“连”字句与“甚至”句的对比研究

发布时间：2018-06-09 00:25

本文选题：连 + 甚至　；参考：《北京大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：“连”字句和“甚至”句都是现代汉语中常用的句式。学界对“连”字句和“甚至”句都已经进行了比较深入的研究，特别是“连”字句，学者们的研究涉及句法、语义、语用、构式等多个方面。与此同时，学界普遍认为，“连”字句与“甚至”句非常相似，但很少有学者对两者的异同进行系统、深入的研究。就现有的关于“连”字句和“甚至”句对比分析的研究成果来看，一方面学者对两者的语料研究得不充分，导致句法方面的对比分析仍不够全面；另一方面学者在两者语义、语用上的对比研究不够系统，也不够深入。本文以此为着眼点，以三个平面理论为主要理论基础，通过对大量现代汉语语料进行研究分析，较为全面地对比描写出“连”字句和“甚至”句在句法方面的异同，再进一步深入分析两者的语义内涵，并通过语义图等表述方式讨论两者语义上的异同，最后从主观性和焦点的范围与性质这两个语用功能讨论两者语用上的差异，力求对“连”字句和“甚至”句进行多角度、多层面的对比研究。
[Abstract]:"Lian" sentence and "even" sentence are common sentence patterns in modern Chinese. The academic circles have already carried on the comparatively thorough research to the "Lian" sentence and the "even" sentence, especially the "Lian" sentence, the scholar's research involves the syntax, the semantic, the pragmatics, the construction and so on many aspects. At the same time, scholars generally think that "Lian" sentence is very similar to "even" sentence, but few scholars systemically and deeply study their similarities and differences. On the one hand, scholars have not done enough research on the corpus of the two sentences, which leads to the comparative analysis of syntax is still not comprehensive; on the other hand, the scholars in the two semantics, The contrastive study of pragmatics is not systematic and deep enough. Based on the three plane theories, this paper studies and analyzes a large number of modern Chinese corpus. The syntactic similarities and differences between "Lian" sentence and "even" sentence are compared, and their semantic connotations are further analyzed, and their semantic similarities and differences are discussed by means of semantic graph. Finally, from the perspective of subjectivity and the scope and nature of the focus, this paper discusses the pragmatic differences between the two pragmatic functions, and tries to make a multi-angle and multi-level contrastive study of "Lian" and "even" sentences.
【学位授予单位】：北京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】