关于文言史的几个问题

发布时间：2018-03-29 08:05

本文选题：汉语史　切入点：文言　出处：《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：在"新汉语史"的框架下,分析文言史上的问题可以看出,第一,文言史是复线而不是单线的。文言史包含两条线索:一是同质文言史,二是异质文言史。第二,文言在现代汉语中并未"死亡",仍然存在,也从未离开。从另一个角度说,文言史并未终结,仍在持续;其三,异质文言是沟通古今的桥梁。新汉语史的构建,可以为梳理现代汉语的来龙去脉提供另一种思路和角度,是建立异质文言史的一种努力和尝试。
[Abstract]:Under the framework of "History of New Chinese", it can be seen from the analysis of the problems in the history of classical Chinese that, first, the history of classical Chinese is double-line, not single-line. The history of classical Chinese contains two clues: one is the history of homogenous classical Chinese, the other is the history of heterogeneous classical Chinese. Classical Chinese is not "dead" in modern Chinese, still exists and never leaves. From another perspective, the history of classical Chinese is not over, it is continuing; third, heterogeneous classical Chinese is a bridge between ancient and modern. It can provide another way of thinking and angle for combing the background of modern Chinese, and it is an effort and attempt to establish the history of heterogeneous classical Chinese.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“百年汉语发展演变数据平台建设与研究”(13&ZD133)
【分类号】：H1-09

【相似文献】