现代汉语跨类复句研究
发布时间：2019-02-16 13:12
【摘要】：现代汉语跨类复句以邢福义先生的复句三分系统和丁力的《复句三分系统分类的心理依据》为理论基础,说明同一复句句式跨不同复句类别的现象。现代汉语跨类复句不是极个别现象,统计发现现代汉语复句中共存在11个跨类复句句式,例如:“A于是B”、“一A就B”、“一方面A另一方面B”等。因此,我们不仅有必要进一步了解跨类复句的概念,更需要详细解释、归类整理跨类复句。对11个跨类复句进行类别划分,文章分为:跨并列、因果类复句,跨并列、转折类复句,跨因果、转折类复句,跨并列、因果、转折类复句四类。为了全面了解跨类复句,论文每一章选取一个代表性跨类复句从语表形式、语里内容、语用价值三个方面说明解释。依据现代汉语跨类复句的四种分类,跨类复句研究包括四章内容:跨并列、因果类复句“A于是B”。语表形式上,“A于是B”并列类复句和“A于是B”因果类复句主要说明A、B的形式特征、关系词的搭配。语里内容中,“A于是B”并列类复句和“A于是B”因果类复句主要从A、B分句的制约关系和A、B分句的思维表述方面说明解释。语用价值上,“A于是B”并列类复句和“A于是B”因果类复句分为传信功能和情态功能两方面。跨并列、转折类复句“既A又B”。语表形式上,“既A又B”并列类复句和“既A又B”转折类复句分为A、B分句的对称结构特征、后项关系词情况和“但”类词的添加。语里内容中,分析“既A又B”并列类复句和“既A又B”转折类复句A、B分句的主观推测、客观反映和思维表述。语用价值上,分析“既A又B”并列类复句和“既A又B”转折类复句A、B分句的表述功能和情感态度。跨因果、转折类复句“越A越B”。语表形式上,“越A越B”因果类复句和“越A越B”转折类复句中,说明A、B分句的词语性质、前后分句的主语情况和“但”类词的添加。语里内容中,说明“越A越B”因果类复句和“越A越B”转折类复句A、B分句主观推测制约、客观反映真假和思维表述是否一致。语用价值上,说明“越A越B”因果类复句和“越A越B”转折类复句A、B分句的表述功能和情态功能。跨并列、因果、转折类复句“一A就B”。语表形式上,说明“一A就B”并列类复句、因果类复句和转折类复句中A、B分句的词语性质、重复情况和关系词的添加、替换。语里内容中,主观推测层面,解释“一A就B”并列类复句、因果类复句、转折类复句A、B分句的制约关系;客观反映层面,跨并列、因果、转折类复句“一A就B”因果类复句A、B分句的真假情况。此外,分析跨类复句A、B分句的思维表述是否具有一致性。语用价值上,解释“一A就B”并列类复句、因果类复句、转折类复句A、B分句强调焦点的不同,表述情感态度的不同。
[Abstract]:Modern Chinese cross-class complex sentence is based on Mr. Xing Fuyi's three-point system of complex sentence and Ding Li's psychological basis of three-system classification of complex sentence, which explains the phenomenon that the same sentence pattern crosses different complex sentence categories. Modern Chinese cross-class complex sentence is not a very individual phenomenon. Statistics show that there are 11 cross-class complex sentence patterns in modern Chinese complex sentences, such as "A so B", "one A is B", "one A on the other hand" and so on. Therefore, it is necessary not only to understand the concept of cross-class complex sentences, but also to explain and sort them out in detail. This paper classifies 11 cross-class complex sentences into four categories: cross-juxtaposition, cause-and-effect complex sentence, cross-juxtaposition, turning complex sentence, cross-causation, turning complex sentence, cross-juxtaposition, causality and turning complex sentence. In order to fully understand cross-class complex sentences, each chapter selects a representative cross-class complex sentence to explain from three aspects: the form of the language table, the content of the language, and the pragmatic value. According to the four kinds of classification of cross-class complex sentences in modern Chinese, the study of cross-class complex sentences includes four chapters: cross-juxtaposition, causal complex sentences "A so B". In terms of form, "A so B" and "A so B" causality complex mainly explain the formal characteristics of AZB and the collocation of relative words. In the content of the language, "A so B" parallel complex sentences and "A so B" causality complex sentences are mainly explained in terms of the restrictive relation of AZB clauses and the thinking expression of AZB clauses. In terms of pragmatic value, "A so B" parallel complex sentences and "A so B" causality complex sentences can be divided into two aspects: communication function and modal function. Cross-juxtaposition, transition type complex sentence "both A and B". In terms of form, "both A and B" parallel complex sentences and "both A and B" transition complex sentences are divided into the symmetrical structural characteristics of AZB clauses, the latter relative words and the addition of "but" words. In the content of the language, we analyze the subjective conjecture, objective reflection and thinking expression of the juxtaposition complex sentence of "both A and B" and the turning class of "both A and B". In terms of pragmatic value, this paper analyzes the expressive functions and affective attitudes of the juxtaposition complex sentence of "both A and B" and the sentence of "both A and B". Cross causality, transition class complex sentence "A more B". In terms of form, the causality complex sentence of "more A, the more B" and the turning class complex sentence of "Yue A and B" explain the word nature, the subject of the sentence before and after the clause and the addition of the word "but". In the content of the language, it is shown that the causality complex sentence of "the more A is the more B" and the subjective conjecture of the Ajib clause in the turning class of "the more A is the more B", and the objective reflection is whether the truth or falsity is consistent with the expression of thinking. In terms of pragmatic value, it explains the expressive function and modal function of the causality complex sentence of "the more A is the more B" and the turning sentence of "the more A and the more B". Cross-juxtaposition, causality, and transition type complex sentence "one A on B". In terms of form, it explains the word nature, repetition and the addition and replacement of relation words in "A on B" parallel complex sentence, causality complex sentence and turning class complex sentence. In the content of the language, subjective conjecture is used to explain the restrictive relationship between the "one A on B" parallel complex sentence, the causal complex sentence, and the turning class complex sentence AfB clause. Objective reflection level, cross-juxtaposition, causality, turning class complex sentence "one A on B" causality complex sentence of truth and falsehood. In addition, the paper analyzes whether the thinking expression of cross-class complex sentence AZB clause is consistent. In terms of pragmatic value, it explains the differences in the focus and emotional attitude of the parallel complex sentences of "one A on B", the complex sentences of causality and the sentences of turning points.
