当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 英美文学论文 >

朱鹭三部曲的历史叙事研究

发布时间:2018-05-31 08:38

  本文选题:阿米塔夫·戈什 + 朱鹭三部曲 ; 参考:《河北师范大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:阿米塔夫·戈什(Amitav Ghosh,1956-),是当代印度的著名作家,他立足于个体的戏剧性事件,关心个体的命运,以其强烈的地域感和历史责任感赢得了读者的关注。戈什的朱鹭三部曲描写了鸦片战争前夕印度和中国的社会状况,突出反映了历史语境下个体的命运和情感经验。作品还揭示了英国殖民者的虚假和伪善,批判了全球化背景下西方国家的文化霸权,凸显了他对当代人类社会文化发展的关注与思考。 全文分为五个部分: 绪论部分介绍作家的生平及创作,作家在当代印度英语文学史上的地位,以及国内外对阿米塔夫·戈什及其小说的研究状况,并论述选题的价值及意义。 1、论述历史视角下戈什的文学世界,探讨历史在其作品中的地位,以及历史对其创作的影响。戈什认为历史与小说是可以相互建构的,历史可以写进小说里来,进行历史叙述。小说也可以描写历史,文学不是被动地反映历史事实,,而是通过对复杂的文本化世界的阐释,参与历史意义创造的过程。戈什舍弃一些在历史上有重大影响的大人物,而重视小人物的塑造,通过小人物的对话和命运揭示当时的历史真实以及历史事件对他们生活的影响。 2、论述朱鹭三部曲的历史叙事。首先是意象的历史内涵,分析了作品中最主要的三个船所代表的历史意蕴;其次是语言的历史氛围,戈什在作品中运用了多种语言进行创作,每个人的说话方式都有所不同,代表了不同的文化背景,这些语言的变化和交叉反映了真实的历史场景,呈现了语言的历史变化规律;最后是个体的历史记忆,戈什总是利用人物的记忆来叙述历史,感受历史,构成历史,但是这种虚构却是历史性的真实。 3、历史叙事下的现实关怀。首先,戈什关注于世界文化中转瞬即逝的纽带,重视历史与当下的关系;其次,朱鹭三部曲中对文化霸权的描写为我们反思全球化提供了新的视角,特别是对文化霸权、文化霸权主义、文化帝国主义的理解。 结语部分对全文进行总结,指出戈什在历史语境下对个体命运和情感经验的关注,以及在全球化背景下,对世界文化发展的忧虑与思考。
[Abstract]:Amitav Ghoshen, is a famous writer in contemporary India. He is based on the dramatic events of the individual, cares about the fate of the individual, and has won the reader's attention with his strong sense of region and historical responsibility. Gosh's Egret trilogy describes the social conditions in India and China on the eve of the Opium War and highlights the fate and emotional experience of individuals in the historical context. The works also reveal the hypocrisy and hypocrisy of the British colonists, criticize the cultural hegemony of western countries under the background of globalization, and highlight his concern and reflection on the cultural development of contemporary human society. The full text is divided into five parts: The introduction introduces the writer's life and creation, the writer's position in the history of contemporary Indian English literature, the research status of Amitav Gosh and his novels at home and abroad, and discusses the value and significance of the selected topic. 1. It discusses the literary world of Gosh from the historical perspective, discusses the position of history in his works and the influence of history on his creation. Ghosh believes that history and fiction can be constructed mutually, history can be written into the novel, historical narration. Novels can also describe history. Literature does not passively reflect historical facts, but takes part in the process of historical meaning creation through the interpretation of the complex textual world. Ghosh gave up some great people who had great influence in history, and paid more attention to the shaping of the little people. Through the dialogue and destiny of the little people, he revealed the historical truth of the time and the influence of historical events on their lives. 2. Expound the historical narration of the trilogy. The first is the historical connotation of the image, the analysis of the historical implication of the three most important ships in the works, and the second is the historical atmosphere of the language. In his works, Gosh uses a variety of languages to create works, and each person speaks in a different way. Representing different cultural backgrounds, the changes and intersections of these languages reflect real historical scenes and present the law of historical change of language. Finally, the historical memory of individuals, Gosh always uses the memory of characters to tell history. Experience history, constitute history, but this kind of fiction is historical reality. Third, the realistic concern under the historical narration. First of all, Gosh pays attention to the fleeting ties in world culture and the relationship between history and the present. Secondly, the description of cultural hegemony in the trilogy provides us with a new perspective, especially on cultural hegemony. Cultural hegemonism, the understanding of cultural imperialism. The conclusion part summarizes the full text, points out that Gosh pays attention to individual fate and emotional experience in the historical context, and worries and ponders about the development of world culture under the background of globalization.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:I351.074

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 盛宁;历史·文本·意识形态——新历史主义的文化批评和文学批评刍议[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1993年05期

2 王岳川;新历史主义的文化诗学[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1997年03期

3 芮小河;;曼布克文学奖的是是非非[J];读书;2007年04期

4 丹飞;;从“荒诞”中感悟新历史主义[J];出版参考;2010年Z1期

5 吴义雄;广州外侨总商会与鸦片战争前夕的中英关系[J];近代史研究;2004年02期

6 朱静;;从文化到文化诗学——论格林布拉特的新历史主义[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年04期

7 陈义华;;民族与宗教冲突的根源思考——解读阿米塔夫的小说《阴暗的界限》[J];三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版);2009年03期

8 薛玉凤;;“小历史”中的“大历史”——《疾病解说者》中的历史叙事与文化霸权[J];外国文学研究;2009年03期

9 张进;新历史主义文艺思潮的思想内涵和基本特征[J];文史哲;2001年05期

10 赵静蓉;颠覆和抑制——论新历史主义的方法论意义[J];文艺评论;2002年01期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 傅洁琳;格林布拉特新历史主义与文化诗学研究[D];山东大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 江冰;历史意识与历史叙事的现代质变[D];安徽大学;2003年

2 万信琼;司各特小说的历史叙事研究[D];武汉大学;2004年

3 陈东;尤瑟纳尔小说的历史叙事研究[D];暨南大学;2006年

4 翟传鹏;论王小波小说创作的历史观和历史叙事[D];陕西师范大学;2009年

5 刘前浩;论王小波作品中的历史叙事[D];华中师范大学;2012年



本文编号:1958997

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/1958997.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c033b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com