旅游资源使用价值评估的ZTCM和TCIA方法比较——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例

发布时间：2018-04-08 09:52

  本文选题：游憩价值　切入点：支付意愿　出处：《应用生态学报》2017年08期

【摘要】：分区旅行费用模型(ZTCM)和旅行费用区间模型(TCIA)是两种常用的旅游资源使用价值评估方法,但两种模型因构建的出发点不同而可能导致不同的研究结果.比较两种方法的评估结果对于准确评估旅游资源使用价值具有重要意义.本文采用问卷调查,应用ZTCM和TCIA对北京奥林匹克森林公园的使用价值进行评估.结果表明:基于ZTCM,研究区的景观使用价值为162.36亿元;基于TCIA,景观使用价值为37.32亿元.与ZTCM相比,TCIA对追加费用和旅游人数的拟合度更高.对于同一出发地旅行费用差异较大的样本,TCIA可以有效改进ZTCM假设同一出发地平均消费一致的前提,研究结果更符合实际,更适合准确评估旅游资源的使用价值.
[Abstract]:The zonal travel cost model (ZTCM) and the travel cost interval model (TCIA) are two commonly used methods for evaluating the use value of tourism resources, but the two models may lead to different research results because of their different starting points.It is important to compare the evaluation results of the two methods for the accurate evaluation of the use value of tourism resources.The use value of Beijing Olympic Forest Park is evaluated by ZTCM and TCIA.The results show that the landscape use value of the study area is 16.236 billion yuan based on ZTCM, and the use value of landscape is 3.732 billion yuan based on TCIA.Compared with ZTCM, TCIA has a better fit for additional charges and tourist numbers.For the sample of the same origin where the cost of travel is quite different, the ZTCM can effectively improve the premise that the average consumption of the same origin is consistent. The results of the study are more in line with the reality and are more suitable for the accurate evaluation of the use value of tourism resources.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院生态环境研究中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(71533005)资助~~
【分类号】：F592.7
，

本文编号：1721096