论V.S.奈保尔的游记文学

发布时间：2019-02-21 20:15

【摘要】：V.S.奈保尔是一位受到多重文化影响的移民作家。他的祖先之邦是印度,出生于特立尼达,生活在英国,多重的文化背景导致了他有一种对于自身文化身份的不断追寻和探索的热情。这种热情见于他的小说,亦见于他的非虚构类作品。他的非虚构类作品由于混杂了多种文体而独具一格。本文以奈保尔非虚构类作品中的游记为研究对象,在细读文本的基础上,对他的游记作品主题进行逐一分析,由此总结出奈保尔游记创作的特点,并以后殖民理论为支撑,通过分析奈保尔的“无根人”、“流散者”特质,指出他游记创作的终极目的是进行自我身份的追寻。全文除了绪论和结语分为五个部分：绪论部分概述了国内外的奈保尔研究现状,并指出国内对奈保尔游记文学的研究还不够完善。以及游记文学对于奈保尔的意义。主体分为五个部分：第一章是对奈保尔游记文学特点的整体概述。首先对比了奈保尔的游记文学与英国不同时期游记文学,指出奈保尔的游记文学继承并发展了英国游记文学的传统。接着指出游记文学的写作就是他进行文化身份认同的方式。最后分析了奈保尔游记杂糅性的特点。第二、三、四章具体分析了奈保尔各部游记的主题以及奈保尔对他所访问过的国家的态度和评论。通过文本分析,可以看出奈保尔对这些国家和地区始终抱有一种“东方主义”视角下的批判态度。第五章通过分析奈保尔最近的两部游记《南方一瞥》和《印度：百万叛变的今天》,指出奈保尔的叙述方式由作者的主观讲：述到主客观叙述相结合的转变。这种转变也意味着奈保尔摆脱了单纯的“东方主义”视角走向了兼容并包。最后一部分为结语,主要分析了奈保尔对他所来自的三种文化背景的即亲近又疏离的态度。这种态度不仅造就了奈保尔文化“无根者”的身份,也使得他的游记作品呈现杂糅的特点。而这种新型的游记文体也为其它和他经历类似的移民作家的写作提供了新的参考。
[Abstract]:V.S. Naipaul is an immigrant writer influenced by many cultures. His ancestral state is India, born in Trinidad and living in England. His cultural background has led him to pursue and explore his own cultural identity. This enthusiasm can be found in his novels as well as in his non-fiction works. His non-fiction works are unique because of their mixed styles. This paper takes the travels of Naipaul's nonfiction works as the research object, on the basis of reading the text carefully, analyzes the themes of his travels one by one, and sums up the characteristics of Naipaul's travels, which is supported by the later colonial theory. Through the analysis of Naipaul's "Rootless Man" and "diaspora", it is pointed out that the ultimate purpose of his travel creation is to pursue his own identity. In addition to the introduction and the conclusion, the full text is divided into five parts: the introduction part summarizes the current situation of Naipaul research at home and abroad, and points out that the domestic study on Naipaul's travels literature is not perfect enough. And the meaning of travel literature to Naipaul. The main body is divided into five parts: the first chapter is an overview of the literary characteristics of Naipaul's travels. This paper first compares Naipaul's travel literature with English travel literature in different periods, and points out that Naipaul's travel literature inherits and develops the tradition of English travel literature. Then it is pointed out that the writing of travel literature is the way of his cultural identity. Finally, the characteristics of the hybridity of Naipaul's travels are analyzed. The second, third and fourth chapters analyze the theme of Naipaul's travels and his attitude and comments on the countries he visited. Through text analysis, we can see that Naipaul always has a critical attitude towards these countries and regions from the perspective of Orientalism. The fifth chapter points out that Naipaul's narrative style is changed from subjective narration to the combination of subjective and objective narration by analyzing two recent travels of Naipaul, A glimpse of the South and India: a million Rebellion Today. This shift also means that Naipaul has moved from a purely "oriental" perspective to inclusiveness. The last part is the conclusion, which mainly analyzes Naipaul's attitude towards the three cultural backgrounds from which he comes from. This attitude not only made Naipaul culture "rootless" identity, but also made his travel works show the characteristics of hybridity. This new type of travel style also provides a new reference for other immigrant writers who have experienced similar experiences.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I767.076

【参考文献】