美国择校政策的政治动力研究
发布时间:2018-05-16 23:30
本文选题:美国 + 择校政策 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2011年博士论文
【摘要】:本文以美国择校政策的政治动力为研究对象,聚焦于回答“谁在推动美国择校政策”这个问题。基于美国特殊的政治制度和政治文化,本文提出理论假设:在美国政治体制中受到宪法保护的,对择校政策具有政治诉求的,在政策过程中代表资源、观念、利益、权力的政策参与者是推动择校政策发展的政治动力。根据研究问题、研究对象和研究假设的特性,作者借鉴保尔·萨巴蒂尔和汉克·简金斯·史密斯的倡议联盟理论,吸收贾内尔·斯考特等人分析择校政策的倡议联盟分析框架,综合其它相关研究成果,提出本文的分析框架。 本文从两个维度和四个方面来分析择校政策的政治动力。第一个是非政府行为的维度。在这个维度中,作者考察资源、观念和利益这三个层面力量的作用,即基金作为一种慈善事业,如何通过资助择校运动推动择校政策,思想库作为一种学术组织,如何通过影响择校观念推动择校政策,倡议组织作为一种利益联盟,如何通过争取择校权力来推动择校政策。第二个是政府行为的维度。在这个维度中,作者考察政治家和政府如何在顺应民意的基础上,利用政治权力和政治资源在政府中推动择校政策。本文认为,代表财富的基金会、代表学术的思想库、代表草根的倡议组织、代表政府的政治家是推动择校从理念变为现实这个历史过程中最重要的四股政治动力。本文共分四章,每一章探讨其中一种政治动力。 本文主要采用定量研究与定性研究相结合的方法。在定量研究方面,本文确定研究问题,提出研究假设,收集数据和信息,分析和解释数据和信息;在定性研究方面,本文主要采用案例研究的方法,选取具有代表性的三个支持择校政策的思想库、三个支持择校的倡议组织、实施择校政策的一个城市和一个州,以及相关政治家作为案例分析的对象。最终,通过分析数据和描述案例,证明支持择校政策的基金会、思想库、倡议组织、政治家确实是推动择校政策发展的重要力量。研究数据和信息主要来源于基金会中心、联邦税务局、联邦统计局、思想库、倡议组织的官方网站,ERIC数据库中的学术论文和研究报告。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the political motivation of American school choice policy and answers the question "who is promoting American school choice policy". Based on the special political system and political culture of the United States, this paper puts forward theoretical assumptions: those protected by the Constitution in the political system of the United States, those who have a political appeal to the school choice policy, represent the resources, ideas, interests in the policy process. The policy participants of power are the political power to promote the development of school choice policy. According to the research questions, the characteristics of the research object and the research hypothesis, the author draws on Paul Sabatil and Hank Jenkins Smith's theory of initiative alliance, and absorbs the framework of the initiative alliance analysis of Janel Scott and others to analyze the school choice policy. Based on other related research results, the analytical framework of this paper is put forward. This paper analyzes the political power of school choice policy from two dimensions and four aspects. The first dimension of non-government behavior. In this dimension, the author examines the role of resources, ideas and interests, that is, how the fund, as a charity, promotes the school choice policy through funding the school selection movement, and the think tank as an academic organization. How to promote the school choice policy through the influence of the school choice concept, the initiative organization as a kind of interest alliance, how to promote the school choice policy by striving for the school choice power. The second is the dimension of government behavior. In this dimension, the author examines how politicians and governments, on the basis of responding to public opinion, use political power and resources to promote school selection policies in the government. This paper holds that the foundation representing wealth, the think-tank of academia, the grassroots advocacy organization, and the politicians representing the government are the four most important political forces in the historical process of promoting the idea of school selection into reality. This article is divided into four chapters, each chapter discusses one of the political dynamics. This paper mainly adopts the method of combining quantitative research with qualitative research. In the aspect of quantitative research, this paper identifies research problems, puts forward research hypotheses, collects data and information, analyzes and interprets data and information. In qualitative research, this paper mainly adopts the method of case study. Three representative think tanks supporting school policy, three advocacy organizations supporting school choice, a city and a state implementing school choice policy, and relevant politicians are selected as the object of case study. Finally, by analyzing the data and describing cases, it is proved that foundations, think tanks, advocacy organizations and politicians that support the school policy are really the important forces to promote the development of the school choice policy. Research data and information are mainly derived from academic papers and research reports in the Foundation Center, the Federal Revenue Office, the Federal Bureau of Statistics, think tanks, and the Initiative's official website, the Eric database.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:G571.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 曾晓东;;美国“择校”中的争论:问题的性质及制度涵义[J];比较教育研究;2008年10期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李海生;教育券政策分析[D];华东师范大学;2007年
2 唐晓娟;美国择校问题研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:1898907
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xueshengguanli/1898907.html