当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 语言艺术论文 >

音义之争和范畴之论对后世语言学研究的影响

发布时间:2018-10-24 19:06
【摘要】:人类认识事物一般经过先命名再分类的过程,这一过程在最初的语言研究中体现为先出现音义之争紧接着如影随形般地出现了对范畴的讨论,前者表现为春秋战国时期的“名”“实”之争和古希腊的“本质”“约定”之争,后者表现为春秋战国时期的类概念、别名、共名的讨论和古希腊的经典范畴之论。中西语言学研究的这种相似性是由社会、思想乃至认知背景的趋同性决定的,但由于语言类型不同,又各自形成了不同的语文学传统,汉语是语义型语言缺少词形变化,形成了重视分类的语文学研究传统;西方语言是语法型语言,词形变化丰富,形成了重视词形变化的语文学研究传统。
[Abstract]:In the initial linguistic study, the process of human cognition usually goes through the process of naming things before classifying them. This process is reflected in the debate of sound and meaning in the first place, followed by the discussion of category. The former is represented by the dispute between "name" and "reality" in the Spring and Autumn and warring States period and the "essence" agreement "in ancient Greece, while the latter is the category concept, alias, common name discussion and classical category theory of ancient Greece during the Spring and Autumn and warring States period. This similarity between Chinese and Western linguistic studies is determined by the convergence of society, thought and even cognitive background. However, due to different language types and different literary traditions, Chinese is a semantic language that lacks lexical changes. The western language is a grammatical language with rich changes in lexical form and a tradition of literary research which attaches importance to the change of lexical form.


本文编号:2292284

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2292284.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7dc64***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com