四版本高中历史教科书近代中国对外条约内容研究

发布时间：2018-06-12 17:36

本文选题：课程标准 + 高中历史　；参考：《湖南师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：新课程改革以来,我国高中历史教科书发生了巨大的变化,由原来单一版本的教科书发展为在课程标准指导下的“一纲多本”。不同版本的教科书由于对课程标准的理解和把握不同,教科书内容的选择和编写也存在着差异,而这种差异性为比较研究提供了可能。本文以近代条约内容为研究对象,对人教版、岳麓版、人民版和北师大版的历史必修一政治史做了对比研究。第一部分是通过解读课程标准把握近代中国对外不平等条约的内容设置,了解四版本教科书的编写思想。第二部分是对四版本教科书对外条约设置整体内容的选取与编排的分析,从整体上把握它们之间的共性和差异。第三部分通过对四版本历史教科书具体的条约选择以及相关条约的具体内容、选取的史料做出比较分析,对照其中的异同,有重点的结合现有史学成果分析条约内容。第四部分是针对之前对四版本历史教科书的比较分析,提出现有教科书中近代条约史内容的编写不足,继而提出编写建议和教学建议。
[Abstract]:Since the reform of the new curriculum, great changes have taken place in the history textbooks of senior high school in our country, from the original single version of the textbooks to the "one program and more books" under the guidance of the curriculum standard. Because different versions of textbooks have different understanding and grasp of curriculum standards, there are also differences in the selection and compilation of textbook content, which provides the possibility for comparative research. Taking the contents of modern treaties as the object of study, this paper makes a comparative study of the political history of the people's Education Edition, Yuelu Edition, people's Edition and Beijing normal University Edition. The first part is to grasp the contents of the unequal treaties on foreign affairs in modern China by interpreting the curriculum standards, and to understand the compiling ideas of the four versions of textbooks. The second part is the analysis of the selection and arrangement of the whole contents of the four versions of foreign treaties, and grasp the commonness and difference between them as a whole. The third part makes a comparative analysis of the selected historical materials through the specific treaty selection of the four versions of the history textbook and the specific contents of the relevant treaties, contrasting the similarities and differences among them, focusing on the analysis of the treaty content in combination with the existing historical achievements. In the fourth part, according to the comparative analysis of the four versions of history textbooks before, the author points out that the content of modern treaty history in the existing textbooks is insufficient, and then puts forward some suggestions for compiling and teaching.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.51

【相似文献】