语言类型学视角下的汉韩名词下位范畴对比
发布时间：2018-11-28 18:14
【摘要】：名词作为汉韩两种语言最基本的词类范畴之一，不仅数量上占优势，语法地位也十分重要。因此，汉韩名词的对比研究具有非常重要的意义。但是长期以来，无论是汉语还是韩国语，受西方动词中心论观点的影响，更多地注重动词的研究，而关于名词的本质及其在句子中所起作用的相关研究却略显薄弱。汉韩名词的本体研究数量不多，而对于汉韩名词下位分类的对比研究更是处于起步阶段。 鉴于此，本论文以探究汉韩名词下位分类中体现出来的汉韩两种语言的普遍性，并揭示两种语言中分类标准的异同为目的。从此研究目的出发，本文以语言类型学理论为基础，将汉韩名词下位分类分为概念-语义视角下的名词下位范畴和形态-句法视角下的名词下位范畴进行考察，探究汉韩名词下位分类标准的特性，揭示在类型学视角下汉韩名词下位分类的差异。特别是汉韩名词下位分类的共性和个性，找出普遍性和变量，并将其应用于第二语言教育。 本文在语言类型学视角下，通过比较考察汉韩两种基本语序、形态和语序皆不相同的两种语言的名词下位范畴，得到普遍化的推论。在普遍语法的角度上，有着重要的理论意义和实际意义。 同时，希望本研究成果能给国内学生的韩国语学习以及韩国人的汉语学习提供一定的帮助。
[Abstract]:Nouns, as one of the most basic parts of speech categories in Chinese and Korean languages, are not only quantitatively dominant, but also important in grammar. Therefore, the comparative study of Chinese and Korean nouns is of great significance. However, for a long time, whether in Chinese or Korean, more attention has been paid to the study of verbs under the influence of the western view of verb centralism, but the research on the essence of nouns and their role in sentences has been slightly weak. The Noumenon study of Chinese and Korean nouns is not many, and the comparative study of the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns is in its infancy. In view of this, the purpose of this thesis is to explore the universality of the Chinese and Korean languages embodied in the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns, and to reveal the similarities and differences of the classification standards in the two languages. Based on the theory of linguistic typology, this paper divides the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns into the category of noun subposition from the perspective of concept and semantics and the category of noun subposition from the perspective of Morphology and syntax. This paper probes into the characteristics of Chinese and Korean noun subposition classification standards, and reveals the differences of Chinese and Korean noun subposition classification from the perspective of typology. In particular, the generality and individuality of the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns are found out and applied to second language education. From the perspective of linguistic typology, this paper makes a comparative study of the noun subcategory of two languages in which Chinese and Korean basic word order, form and word order are different, and obtains a generalized inference. From the perspective of universal grammar, it has important theoretical and practical significance. At the same time, it is hoped that the results of this study will be helpful to the study of Korean and Chinese.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146;H55
本文编号：2363833
[Abstract]:Nouns, as one of the most basic parts of speech categories in Chinese and Korean languages, are not only quantitatively dominant, but also important in grammar. Therefore, the comparative study of Chinese and Korean nouns is of great significance. However, for a long time, whether in Chinese or Korean, more attention has been paid to the study of verbs under the influence of the western view of verb centralism, but the research on the essence of nouns and their role in sentences has been slightly weak. The Noumenon study of Chinese and Korean nouns is not many, and the comparative study of the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns is in its infancy. In view of this, the purpose of this thesis is to explore the universality of the Chinese and Korean languages embodied in the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns, and to reveal the similarities and differences of the classification standards in the two languages. Based on the theory of linguistic typology, this paper divides the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns into the category of noun subposition from the perspective of concept and semantics and the category of noun subposition from the perspective of Morphology and syntax. This paper probes into the characteristics of Chinese and Korean noun subposition classification standards, and reveals the differences of Chinese and Korean noun subposition classification from the perspective of typology. In particular, the generality and individuality of the subcategory of Chinese and Korean nouns are found out and applied to second language education. From the perspective of linguistic typology, this paper makes a comparative study of the noun subcategory of two languages in which Chinese and Korean basic word order, form and word order are different, and obtains a generalized inference. From the perspective of universal grammar, it has important theoretical and practical significance. At the same time, it is hoped that the results of this study will be helpful to the study of Korean and Chinese.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146;H55
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 A.Y.Aikhenvald;张峧;;《分类词——名词分类系统的类型》介绍[J];当代语言学;2009年03期
2 高航;语言类型学中的词类问题[J];外国语言文学;2003年01期
3 刘顺;现代汉语名词研究述评[J];韩山师范学院学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
4 王辰玲;;界定名词和动词的认知语法范畴[J];科教文汇(上旬刊);2009年10期
5 刘顺;认知视点下的现代汉语名词研究[J];南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年03期
6 施春宏;;试析名词的语义结构[J];世界汉语教学;2002年04期
7 金立鑫;;语言类型学——当代语言学中的一门显学[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2006年05期
8 王惠;;现代汉语名词非自由义句法功能研究[J];语言研究;2006年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王小春;现代汉语名词语义研究[D];西北师范大学;2007年
2 韩红敏;韩国语分类词和中国语量词对比及教学方法[D];延边大学;2010年
，本文编号：2363833
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2363833.html
