言语冲突视角下的机智回应研究

发布时间：2018-04-28 17:20

本文选题：言语冲突 + 机智性　；参考：《哈尔滨师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：冲突性对话是日常会话的常见现象，目前对言语冲突的研究属于学术热点，许多学者都从各个方面对冲突性交际现象进行考察与讨论；但是从整体上看，这些研究多是对结构的描写和方式的分类，，只有少数文章涉及到了对交际者心理认知的探究。本文立足于言语行为，从影视剧本、网络视频、网络小说、娱乐杂志和论辩艺术文集中筛选了111个机智回应性的对话作为语料，从修辞、语用、认知三个方面，结合定性与定量分析，探求机智回应语的回击义与冒犯语的冒犯义是如何联系的。我们先对机智回应进行界定，认为这是一种言语行为；再根据方式的不同，把机智回应分为仿拟式和延伸式两大类，仿拟式按照对形式和意义的侧重不同，分为严式和宽式两个小类，严式侧重形式的仿拟，要求回应语和冒犯语在字数上相同，在结构上一致；宽式侧重意义的仿拟，对字数和结构特征要求不严，但意义上必须对应；而延伸式强调回应语对冒犯语的“再加工”，从冒犯语中推导出回击语，实现机智回应；这种延伸可以从行为、身份、逻辑关系三个方面进行。我们还从交际策略的角度对机智回应进行了研究，回应者可以从语义场联想、设彀自投、无中造有和空间位置四个角度组织回击话语，认为交际者是从发挥主观能动性，充分调动知识、阅历等方面达到自卫回击的目的。论文最后提出并探讨了如下问题：回击时的道德底线把握、回击力度的衡量问题等；尤其是回应人在组织回击话语时要充分考虑到对方与自己的关系，并推测其话语的真实意图，对回击力度要有一个理性的把握。
[Abstract]:Conflict dialogue is a common phenomenon in daily conversation. At present, the study of speech conflict is a hot topic in academic circles. Many scholars have studied and discussed the phenomenon of conflict communication from various aspects, but on the whole, Most of these studies are about the description of structure and the classification of ways. Only a few articles are concerned with the inquiry into the psychological cognition of communicators. Based on speech acts, this paper selects 111 witty and responsive dialogues from film and television scripts, network videos, network novels, entertainment magazines and argumentation art collections as corpus, from three aspects: rhetoric, pragmatics and cognition. Combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, this paper explores the relationship between the offensive meaning of the tact response and the offensive meaning of the offending language. We first define tact response as a speech act. Then, according to the different ways, we divide the tact response into two categories: parody and extension. The parody is different according to the emphasis on form and meaning. It can be divided into two subcategories: strict type and broad type. Strict type emphasizes the imitation of form, which requires the response language and offensive language to be the same in number of words and the same in structure, and the parody with wide emphasis on meaning is not strict in number and structural characteristics, but it must be corresponding in meaning. The extension emphasizes the "reprocessing" of the offending language, and deduces the response language from the offending language to realize the witty response. This extension can be carried out from three aspects: behavior, identity and logical relationship. We also study tact response from the angle of communication strategy. The responder can organize the response discourse from four angles: semantic field association, self-investment, non-creation and spatial position. The author thinks that the communicator can play his subjective initiative. Fully mobilize knowledge, experience and other aspects to achieve the purpose of self-defense. At the end of the paper, the following questions are raised and discussed: the moral bottom line in the response, the measurement of the strength of the response, especially the response person should fully consider the relationship between the other side and himself when organizing the response words. And speculate the true intention of his words, and should have a rational grasp of the response strength.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136

【相似文献】