弗洛伊德与劳伦斯哲学思想对比研究
[Abstract]:Sigmund Freud's theories, such as unconscious and sexual instinct, have exerted a profound influence on the ideology, literature and art of the whole western society. As one of the greatest writers of the same period, Lawrence created a large number of literary works of various genres with his bold and frank language, rich imagination and unique perspective. In their respective fields, both are famous for their originality, and for their bold analysis of the most secretive sexual psychology of mankind. Since the publication of Lawrence's first important work, the son and the Lover, numerous critics have believed that his works originated from Freud's theory. Lawrence publicly stated that he did not agree with Freud's theory. Both of them have made profound exploration and interpretation in the fields of sex, unconsciousness, personal and social relations from different angles. However, after careful study and comparison of their theories, we can see that the two theories have similarities. But there are also essential differences. Based on Lawrence's main works, this paper tries to reveal the connection and divergence between Lawrence and Freud's theory by comparing their interpretations of unconscious, sexual instinct, Oedipus complex and the relationship between individual and civilization. In order to better interpret his literary works. This paper is divided into six parts. The introduction briefly introduces the main contents of Freud's theory and Lawrence's creative ideas, and summarizes the present research situation of their philosophical thoughts at home and abroad. The text includes four chapters: the first chapter makes a comparative analysis of the differences between them in the theory of unconsciousness, the second chapter discusses the different interpretations of sexual instinct and its relationship with human behavior. The third chapter studies the differences between the two from the specific aspect of Oedipus complex and the works of Lawrence. The fourth chapter further discusses the difference between the two in explaining the conflict between individual and civilization. In the last part, the author summarizes the relationship and difference between the two theories, analyzes the limitations of their theories and their causes, and puts forward some suggestions for the reasonable interpretation of Lawrence's works.
【学位授予单位】:中国海洋大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:I561.06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 翁诒谋;;深刻的主题 独特的写法——从《春天的阴影》看劳伦斯的现实主义[J];外国语言文学;1985年04期
2 沈雁;;男性力量的失落与重塑:论劳伦斯笔下男性角色的发展[J];英美文学研究论丛;2006年00期
3 包春梅;;劳伦斯及其作品中女性形象的研究[J];才智;2009年15期
4 史慧风;人性的丧失与拯救──谈劳伦斯作品与《圣经》之比较[J];襄樊学院学报;1999年01期
5 张志宏;刘春芳;李旭;;生命直觉主义在劳伦斯作品中的诠释[J];天津大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
6 陶勇;血性与理性之间的挣扎——论D.H.劳伦斯的《迷失的少女》[J];外国文学研究;1989年03期
7 冯建明;劳伦斯作品中的象征手法[J];邯郸职业技术学院学报;1997年02期
8 黑马;;没有金钱诱欲的踏实之旅——劳伦斯作品影视改编的启示[J];艺术评论;2007年04期
9 桂强;;劳伦斯作品中性爱描写的文化意蕴[J];文学教育(上);2007年03期
10 单伟红;;劳伦斯研究述评[J];时代文学(下半月);2011年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 Joel Kovel;;On Marx and Ecology[A];马克思主义与生态文明论文集[C];2010年
2 Fred Magdoff;;Ecological Civilization November 6,2010[A];马克思主义与生态文明论文集[C];2010年
3 成中英;;对全球性危机的道德反思:作为解决之道的和谐与伦理教养(英文)[A];北京论坛(2009)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——危机的挑战、反思与和谐发展:“化解危机的文化之道——东方智慧”中文分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2009年
4 Chongko Choi;;东亚法的历史与法理基础(英文)[A];北京论坛(2004)文明的和谐与共同繁荣:“法治文明的承继与融合”法律分论坛论文或提要集[C];2004年
5 ;To Develop Ecological Civilization under the Guidance of Marxism[A];马克思主义与生态文明论文集[C];2010年
6 Amartya Kumar Sen;;Our Global Civilization[A];文明的和谐与共同繁荣:对人类文明方式的思考——北京论坛(2006)论文选集[C];2006年
7 Tan Chung;;Where from the“secret of expression”of Chinese civilization?——Historical operation of“chindia”in mining the spiritual and material cultures of China[A];文明的和谐与共同繁荣:对人类文明方式的思考——北京论坛(2006)论文选集[C];2006年
8 ;The Great Change of the Human’s Environment at the Eve of Agricultural Civilization[A];The Influence of Agriculture Origin on Formation of Chinese Civilization--Proceedings of CCAST (World Laboratory) Workshop[C];2001年
9 安东尼·瑞德;;东亚的知识网络——断裂的历史(英文)[A];北京论坛(2004)文明的和谐与共同繁荣:“多文化共存下的记忆与遗忘”历史分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2004年
10 Liaw Yock Fang;;Dialogue Between Civilizations:The Case Of Malay Traditional Literature and Islam[A];北京论坛(2004)文明的和谐与共同繁荣:“多元文学文化的对话与共生”外国文学分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 ;学术论文的伪注问题[N];中华读书报;2002年
2 ;12大绿色IT产品[N];网络世界;2010年
3 清水 编译;绿色IT技术当属谁?[N];计算机世界;2010年
4 本报记者 于o
本文编号:2381837
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2381837.html