情态副词“非得”的多维度考察

发布时间：2018-03-29 13:41

  本文选题：情态副词　切入点：非得　出处：《延边大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文主要运用三个平面理论对现代汉语中的"非得"进行详细的考察,根据情态的基本概念确定其情态副词的地位,并对其进行语义、句法及语用方面的分析。文章分为五部分:第一章绪论部分,主要介绍研究目的及意义、研究对象及范围,确定"非得"的情态副词地位,综述研究现状,并对文章的研究方法和语料来源做了说明。第二章先分析"非"和"得"各自的语义,然后重点分析"非得"表达的三种情态义,即动力情态、道义情态和认识情态。动力情态表达当事人或说话人的主观意愿;道义情态一方面表达情理事理上的必要性,另一方面表达说话人的指令;认识情态则表达说话人的主观判断。此外本章节还简要分析了"非得"和"非","非得"和"非得X不可"的语义侧重点的不同。第三章对"非得"进行句法方面的分析,"非得"在句法分布上大部分位于主谓之间,句法功能上它主要是作状语,但并不是单纯地作状语,而是具有述谓性。"非得"与体标记"了"、"着"、"过"搭配时具有不同的情态义,并不存在内部的一致性。"非得"和副词"就"的共现频率较高,和副词"也"、"还"的共现频率次之,它们在语义上相融,都具有主观性。一些因素还能帮助我们判断"非得"表达的情态义,如人称、"不可"的有无、事件的性质、和"要"的搭配、假设复句的影响以及否定形式等。第四章考察"非得"在语用方面的表现,语气上"非得"主要用于陈述语气,其次是疑问语气,祈使语气使用最少。言语行为上,"非得"表达动力情态时主要涉及承诺行为和指令性行为;表达道义情态时主要涉及指令性行为和表述性言语行为;表达认识情态时则只涉及表述性言语行为。此外"非得"还具有突出焦点、强化口气的作用。最后是结语部分,对本篇论文做最后的总结说明,并指出了论文的不足以及需要进一步探讨的问题。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly uses three plane theories to make a detailed investigation of the "must" in modern Chinese, determines the status of its modal adverbs according to the basic concept of modality, and carries on the semantics to them. The thesis is divided into five parts: the first chapter introduces the purpose and significance of the research, the object and scope of the study, the status of the modal adverb "must", and summarizes the current situation of the research. The second chapter first analyzes the semantics of "no" and "get", and then analyzes the three modal meanings expressed by "must", that is, dynamic modality. Moral modality and cognitive modality. Dynamic modality expresses the subjective will of the person concerned or the speaker; on the one hand, the moral modality expresses the necessity of reasonableness, on the other hand, it expresses the instruction of the speaker. Cognitive modality expresses the subjective judgment of the speaker. In addition, this chapter briefly analyzes the differences between the semantic emphases of "do" and "no", "need" and "do X". Chapter three deals with syntactic aspects of "need". The syntactic distribution of "compulsory" is mostly between subject-predicate, In syntactic function, it is mainly used as adverbial, but not simply as adverbial, but as predicate. "must" and "aspect" "," "Zhe", "too" have different modal meanings when collocation. There is no internal consistency. The co-occurrence frequency of "must" and adverb "just" is higher, and the frequency of co-occurrence of adverb "also" and "return" is second. Some factors can also help us to judge the modal meaning of "must", such as the person, the existence or not of "not", the nature of the event, and the combination of "want" and "want". The fourth chapter examines the pragmatic performance of "must", in which "must" is mainly used for declarative mood, followed by interrogative mood. In terms of speech act, the expression of "must" mainly involves the act of commitment and the act of instruction, while the expression of moral modality mainly involves the act of instruction and the act of expression of speech. In order to express the understanding of modality, it only involves expressive speech act. In addition, "must" also has a prominent focus and strengthens the function of tone. Finally, it is the conclusion part, which makes the final summary and explanation of this paper. It also points out the deficiency of the thesis and the problems that need to be further explored.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.3
，

本文编号：1681368