贫困大学生应对方式、心理健康特点及其关系
发布时间：2018-07-14 10:54
【摘要】： 近年来,我国高等教育体制实行逐步改革,高等学校学生的学费逐渐由公费转为自费,使家庭经济困难的大学生面临新的问题,“贫困大学生”在高校中悄然而生。资料显示,高校贫困生占26%左右,贫困生现象及相应的心理健康问题已经日益为社会和高校所关注。研究表明,应对方式的选择与个体的心理健康有着显著的相关。Lazarus早在60年代就有相关的研究,问题取向的应对与心理健康有关(Compas, 1988; Lazarus, Folkman, 1986)。国外早期研究多数以成人或大学生为被试,研究多且涉及面广,关于大学生的应对方式与生理、心理健康的关系也有广泛深入的探讨。国内研究起步较晚,但相关研究也表明应对方式与个体身心健康的关系。姜乾金(1993)等人的研究认为消极应对与心理健康存在相关。刘玉新(2001)研究表明,筹划行动、主动克制等与强迫呈显著负相关,情绪宣泄则与强迫呈显著正相关。 本文试图探讨贫困大学生应对方式、心理健康特点及其关系,为高校贫困大学生心理保健工作提供参考和依据。 根据研究目的我们选取济南大学大一到大四的在校大学生为适合样本,采取随机抽样方法,共抽取4个年级406名大学生,收回有效问卷398份,有效率98%,其中贫困大学生93名,非贫困大学生305名。采用肖计划修订的应对方式问卷(CSS)和精神症状自评量表(SCL-90)以班为单位进行集体施测。运用VFP6.0输入量表数据,之后将其导入spss11.5对数据进行管理和统计分析;主要统计方法:t检验、方差分析以及回归分析。研究结果表明: (1)贫困大学生在应对方式的解决问题因子上得分显著低于非贫困大学生,在自责因子上显著高于非贫困大学生;贫困大学生在SCL-90的躯体化、强迫、人际关系敏感度、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、偏执、精神病性等8个因子上及总分上得分均显著高于非贫困大学,总体上贫困大学生的心理健康水平显著低于非贫困大学生。 (2)贫困大学生中男生得分在应对方式的解决问题因子上显著低于女生;而在SCL-90上的强迫、抑郁、敌对、偏执因子上,男贫困生的得分均显著低于女生。 大一贫困生在应对方式解决问题上得分显著低于大二、大三、大四的贫困生,而在自责因子上显著高于大二、大三、大四贫困生;大四贫困生在SCL-90的人际关系敏感度、焦虑、敌对、偏执、精神病症以及总分上均显著高于大三贫困生,另外在强迫症上大二、大四贫困生均显著高于大一学生,总体上大四贫困生的心理健康水平显著低于其他三个年级的贫困生。 贫困大学生中独生子女在应对方式幻想因子上得分显著高于非独生子女;在SCL-90量表中独生子女的躯体化因子得分显著低于非独生子女。 来自城镇的贫困大学生在SCL-90的躯体化因子上,得分显著高于来自农村的贫困大学生。 (3)应对方式的自责、求助及幻想因子与贫困大学生心理健康总水平相关达到了显著性水平,幻想、求助对心理健康的回归效应显著。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the system of higher education in China has been gradually reformed, and the tuition fees for students in Colleges and universities are gradually transferred from public fee to self fee, which makes college students with economic difficulties facing new problems and the "poor college students" are born quietly in Colleges and universities. The data show that the poor students in Colleges and universities account for 26% left right, the phenomenon of poor students and corresponding psychological health problems have already been found. More and more attention has been paid to society and colleges and universities. The study shows that the choice of coping style has a significant correlation with the mental health of the individual..Lazarus has been studied in 60s, and the response to the problem orientation is related to mental health (Compas, 1988; Lazarus, Folkman, 1986). The relationship between coping style of college students and physiological and mental health is also widely discussed. Domestic research started late, but related research also showed the relationship between coping style and individual physical and mental health. Jiang Qianjin (1993) and others thought that negative should be related to mental health. Liu Yuxin (2001) study It shows that planning action and initiative restraint are negatively correlated with compulsion, while emotional catharsis is positively correlated with compulsion.
This paper attempts to explore the coping style, mental health characteristics and their relationship of poor college students, so as to provide reference and basis for mental health care work of impoverished college students.
According to the purpose of the study, we selected college students from freshmen to senior four of University of Jinan to take random sampling and take a random sampling method. A total of 406 students from 4 grades were collected, 398 valid questionnaires were collected and 98% were effective, including 93 poor college students and 305 non poverty-stricken college students. The revised Coping Style Questionnaire (CSS) and spirit were adopted by the Shaw plan. The symptom checklist (SCL-90) was conducted collectively by the class as a unit. Using the VFP6.0 input data, the data were introduced into SPSS11.5 and the data were managed and analyzed. The main statistical methods: t test, variance analysis and regression analysis. The results showed that:
(1) the scores of poor college students were significantly lower than those of non poor college students on coping styles, and their self remorse factors were significantly higher than those of non poor college students. The scores of 8 factors, such as somatization, compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, prejudice and psychosis in SCL-90, were significantly higher than those in the total score of the poor college students. Generally speaking, the mental health level of impoverished college students is significantly lower than that of non impoverished college students.