【学位授予单位】：陕西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.3
本文编号：2424482
[Abstract]:Modern Chinese cross-class complex sentence is based on Mr. Xing Fuyi's three-point system of complex sentence and Ding Li's psychological basis of three-system classification of complex sentence, which explains the phenomenon that the same sentence pattern crosses different complex sentence categories. Modern Chinese cross-class complex sentence is not a very individual phenomenon. Statistics show that there are 11 cross-class complex sentence patterns in modern Chinese complex sentences, such as "A so B", "one A is B", "one A on the other hand" and so on. Therefore, it is necessary not only to understand the concept of cross-class complex sentences, but also to explain and sort them out in detail. This paper classifies 11 cross-class complex sentences into four categories: cross-juxtaposition, cause-and-effect complex sentence, cross-juxtaposition, turning complex sentence, cross-causation, turning complex sentence, cross-juxtaposition, causality and turning complex sentence. In order to fully understand cross-class complex sentences, each chapter selects a representative cross-class complex sentence to explain from three aspects: the form of the language table, the content of the language, and the pragmatic value. According to the four kinds of classification of cross-class complex sentences in modern Chinese, the study of cross-class complex sentences includes four chapters: cross-juxtaposition, causal complex sentences "A so B". In terms of form, "A so B" and "A so B" causality complex mainly explain the formal characteristics of AZB and the collocation of relative words. In the content of the language, "A so B" parallel complex sentences and "A so B" causality complex sentences are mainly explained in terms of the restrictive relation of AZB clauses and the thinking expression of AZB clauses. In terms of pragmatic value, "A so B" parallel complex sentences and "A so B" causality complex sentences can be divided into two aspects: communication function and modal function. Cross-juxtaposition, transition type complex sentence "both A and B". In terms of form, "both A and B" parallel complex sentences and "both A and B" transition complex sentences are divided into the symmetrical structural characteristics of AZB clauses, the latter relative words and the addition of "but" words. In the content of the language, we analyze the subjective conjecture, objective reflection and thinking expression of the juxtaposition complex sentence of "both A and B" and the turning class of "both A and B". In terms of pragmatic value, this paper analyzes the expressive functions and affective attitudes of the juxtaposition complex sentence of "both A and B" and the sentence of "both A and B". Cross causality, transition class complex sentence "A more B". In terms of form, the causality complex sentence of "more A, the more B" and the turning class complex sentence of "Yue A and B" explain the word nature, the subject of the sentence before and after the clause and the addition of the word "but". In the content of the language, it is shown that the causality complex sentence of "the more A is the more B" and the subjective conjecture of the Ajib clause in the turning class of "the more A is the more B", and the objective reflection is whether the truth or falsity is consistent with the expression of thinking. In terms of pragmatic value, it explains the expressive function and modal function of the causality complex sentence of "the more A is the more B" and the turning sentence of "the more A and the more B". Cross-juxtaposition, causality, and transition type complex sentence "one A on B". In terms of form, it explains the word nature, repetition and the addition and replacement of relation words in "A on B" parallel complex sentence, causality complex sentence and turning class complex sentence. In the content of the language, subjective conjecture is used to explain the restrictive relationship between the "one A on B" parallel complex sentence, the causal complex sentence, and the turning class complex sentence AfB clause. Objective reflection level, cross-juxtaposition, causality, turning class complex sentence "one A on B" causality complex sentence of truth and falsehood. In addition, the paper analyzes whether the thinking expression of cross-class complex sentence AZB clause is consistent. In terms of pragmatic value, it explains the differences in the focus and emotional attitude of the parallel complex sentences of "one A on B", the complex sentences of causality and the sentences of turning points.
【学位授予单位】：陕西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 宋增文;;“既A,又B”认知层面分析[J];淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版);2015年04期
2 程亚恒;;“既X也Y”结构的衍生机制与动因[J];河南科技大学学报(社会科学版);2015年01期
3 张静;;论“既然p,难道q(吗)”反问推断句式[J];汉语学习;2014年06期
4 李向阳;;“一A就B”句的认知层面探究[J];绥化学院学报;2014年12期
5 邓天玉;;说“越X,却越Y”[J];汉语学报;2014年03期
6 钟小勇;张霖;;“既然”句和“因为”句主观性差异探[J];汉语学习;2013年04期
7 张桂英;;固定格式“一……就……”语用探微[J];语文学刊;2013年02期
8 罗进军;;有标假设复句的语义关系特征[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年05期
9 赵玉萍;;谈语域的顺应与利用[J];焦作大学学报;2009年01期
10 梁如娥;;语域一致与语域偏离分析[J];郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 宋增文;“如果A，，就B”句式考察[D];陕西理工学院;2016年
本文编号：2424482
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2424482.html
