中美高考作文命题对比分析

发布时间：2018-10-30 18:50

【摘要】：随着每年高考落下帷幕,高考作文总是第一时间成为大家关注的焦点,它从另一个方面折射出了中国高考作文命题存在着或多或少的问题。在此笔者从中美两国的作文命题角度分析,探讨我国高考作文与美国作文的差异之处,吸收借鉴其有益之处,同时希望引起教育者的注意,加强对我国高考作文的重视。本研究从中美两国的高考作文命题角度对比入手,全文共分为四章。第一章理清中美两国命题角度差异,首先是界定SAT重要概念,对美国的高考作文有简要的认识,从考试的时间、考试的地点、考试的机构等方面了解其历程发展,从二者的差异表现比较,重点分析中美高考的作文命题在命题形式和选材内容方面的不同之处。第二章系统分析产生差异的原因,从客观因素和主观因素分别比较政治体制、教育体制、作文教学和价值观方面的差异。第三章重点分析两国作文的评价机制,结合两国的教育模式叙述作文的评分标准、评价方式、主体和内容。第四章的主要内容是结合前两章的差异原因分析和评价机制,探讨对我国考试改革、评价标准和作文教学产生的影响和可借鉴之处。
[Abstract]:With the closing of the college entrance examination every year, the composition of the college entrance examination always becomes the focus of attention for the first time. It reflects from another aspect that there are more or less problems in the proposition of the composition of the college entrance examination in China. From the angle of composition proposition between China and the United States, the author probes into the differences between the composition of the college entrance examination in China and the composition of the United States, absorbs and draws lessons from it, and hopes to attract the attention of the educators and strengthen the attention to the composition of the college entrance examination in our country. The thesis is divided into four chapters from the point of view of Chinese and American college entrance examination composition proposition. The first chapter clarifies the differences between Chinese and American propositions. First of all, we define the important concept of SAT, have a brief understanding of the composition of the American college entrance examination, and understand the course of its development from the examination time, the place of the examination, the organization of the examination, and so on. This paper analyzes the differences in the form of proposition and the content of material selection between Chinese and American college entrance examination from the point of view of their differences. The second chapter systematically analyzes the causes of the differences, and compares the differences in political system, education system, composition teaching and values between objective factors and subjective factors. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the evaluation mechanism of the composition of the two countries, combined with the educational model of the two countries to describe the composition of the scoring criteria, evaluation methods, subjects and content. The main content of the fourth chapter is to analyze and evaluate the reasons of the difference between the first two chapters, and discuss the influence and reference to the examination reform, evaluation standard and composition teaching in our country.
【学位授予单位】：淮北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.34

【相似文献】