男性作家是否能像女性作家一样女性主义？柯林斯《白衣女人》与勃朗特《简爱》的比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-30 03:00

本文选题：《白衣女人》 + 《简爱》　；参考：《北京外国语大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：长期以来,虚构与非虚构作品中的女性地位都吸引着世界各地众多批评家的注意。本论文主要着眼维多利亚时期对女性的刻画,并关注维多利亚时期男性小说家与女性小说家的作品比较。本研究通过阅读韦尔基·柯林斯的《白衣女人》和夏洛特·勃朗特的《简爱》,试图分析“女性主义”的男性作家与同立场的女性作家之间的异同。本论文分三章,论证柯林斯和勃朗特以何方式、在何程度上是女性主义作家。在其所处的历史与文学语境下,这两位作家的作品偏离了维多利亚时期对女性地位的主流认识。然而,第三章阐述了这两位作家作品间质的差别。通过对《白衣女人》和《简爱》两部著作的女性主义比较分析,本论文说明虽然柯林斯质疑了女性作家的写作方式,认同勃朗特的女性主义观点,并也常被看作女性主义作家,然而这两位作家对男女人物的刻画、叙述技巧、题目、起首句、结尾的不同都极大有助于发现究竟谁是真正的女性主义作家。论文结尾表明勃朗特确为女性主义作家,而柯林斯虽然质疑女性作家,但并未成为像勃朗特这样的女性作家一样的女性主义作家。因此,作为一位处理女性主义问题的男性作家,柯林斯不应被称作女性主义者,而应因其无法与女性作家在女性主义方面达到同样程度,被称作“亲女性主义”作家。这篇论文有两项目的。其一为审视与修正被视为“女性主义”的男性作家的作品,并提醒读者在称男性作家女性主义者的时候必须谨慎。其次,在区分女性主义的女性作家和亲女性主义的男性作家方面,除了主题研究之外,对男女人物的刻画、叙述技巧、题目、起首句、结尾的研究将促进读者-文本间的联系,也将提升读者的自主性和批判思维的能力。这些方法鼓励读者使用文本证据分析文本,以达到潜入文本、深刻理解与鉴赏的目的。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the status of women in fictional and non-fiction has attracted the attention of many critics around the world. This thesis focuses on the depiction of women in Victorian period and the comparison between male novelists and female novelists in Victorian period. This study attempts to analyze the similarities and differences between the male writers of feminism and the female writers of the same position by reading Welky Collins' woman in White and Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre. This thesis is divided into three chapters to demonstrate how and to what extent Collins and Bronte are feminist writers. In their historical and literary context, the works of these two writers deviate from the Victorian mainstream understanding of the status of women. However, the third chapter expounds the difference between the two writers. Through a comparative analysis of feminism in Women in White and Jane Eyre, this paper shows that although Collins questioned the writing style of female writers and agreed with Bronte's feminist views, it is often regarded as a feminist writer. However, the two writers' portrayal of men and women, narrative skills, title, the first sentence, and the end of the difference greatly help to find out who is the true feminist writer. At the end of the paper, it is shown that Bronte is a feminist writer, but Collins does not become a feminist writer like Bronte, though he questions the female writer. Therefore, as a male writer dealing with feminist issues, Collins should not be called a feminist, but a "pro-feminist" writer because she cannot achieve the same level of feminism as a female writer. This paper has two projects. The first is to examine and revise the works of male writers who are regarded as "feminism", and to remind readers to be careful when calling male writers feminists. Secondly, in distinguishing feminist female writers from pro-feminist male writers, in addition to thematic studies, the study of portrayals, narrative techniques, topics, chapeau, and endings of male and female characters will promote the reader-text relationship. It will also enhance the reader's autonomy and critical thinking ability. These methods encourage readers to use textual evidence to analyze the text in order to penetrate the text, understand and appreciate it deeply.
【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I561.074

【相似文献】