论莎士比亚《特洛伊罗斯与克瑞西达》的戏谑性

发布时间：2018-03-25 15:51

本文选题：特洛伊罗斯与克瑞西　切入点：戏谑性　出处：《四川外国语大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：《特洛伊罗斯与克瑞西达》是威廉·莎士比亚的中期作品。这部作品自出版以来一直受到广泛的争议。现代批评家普遍把它视为一部悲剧,并且认为该作品是继莎翁四大悲剧之后的第五部悲剧。它根据荷马史诗和中世纪传奇改编而成,尽管在二战后受到了重视,国内外批评家们也从多种角度对其进行了分析和研究,但是焦点主要集中在对这部作品体裁和主题等方面的探讨,而对于文本中的一些重要的特质关注较少,例如文本中普遍存在的戏谑成分。这些戏谑的成分构成了文本的“戏谑性”。学界普遍认为戏谑是喜剧作品不可缺少的要素,而对于悲剧作品而言,“戏谑性”是指作者以喜剧的方式处理悲剧人物和悲剧本身。笔者在对文本中的戏谑成分进行讨论的基础上,进一步深入对莎士比亚幽默艺术的认识,并且以此为例对悲剧作品中戏谑的独特功能展开比较系统的探讨。通过文本细读,笔者发现作者莎士比亚独具匠心地使用了文字游戏,反讽和戏仿等手法。这些隐藏在悲剧文本中的戏谑的表现方式不仅是在塑造角色,构建情节等方面发挥重要的作用,更以一种独特的方式反映了作者本人强烈的反战意识和阶级观念。论文由三个部分组成:第一部分为介绍部分,首先对莎士比亚和《特洛伊罗斯与克瑞西达》这部作品进行简要的介绍,其次是对这部戏剧批评的回顾。第二部分为论文的主体部分,主要从三个方面对这部作品进行讨论。第一章讨论作为戏谑的修辞手段,包括对伊利亚特和乔叟同名诗的戏仿,以喜剧为目的的双关语和悲剧性的反讽。第二章讨论作为戏谑的狂欢。本章以巴赫金的对话和狂欢理论作为基础,进一步发掘文本中的戏谑成分。第三章节着重讨论戏谑的独特功能。第三部分是结论部分,指出:戏谑不仅普遍存在于这部战争和爱情交织的悲剧中,而且为这出悲剧以及剧中角色的悲剧命运施以重彩。同时,莎士比亚以这样一种独特而隐晦的方式表达了自己的反战观点和阶级意识。
[Abstract]:Troilus and Cressida is the intermediate work of William Shakespeare. It has been widely debated since its publication. It is widely regarded by modern critics as a tragedy. It is considered to be the fifth tragedy after Shakespeare's four tragedies. It is based on Homer epic and medieval legends, despite the importance attached to it after World War II. Critics at home and abroad have also analyzed and studied it from a variety of angles, but the focus is mainly on the genre and theme of the novel, but little attention has been paid to some important features of the text. For example, there are a lot of playful elements in the text. These playful elements constitute the "playfulness" of the text. For tragic works, "playfulness" means that the author deals with the tragic characters and the tragedy itself in a comedy way. On the basis of the discussion of the playful elements in the text, the author makes a further understanding of Shakespeare's humorous art. And take this as an example to the tragedy works in the playful unique function carries on the more systematic discussion. Through the text careful reading, the author discovers that the author Shakespeare has used the word game ingeniously, Irony and parody. These playful expressions, hidden in tragic texts, not only play an important role in shaping characters, constructing plots, etc. It also reflects the author's strong anti-war consciousness and class concept in a unique way. The thesis consists of three parts: the first part is the introduction. The first part is a brief introduction to Shakespeare and Troilus and Krissida, and the second is a review of the criticism of the play. The second part is the main part of the thesis. The first chapter deals with the parody of Iliad and Chaucer's poems of the same name as a rhetorical device for banter. This chapter is based on Bakhtin's theory of dialogue and carnival. Chapter three focuses on the unique function of banter. The third part is the conclusion, which points out that banter not only exists in this war and love intertwined tragedy, At the same time, Shakespeare expressed his anti-war views and class consciousness in such a unique and obscure way.
【学位授予单位】：四川外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I561.073

【相似文献】