从《俗书刊误》看明代正字法

发布时间：2018-05-11 03:23

本文选题：明代 + 正字法　；参考：《河北师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：《俗书刊误》是一部重要的明代正字法著作。从汉字规范史的角度来看，《俗书刊误》起到了承前启后的作用。它内容丰富、体例完整、正字方法先进、正字观念相对保守。本文以《俗书刊误》为主要研究对象，通过与历代主要正字法著作对比，分别从体例、所收字料、正字方法、正字观念等角度探讨《俗书刊误》的特色、局限，并进一步分析明代正字法的基本概况。论文共有七部分。首先是绪论，概括了迄今为止学术界对《俗书刊误》的研究现状和成果，阐述了本文的研究范围、方法和意义。第一章从历时和共时的角度分别探讨了《俗书刊误》的成书背景。第二章介绍了《俗书刊误》的体例和主要内容。通过对《俗书刊误》各卷的分析，，初步归纳出各卷的体例和所收字料的特点。第三章分析了《俗书刊误》的前四卷注文使用情况，并总结了该书的正字方法。第四章是本文的重要部分。在探讨正、俗字来源的基础上，总结出《俗书刊误》以“六书”为正字标准，基本不考虑文字使用情况的正字观念。第五章从文字学史的角度，主要通过与《说文解字》、《干禄字书》、《五经文字》、《新加九经字样》、《玉篇》、《类篇》、《字汇》、《正字通》等历代汉字规范著作对比，评价了《俗书刊误》在所收字料、正字方法、正字观等方面的贡献与局限。最后是结语，对本文的研究内容和研究成果进行了全面总结。
[Abstract]:Mistake of Common Books and periodicals is an important orthographic work in Ming Dynasty. From the point of view of the Chinese character normative history, Common Books and periodicals errors play a role of connecting the past and the future. It is rich in content, complete style, the method of correct character is advanced, the concept of correct character is relatively conservative. This article takes Common Books and periodicals error as the main research object, by comparing with the main orthographic works of the past dynasties, discusses the characteristics and limitations of the Common Books and periodicals error from the aspects of style, the materials received, the method of correcting characters, the concept of correct characters, etc. And further analysis of the basic situation of orthography in Ming Dynasty. There are seven parts in this paper. The first part is introduction, which summarizes the current situation and achievements of academic research on "Common Books and periodicals", and expounds the research scope, methods and significance of this paper. The first chapter discusses the background of the book from diachronic and synchronic angles. The second chapter introduces the style and main contents of Common Books and periodicals errors. Based on the analysis of various volumes of Common Books and periodicals, the style of each volume and the characters of the collected materials are preliminarily summed up. The third chapter analyzes the usage of the first four volumes of the book, and summarizes the correct method of the book. The fourth chapter is an important part of this paper. On the basis of discussing the source of correct and common characters, this paper sums up the idea that "six Books" is the standard of "six Books", and the usage of characters is not considered. The fifth chapter, from the angle of the history of philology, mainly compares with the normative works of Chinese characters in the past dynasties, such as Shuowenjiezi >, Gan-Lu Zi Shu, Wujing characters >, New addition of Nine Classical characters >, < jade articles >, < Classical articles >, < Vocabulary >, "Orthography", and so on. This paper evaluates the contribution and limitation of Common Books and periodicals in the aspects of the materials received, the method of correct characters, the view of correct characters, and so on. Finally, the conclusion summarizes the research content and research results.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H124.1

【共引文献】