(2) the scores of boys in poor college students were significantly lower than those of female students on coping styles, and the scores of male poor students were significantly lower than those of girls on SCL-90, depression, hostility and paranoid factors.
The scores of the poor students in the coping style were significantly lower than that of the sophomores, the third, the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth. The poor students were significantly higher in SCL-90's interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, hostility, paranoia, mental illness and total scores. The mental health level of the poor students is significantly lower than that of the other three grades.
The only child in the poor college students scored significantly higher than non only children on coping style, and the score of the somatization factor of the only child in the SCL-90 scale was significantly lower than that of the non only child.
Poor college students from urban areas scored significantly higher on the somatization factor of SCL-90 than those from poor rural areas.
(3) self reproach of coping style, help seeking and fantasy factors have reached significant level with the general level of mental health of poor college students. Fantasy, the return effect of help to mental health is significant.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：B844.2
本文编号：2121416
[Abstract]:In recent years, the system of higher education in China has been gradually reformed, and the tuition fees for students in Colleges and universities are gradually transferred from public fee to self fee, which makes college students with economic difficulties facing new problems and the "poor college students" are born quietly in Colleges and universities. The data show that the poor students in Colleges and universities account for 26% left right, the phenomenon of poor students and corresponding psychological health problems have already been found. More and more attention has been paid to society and colleges and universities. The study shows that the choice of coping style has a significant correlation with the mental health of the individual..Lazarus has been studied in 60s, and the response to the problem orientation is related to mental health (Compas, 1988; Lazarus, Folkman, 1986). The relationship between coping style of college students and physiological and mental health is also widely discussed. Domestic research started late, but related research also showed the relationship between coping style and individual physical and mental health. Jiang Qianjin (1993) and others thought that negative should be related to mental health. Liu Yuxin (2001) study It shows that planning action and initiative restraint are negatively correlated with compulsion, while emotional catharsis is positively correlated with compulsion.
This paper attempts to explore the coping style, mental health characteristics and their relationship of poor college students, so as to provide reference and basis for mental health care work of impoverished college students.
According to the purpose of the study, we selected college students from freshmen to senior four of University of Jinan to take random sampling and take a random sampling method. A total of 406 students from 4 grades were collected, 398 valid questionnaires were collected and 98% were effective, including 93 poor college students and 305 non poverty-stricken college students. The revised Coping Style Questionnaire (CSS) and spirit were adopted by the Shaw plan. The symptom checklist (SCL-90) was conducted collectively by the class as a unit. Using the VFP6.0 input data, the data were introduced into SPSS11.5 and the data were managed and analyzed. The main statistical methods: t test, variance analysis and regression analysis. The results showed that:
(1) the scores of poor college students were significantly lower than those of non poor college students on coping styles, and their self remorse factors were significantly higher than those of non poor college students. The scores of 8 factors, such as somatization, compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, prejudice and psychosis in SCL-90, were significantly higher than those in the total score of the poor college students. Generally speaking, the mental health level of impoverished college students is significantly lower than that of non impoverished college students.
(2) the scores of boys in poor college students were significantly lower than those of female students on coping styles, and the scores of male poor students were significantly lower than those of girls on SCL-90, depression, hostility and paranoid factors.
The scores of the poor students in the coping style were significantly lower than that of the sophomores, the third, the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth, and the fourth. The poor students were significantly higher in SCL-90's interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, hostility, paranoia, mental illness and total scores. The mental health level of the poor students is significantly lower than that of the other three grades.
The only child in the poor college students scored significantly higher than non only children on coping style, and the score of the somatization factor of the only child in the SCL-90 scale was significantly lower than that of the non only child.
Poor college students from urban areas scored significantly higher on the somatization factor of SCL-90 than those from poor rural areas.
(3) self reproach of coping style, help seeking and fantasy factors have reached significant level with the general level of mental health of poor college students. Fantasy, the return effect of help to mental health is significant.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：B844.2
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 吴磊;;贫困大学生精神贫困问题及其教育对策[J];湖北函授大学学报;2011年03期
2 励业;徐竞;徐刚;;高职贫困生应对方式对主观幸福感的影响研究[J];浙江纺织服装职业技术学院学报;2012年02期
3 曾祥岚;崔淼;;贫困大学生心理状况及其教育对策[J];宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 龚志群;高校贫困生挫折心理与应对方法研究[D];南京林业大学;2011年
2 邓慧娟;大学生心理压力、应付方式及心理健康的关系研究[D];东北师范大学;2010年
3 王丽;高职院校贫困学生挫折教育探析[D];山东师范大学;2010年
，本文编号：2121416
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jgkg/2121416.html
