公共辩论电视谈话节目《金星撞火星》的话语策略分析

发布时间：2018-03-09 12:13

本文选题：公共辩论电视谈话节目　切入点：合作原则　出处：《东北师范大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着我国电视媒体行业的迅速发展，公共辩论电视谈话节目作为一种新型谈话类节目逐渐走入人们的视线并引起广泛关注。《金星撞火星》是2012年星空卫视的一档全新辩论型谈话节目。虽播出时间不长，但该节目得到观众广泛认可。《金星撞火星》节目十分创新地将个人脱口秀和公共辩论谈话结合在一起，其中后者为此节目的重点和看点所在。本文的研究即关注节目中的公共辩论部分。这一环节的关键因素包括：主持人、具有争议性的话题或事件、双方嘉宾。所谓双方嘉宾，即事件当事人和相关专家。通常这两方嘉宾对话题持有完全相反的观点。因此可以看出，《金星撞火星》的重点在于一个“撞”字，其每一期的话题均为当周发生的一些具有争议性的社会事件。由金星担当主持的这档节目直击中国人的生存现状，直言中国人的处事方式和思维角度。本文基于定性分析，以目的原则和合作原则为理论基础，旨在揭示在公共辩论谈话类节目中，不同的参与者如何使用不同的话语策略以实现自身目的。本文第一章主要介绍了本次研究的研究背景，研究问题，研究意义及本论文的结构安排。第二章则主要从公共辩论电视谈话节目和话语策略两方面对前人的研究进行了分析，总结和评价。在第三章中，在合作原则和目的原则的基础上形成了本研究的理论基础。第四章则介绍了本文的研究方法、数据的采集、语料的转写和数据分析步骤。第五章包涵了本文最重要的内容。首先依据目的原则中目的关系理论，，本章第一节详细分析了节目《金星撞火星》中不同参与者之间的目的关系。然后根据对数据的分析，本章第二节从提问和反馈两方面对主持人的话语策略进行了详细的分析。第三节则从攻击和辩护两方面分析了嘉宾常用的话语策略。研究发现，主持人在节目中常使用不同类型的提问方式以实现自身不同的目的，且主持人常用的反馈方式包括：非词汇化发声，实词，话语补充，重复和疑问。嘉宾常使用的攻击策略包括直接否定，抓住对方错误，反问，和欲抑先扬。而嘉宾常用的辩护策略则包括转移话题，提供附加信息，利用权威效应和故意歪曲。最后一章首先对本文的研究结果进行总结，指出此次研究的不足之处，并为今后的相关研究提出建议。总之，本次研究发现，在公共辩论谈话节目中，参与者话语策略的使用要受到其目的的驱使和影响。通过对这种新型电视谈话类节目话语策略的研究，一方面为其他学者对电视节目语言及话语策略的研究提供新的语料，另一方面希望有助于该类节目的参与者更好的使用相关话语策略，以达到更好的节目效果。此外，对话语策略的研究也有助于人们提高自我表达和交流能力。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's television media industry, Public debate TV talk show, as a new type of talk show, has gradually come to the attention of people and attracted widespread attention. Venus hits Mars is a new debate talk show on Star Satellite TV on 2012. But the show is well received by viewers. Venus hits Mars is a very innovative combination of personal talk shows and public debate talks. The latter one is the focus and focus of the program. The research in this paper focuses on the public debate part of the program. The key factors in this link include: host, controversial topic or event, guests of both sides. The so-called guests of both sides. That is, the event parties and related experts. Usually the two guests held completely opposite views on the topic. Therefore, it can be seen that the focus of Venus on Mars is a "collision" word. Each issue is about controversial social events that occurred that week. The show, hosted by Venus, directly attacks the survival of the Chinese people and speaks out about their ways of doing things and thinking. Based on qualitative analysis and on the basis of the Skopos principle and the Cooperative principle, this paper aims to reveal how different participants use different discourse strategies to achieve their goals in public debate talk shows. The first chapter mainly introduces the research background, the research problems, the significance and the structure of this thesis. The second chapter mainly analyzes the previous studies from two aspects: public debate TV talk show and discourse strategy. In Chapter 3, the theoretical basis of this study is formed on the basis of the principles of cooperation and purpose. Chapter 4th introduces the research methods, data collection, data transliteration and data analysis steps. Chapter 5th contains the most important content of this paper. First, according to the theory of purpose relation in the principle of purpose, the first section of this chapter analyzes in detail the relationship between the different participants in the program "Venus collides with Mars," and then according to the analysis of the data, In the second section of this chapter, the author makes a detailed analysis of the moderator's discourse strategies from the aspects of questioning and feedback, while the third section analyzes the speech strategies commonly used by the guests from the aspects of attack and defense. In the program, the host often uses different types of questions to achieve his different purposes, and the feedback methods commonly used by the host include: non-lexical vocalization, notional words, utterance supplement, etc. Repetition and doubt. The attacking strategies often used by guests include direct negation, catching each other's mistakes, asking questions, and trying to restrain the first. The usual defense strategies of guests include shifting the topic, providing additional information, using the authority effect and deliberately distorting. The last chapter summarizes the results of this study, points out the shortcomings of this study, and puts forward some suggestions for future research. In conclusion, this study found that the use of discourse strategies of participants in public debate talk shows is driven and influenced by their purpose. On the one hand, it provides new data for other scholars to study the language and discourse strategies of TV programs, on the other hand, it hopes to help the participants of this kind of programs to use the relevant discourse strategies better, so as to achieve better program effects. The study of discourse strategies also helps people to improve their self-expression and communication ability.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G222;H136

【参考文献】