on the other hand, it is reflected in his limitation. The former emphasizes creativity while the latter emphasizes arbitrariness. In the last chapter, the author makes a brief summary of the translator's subjective position in literary translation from the perspective of cross-culture.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：I046

【相似文献】