表非疑问的疑问代词“哪”和“（？）”的对比

发布时间：2018-06-29 19:03

本文选题：汉语 + 韩国语　；参考：《延边大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在人类的语言活动中,“疑问”和“非疑问”是一种并行的多层面的复杂现象。随着语言的不断发展,语言的表达方式也不断丰富,疑问代词的非疑问用法就是其中的一个重要代表。本文以三维语法为指导思想,运用对比语言学理论探讨疑问代词“哪”和“(?)”在语义、句法、语用方面的共性和个性。全文由5个部分构成。第一章是绪论部分。首先概括地提出研究目的和意义,综述汉语“哪”和韩国语“(?)”的相关研究概况,交代研究内容、方法以及语料来源。第二章对汉语“哪”和韩国语“(?)”的语义进行对比。主要根据辞书中的释义和语料分析,从虚指、任指、否定三个方面对疑问代词“哪”和“(?)”进行对比,进而找出异同点。第三章对汉语“哪”和韩国语“(?)”的句法进行对比。从句法功能角度考察“哪”和“(?)”所充当的句法成分、从句中分布角度考察“哪”和“(?)”的句中位置,进而找出两者的异同点。第四章对汉语“哪”和韩国语“(?)”的语用功能进行对比。对汉语“哪”和韩国语“(?)”的使用频率、句类分布上的一些特点、轻重音进行对比,进而找出两者的异同点。最后是结语,对本文的内容进行概括和总结,指出本文的不足之处。
[Abstract]:In human language activities, "doubt" and "non-doubt" are parallel and multidimensional complex phenomena. With the continuous development of language, the expression of language is becoming more and more abundant, and the non-interrogative usage of interrogative pronouns is one of the important representatives. This paper, guided by three-dimensional grammar, uses the theory of contrastive linguistics to explore the interrogative pronouns "which" and "(?)" Generality and individuality in semantic, syntactic and pragmatic aspects. The full text consists of five parts. The first chapter is the introduction. First of all, the purpose and significance of the research are summarized, and the Chinese "which" and the Korean "(?)" are summarized. A survey of relevant research, description of the research content, methods and sources of the corpus. The second chapter is about Chinese "which" and Korean "(?)" To compare the semantics of. According to the interpretation and corpus analysis in dictionaries, this paper analyzes the interrogative pronouns "which" and "(?)" from the three aspects of fictitious reference, random reference and negation. Compare and find out the similarities and differences. Chapter three deals with "which" and "Korean" in Chinese? The syntax of this article is contrasted. A study of "which" and "(?)" from the Perspective of syntactic function As a syntactic component, the article examines "which" and "(?)" from the perspective of distribution in clauses In order to find out the similarities and differences between the two. The fourth chapter is about "which" in Chinese and "Korean" (?) The pragmatic functions of the paper are compared. For Chinese "which" and Korean "(?)" The frequency of use, some characteristics of sentence distribution, the comparison of light and heavy sounds, and then find out the similarities and differences between the two. Finally, the conclusion, the content of this paper summarized and summarized, pointing out the shortcomings of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H136;H55

【相似文献】