《说文解字注》引雅学文献研究

发布时间：2018-03-07 15:17

本文选题：段玉裁　切入点：《说文解字》　出处：《苏州大学》2013年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：清代段玉裁的《说文解字注》是中国训诂学史上的名著，体大思精，具有很高的学术价值。目前学术界对《说文解字注》的研究已取得了一定的成果，但研究还不够充分。段玉裁在注解《说文》的过程中，大量引用雅学文献，具体包括《尔雅》及其注本、《小尔雅》、《广雅》及其注本、《埤雅》、《尔雅翼》。本文在对《说文解字注》所引雅学文献进行穷尽性统计的基础上，从各个不同的角度来分析、阐述《说文解字注》所引用的雅学文献，具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。本文共分为6个部分：第一章为绪论。本章介绍段玉裁的生平与著述，概述雅学研究状况，交待本文研究的对象、目的、意义、方法。本文研究的对象为《说文解字注》所引用的雅学文献。研究目的主要是统计《说文解字注》所引雅学文献的数量，揭示段玉裁治雅学之成就，比较《说文解字注》所引《尔雅》与敦煌本《尔雅》在用字上的差异，阐述《尔雅》与《说文》之间的源流关系，揭示《说文》对《广雅》的影响。本文的研究具有积极的意义，不仅能为“《说文》学”、雅学、敦煌学研究提供参考，还能为《说文解字注》研究和段玉裁学术思想研究提供参考。研究方法主要有统计法、比较法、全面考察与重点分析相结合的方法、描写与解释相结合的方法。第二章为《说文解字注》引雅学文献的整体观照。本章举例说明《说文解字注》引雅学文献的内容与方式，统计、分析《说文解字注》所引雅学文献的数量，阐述《说文解字注》引雅学文献的目的与作用，并指出其失误与不足。最后论述许惟贤整理本对《说文解字注》所引雅学文献的校释。第三章是从《说文解字注》看段玉裁治雅学之成就。本章通过梳理段玉裁对《尔雅》及其注本的校订、注释、评论，，揭示段玉裁治《尔雅》之成就与不足。将段玉裁对《广雅》的校释与王念孙《广雅疏证》进行比较，揭示段玉裁治《广雅》之成就与不足。第四章为《说文解字注》所引《尔雅》及郭璞注与敦煌写本之比较。敦煌文献中包含白文《尔雅》和《尔雅注》，二者均为残卷。本章从俗字、通假字、异体字、古今字、同形字、误字6个方面，将《说文解字注》所引《尔雅》及郭璞注与敦煌本进行比较，阐明二者在用字上的差异。第五章为《说文解字注》所引《尔雅》与《说文》之比较。《说文解字注》在大量引用《尔雅》的同时，又在一定程度上揭示了《尔雅》对《说文》的影响。本章以《说文解字注》为平台，从用字、释义、训诂体例三个方面比较《尔雅》与《说文》之异同，并利用段注中已有的考证和结论，进一步揭示《尔雅》与《说文》之间的源流关系。第六章为《说文解字注》所引《广雅》与《说文》之比较。《说文解字注》在大量引用《广雅》的同时，又在一定程度上揭示了《说文》对《广雅》的影响。本章以《说文解字注》为平台，从用字、释义、训诂体例三个方面比较《说文》与《广雅》之异同，并利用段注中已有的考证和结论，进一步揭示《说文》对《广雅》的影响。最后是结语。
[Abstract]:Duan Yu-cai 's "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes" is a famous work in the history of Chinese exegetics, which is of great academic value. At present, some achievements have been made in academic research on Shuowen Jie Zi Notes. But the study was not enough. Duan Yu-cai cited a lot of elegant literature in the process of annotating "Shuo Wen". It includes < Erya > and its notes, < Xiao er ya >, < Guang ya > and their notes, Pi'ya >, < er Yayi >. Based on the exhaustive statistics of the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note, this paper analyzes it from different angles. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to expound the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. This paper is divided into six parts:. The first chapter is the introduction. This chapter introduces Duan Yu-cai 's life and works, summarizes the research situation of elegance, explains the object, purpose and significance of this study. Methods. The object of this study is the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. The purpose of this study is to count the number of elegant literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note, and to reveal the achievements of Duan Yu-cai 's elegant study. Comparing the differences between < Erya] cited in Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note and Dunhuang text < Erya >, and expounding the relationship between < er ya > and Shuo Wen, The research in this paper is of positive significance, which not only provides reference for the study of "Shuo Wen >," but also for the study of elegance and Dunhuang. It can also be used as a reference for the study of Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes and Duan Yu-cai 's academic thoughts. The research methods mainly include statistical method, comparative method, comprehensive investigation method combined with emphasis analysis, and method of combining description with explanation. The second chapter is the overall view of the literature on "Shuowenjiezi Notes". This chapter illustrates the contents and methods of the "Shuowenjiezi Notes", statistics, and analyses the quantity of the "Shuowenjiezi Notes". This paper expounds the purpose and function of introducing refined literature and points out its mistakes and shortcomings. Finally, Xu Weixian collates the correct interpretation of the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. The third chapter looks at the achievements of Duan Yuxianzhi's elegance from the "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes". This chapter combs Duan Yu-cai 's revision, comments and comments on "Erya" and its notes. This paper reveals the achievements and shortcomings of Duan Yu-xianzhi "er Ya", compares Duan Yu-cai 's interpretation of "Guangya" with Wang Niansun's "Guangya sparse Syndrome", and reveals the achievements and shortcomings of Duan Yu-xie 's "Guangya". Chapter 4th is the comparison of < Erya >, Guo Pu's notes and Dunhuang's manuscripts cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. The Dunhuang literature contains white language < Erya > and < Erya Note >, both of which are residual volumes. This chapter is based on vulgar characters, common false characters, variant characters, ancient and modern characters. In this paper, the author compares the "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note" and Guo Pu's notes with Dunhuang text in order to clarify the difference between them in the use of Chinese characters. Chapter 5th is a comparison between < Erya > and "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" cited in < Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note >. To a certain extent, it also reveals the influence of < Erya > on Shuowen. This chapter compares the similarities and differences between < Erya > and "Shuowen" from three aspects: the use of characters, the interpretation and the style of exegesis. Based on the textual research and conclusions in the paragraph notes, the relationship between < Erya > and "Shuowen" is further revealed. Chapter 6th is a comparison between "Guangya" and "Shuowen" cited in "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes". To a certain extent, it also reveals the influence of Shuowen on Guangya. This chapter compares the similarities and differences between Shuowen and Guangya from three aspects: the use of characters, the interpretation of characters, and the style of exegesis. The influence of Shuowen on Guangya is further revealed by the textual research and conclusion in the notes. The last is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H131;H161

【参考文献】